6 research outputs found

    Ultrasonographic features of peritoneal cestodiasis caused by Mesocestoides sp. in a dog and in a cat

    No full text
    Peritoneal infections caused by Mesocestoides spp. are rare in dogs and cats. Little data exist on the role of abdominal ultrasonography for diagnosis and therapy management of the disease. We describe the ultrasonographic features of peritoneal cestodiasis in a dog and in a cat. In the dog, abdominal ultrasound allowed both a presumptive diagnosis and the collection of tissue samples to confirm peritoneal larval infection. Utrasound was also very useful for therapy management. In the second patient the ultrasonographic features of tetrathyridial infection in a cat in which the parasite was observed as an incidental finding during ovariohysterectomy are described

    Cross-reactions of sera from dogs infected with <it>Angiostrongylus vasorum</it> in commercially available <it>Dirofilaria immitis</it> test kits

    Get PDF
    <p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p><it>Dirofilaria immitis</it> and <it>Angiostrongylus vasorum</it> are both important potentially fatal canine nematodes with overlapping endemic areas, especially in Europe. The preadult and adult stages of both species are living in the Arteria pulmonalis and the right heart, and diagnostically detectable circulating parasite antigens have been demonstrated for both species. For the detection of <it>D. immitis</it> infections, a variety of commercial tests have been developed, however, they have not been evaluated for cross-reactions against circulating antigens of <it>A. vasorum.</it></p> <p>Methods</p> <p>In this study, potential cross-reactions of sera from 16 dogs, which were experimentally infected with <it>A. vasorum</it> and which had circulating antigens as confirmed by a species-specific ELISA, were evaluated for the detection of <it>A. vasorum</it> antigen in six commercially available <it>D. immitis</it> test kits.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>In three fast tests (Witness® Dirofilaria, SensPERT® Canine Heartworm, SNAP® 4Dx® Plus), all sera were negative. One fast membrane ELISA (SNAP® HTWM RT Test) was positive with four sera (25%), and one serum delivered a non-valid result twice. In the PetChek® HTWM PF Test, depending on the interpretation protocol, 5 or 8 dogs (31.2 – 50%) were positive. With the DiroCHEK®-ELISA, a single <it>A. vasorum</it>-infected dog (6.2%) tested positive.</p> <p>Conclusions</p> <p>Due to potential cross-reactions with <it>A. vasorum</it> in commercially available test kits for the detection of <it>D. immitis</it> antigen, the simultaneous use of highly specific diagnostic methods for the differentiation of these two canine heart worms is recommended.</p

    Human and Animal Dirofilariasis: the Emergence of a Zoonotic Mosaic

    No full text
    corecore