22 research outputs found

    Spectral Asymmetry and Higuchi’s Fractal Dimension Measures of Depression Electroencephalogram

    Get PDF
    This study was aimed to compare two electroencephalogram (EEG) analysis methods, spectral asymmetry index (SASI) and Higuchi’s fractal dimension (HFD), for detection of depression. Linear SASI method is based on evaluation of the balance of powers in two EEG frequency bands in one channel selected higher and lower than the alpha band spectrum maximum. Nonlinear HFD method calculates fractal dimension directly in the time domain. The resting EEG signals of 17 depressive patients and 17 control subjects were used as a database for calculations. SASI values were positive for depressive and negative for control group (P0.05). The results indicated that the linear EEG analysis method SASI and the nonlinear HFD method both demonstrated a good sensitivity for detection of characteristic features of depression in a single-channel EEG

    Ensemble approach for detection of depression using EEG features

    Get PDF
    Depression is a public health issue which severely affects one's well being and cause negative social and economic effect for society. To rise awareness of these problems, this publication aims to determine if long lasting effects of depression can be determined from electoencephalographic (EEG) signals. The article contains accuracy comparison for SVM, LDA, NB, kNN and D3 binary classifiers which were trained using linear (relative band powers, APV, SASI) and non-linear (HFD, LZC, DFA) EEG features. The age and gender matched dataset consisted of 10 healthy subjects and 10 subjects with depression diagnosis at some point in their lifetime. Several of the proposed feature selection and classifier combinations reached accuracy of 90% where all models where evaluated using 10-fold cross validation and averaged over 100 repetitions with random sample permutations.Comment: 8 pages, 2 figure

    Drugs with a negative impact on cognitive function (Part 1): chronic kidney disease as a risk factor

    Get PDF
    People living with chronic kidney disease (CKD) frequently suffer from mild cognitive impairment and/or other neurocognitive disorders. This review in two parts will focus on adverse drug reactions resulting in cognitive impairment as a potentially modifiable risk factor in CKD patients. Many patients with CKD have a substantial burden of comorbidities leading to polypharmacy. A recent study found that patients seen by nephrologists were the most complex to treat because of their high number of comorbidities and medications. Due to polypharmacy, these patients may experience a wide range of adverse drug reactions. Along with CKD progression, the accumulation of uremic toxins may lead to blood–brain barrier (BBB) disruption and pharmacokinetic alterations, increasing the risk of adverse reactions affecting the central nervous system (CNS). In patients on dialysis, the excretion of drugs that depend on kidney function is severely reduced such that adverse and toxic levels of a drug or its metabolites may be reached at relatively low doses, unless dosing is adjusted. This first review will discuss how CKD represents a risk factor for adverse drug reactions affecting the CNS via (i) BBB disruption associated with CKD and (ii) the impact of reduced kidney function and dialysis itself on drug pharmacokinetics

    Surrogate Data Method Requires End-Matched Segmentation of Electroencephalographic Signals to Estimate Non-linearity

    No full text
    The aim of the study is to clarify the impact of the strong cyclic signal component on the results of surrogate data method in the case of resting electroencephalographic (EEG) signals. In addition, the impact of segment length is analyzed. Different non-linear measures (fractality, complexity, etc.) of neural signals have been demonstrated to be useful to infer the non-linearity of brain functioning from EEG. The surrogate data method is often applied to test whether or not the non-linear structure can be captured from the data. In addition, a growing number of studies are using surrogate data method to determine the statistical threshold of connectivity values in network analysis. Current study focuses on the conventional segmentation of EEG signals, which could lead to false results of surrogate data method. More specifically, the necessity to use end-matched segments that contain an integer number of dominant frequency periods is studied. EEG recordings from 80 healthy volunteers during eyes-closed resting state were analyzed using multivariate surrogate data method. The artificial surrogate data were generated by shuffling the phase spectra of original signals. The null hypothesis that time series were generated by a linear process was rejected by statistically comparing the non-linear statistics calculated for original and surrogate data sets. Five discriminating statistics were used as non-linear estimators: Higuchi fractal dimension (HFD), Katz fractal dimension (KFD), Lempel-Ziv complexity (LZC), sample entropy (SampEn) and synchronization likelihood (SL). The results indicate that the number of segments evaluated as non-linear differs in the case of various non-linear measures and changes with the segment length. The main conclusion is that the dependence on the deviation of the segment length from full periods of dominant EEG frequency has non-monotonic character and causes misleading results in the evaluation of non-linearity. Therefore, in the case of the signals with non-monotonic spectrum and strong dominant frequency, the correct use of surrogate data method requires the signal length comprising of full periods of the spectrum dominant frequency. The study is important to understand the influence of incorrect selection of EEG signal segment length for surrogate data method to estimate non-linearity
    corecore