42 research outputs found
Perceptions, preferences and barriers: A qualitative study of greenspace and under-representation in Leeds, UK
1. Greenspaces facilitate well-being benefits for humans in several ways including through cognitive restoration, physical exercise and social interaction. However, some groups are under-represented in greenspaces, including women, older people, those with health conditions, people with lower socioeconomic status and people from ethnic minority backgrounds, and so are less likely to accrue these benefits. /
2. Using thematic analysis and semi-structured interviews with 40 individuals from under-represented groups in Leeds, UK, we explore (1) a range of perceived barriers to greenspace access, (2) how spending time in greenspace contributes to well-being for these groups, (3) the perceived positive and negative aspects of greenspace, (4) what impact COVID-19 had on access to greenspace and (5) how greenspaces could be improved. /
3. We also highlight inter-group differences and how some barriers disproportionately affect some of the groups in this study. Safety concerns were particularly important for women and people with low incomes, which included problems with anti-social behaviour (e.g. incivilities and disorder). Cultural barriers were also evident with ethnic minority participants often citing concerns about dogs and issues with visibility and prejudice. Participants desired physical improvements to the quality of greenspaces, along with easier access and transport options, changes in policy regarding dogs and increased security and park wardens to limit anti-social behaviour. /
4. We argue that to increase visitation for under-represented groups, upgrades in the physical environment must be coupled with harnessing community involvement and co-design. Some group differences and tensions in greenspaces, and problems with anti-social behaviours and safety concerns might be limited by more considerate planning and incorporating research findings that address these tensions through intergroup contact
Perceptions, preferences and barriers: A qualitative study of greenspace and under-representation in Leeds, UK
AbstractGreenspaces facilitate wellâbeing benefits for humans in several ways including through cognitive restoration, physical exercise and social interaction. However, some groups are underârepresented in greenspaces, including women, older people, those with health conditions, people with lower socioeconomic status and people from ethnic minority backgrounds, and so are less likely to accrue these benefits.Using thematic analysis and semiâstructured interviews with 40 individuals from underârepresented groups in Leeds, UK, we explore (1) a range of perceived barriers to greenspace access, (2) how spending time in greenspace contributes to wellâbeing for these groups, (3) the perceived positive and negative aspects of greenspace, (4) what impact COVIDâ19 had on access to greenspace and (5) how greenspaces could be improved.We also highlight interâgroup differences and how some barriers disproportionately affect some of the groups in this study. Safety concerns were particularly important for women and people with low incomes, which included problems with antiâsocial behaviour (e.g. incivilities and disorder). Cultural barriers were also evident with ethnic minority participants often citing concerns about dogs and issues with visibility and prejudice. Participants desired physical improvements to the quality of greenspaces, along with easier access and transport options, changes in policy regarding dogs and increased security and park wardens to limit antiâsocial behaviour.We argue that to increase visitation for underârepresented groups, upgrades in the physical environment must be coupled with harnessing community involvement and coâdesign. Some group differences and tensions in greenspaces, and problems with antiâsocial behaviours and safety concerns might be limited by more considerate planning and incorporating research findings that address these tensions through intergroup contact.Read the freePlain Language Summaryfor this article on the Journal blog.</jats:p