Front Pharmacol

The COVID-19 epidemic has disrupted care and access to care in many ways. It was accompanied by an excess of cardiovascular drug treatment discontinuations. We sought to investigate a deeper potential impact of the COVID-19 epidemic on antihypertensive drug treatment disruptions by assessing whether the epidemic induced some changes in the characteristics of disruptions in terms of duration, treatment outcome, and patient characteristics. From March 2018 to February 2021, a repeated cohort analysis was performed using French national health insurance databases. The impact of the epidemic on treatment discontinuations and resumption of antihypertensive medications was assessed using preformed interrupted time series analyses either on a quarterly basis. Among all adult patients on antihypertensive medication, we identified 2,318,844 (18.7%) who discontinued their antihypertensive treatment during the first blocking period in France. No differences were observed between periods in the characteristics of patients who interrupted their treatment or in the duration of treatment disruptions. The COVID-19 epidemic was not accompanied by a change in the proportion of patients who fully resumed treatment after a disruption, neither in level nor in trend/slope [change in level: 2.66 (-0.11; 5.42); change in slope: -0.67 (-1.54; 0.20)]. Results were similar for the proportion of patients who permanently discontinued treatment within 1 year of disruption [level change: -0.21 (-2.08; 1.65); slope change: 0.24 (-0.40; 0.87)]. This study showed that, although it led to an increase in cardiovascular drug disruptions, the COVID-19 epidemic did not change the characteristics of these. First, disruptions were not prolonged, and post-disruption treatment outcomes remained unchanged. Second, patients who experienced antihypertensive drug disruptions during the COVID-19 outbreak were essentially similar to those who experienced disruptions before it

Risk of Drug-Drug Interactions in Out-Hospital Drug Dispensings in France: Results From the DRUG-Drug Interaction Prevalence Study

Introduction: Drug interactions could account for 1% of hospitalizations in the general population and 2-5% of hospital admissions in the elderly. However, few data are available on the drugs concerned and the potential severity of the interactions encountered. We thus first aimed to estimate the prevalence of dispensings including drugs Contraindicated or Discommended because of Interactions (CDI codispensings) and to identify the most frequently involved drug pairs. Second, we aimed to investigate whether the frequency of CDI codispensings appeared higher or lower than the expected for the drugs involved. Methods: We carried out a study using a random sample of all drugs dispensings registered in a database of the French Health Insurance System between 2010 and 2015. The distribution of the drugs involved was described considering active principles, detailing the 20 most frequent ones for both contraindicated or discommended codispensings (DCs). To investigate whether the frequency of CDI codispensings appeared higher or lower than the expected for the drugs involved, we developed a specific indicator, the Drug-drug interaction prevalence study-score (DIPS-score), that compares for each drug pair the observed frequency of codispensing to its expected probability. The latter is determined considering the frequencies of dispensings of the individual drugs constituting a pair of interest. Results: We analyzed 6,908,910 dispensings: 13,196 (0.2%) involved contraindicated codispensings (CCs), and 95,410 (1.4%) DCs. For CCS, the most frequently involved drug pair was "bisoprolol+flecainide" = 5,036); four out of five of the most represented pairs involved cardiovascular drugs. For DCS, the most frequently involved drug pair was "ramipril+spironolactone" = 4,741); all of the five most represented pairs involved cardiovascular drugs. The drug pair involved in the CC with the highest score value was "citalopram+hydroxyzine" (DIPS-score: 3.7; 2.9-4.6); that with the lowest score was "clarithromycin+simvastatin" (DIPS-score: 0.2; 0.2-0.3). DIPS-score median value was 0.4 for CCs and 0.6 for DCs. Conclusion: This high prevalence of CDI codispensings enforces the need for further risk-prevention actions regarding drug-drug interactions (DDIs), especially for arrhythmogenic or anti-arrhythmic drugs. In this perspective, the DIPS-score we develop could ease identifying the interactions that are poorly considered by clinicians/pharmacists and targeting interventions

Risk of first ischaemic stroke and use of antidopaminergic antiemetics: nationwide case-time-control study

OBJECTIVE: To estimate the risk of ischaemic stroke associated with antidopaminergic antiemetic (ADA) use. DESIGN: Case-time-control study. SETTING: Data from the nationwide French reimbursement healthcare system database Système National des Données de Santé (SNDS). PARTICIPANTS: Eligible participants were ≥18 years with a first ischaemic stroke between 2012 and 2016 and at least one reimbursement for any ADA in the 70 days before stroke. Frequencies of ADA reimbursements were compared for a risk period (days -14 to -1 before stroke) and three matched reference periods (days -70 to -57, -56 to -43, and -42 to -29) for each patient. Time trend of ADA use was controlled by using a control group of 21 859 randomly selected people free of the event who were individually matched to patients with stroke according to age, sex, and risk factors of ischaemic stroke. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Association between ADA use and risk of ischaemic stroke was assessed by estimating the ratio of the odds ratios of exposure evaluated in patients with stroke and in controls. Analyses were adjusted for time varying confounders (anticoagulants, antiplatelets, and prothrombotic or vasoconstrictive drugs). RESULTS: Among the 2612 patients identified with incident stroke, 1250 received an ADA in the risk period and 1060 in the reference periods. The comparison with the 5128 and 13 165 controls who received an ADA in the same periods yielded a ratio of adjusted odds ratios of 3.12 (95% confidence interval 2.85 to 3.42). Analyses stratified by age, sex, and history of dementia showed similar results. Ratio of adjusted odds ratios for analyses stratified by ADA was 2.51 (2.18 to 2.88) for domperidone, 3.62 (3.11 to 4.23) for metopimazine, and 3.53 (2.62 to 4.76) for metoclopramide. Sensitivity analyses suggested the risk would be higher in the first days of use. CONCLUSIONS: Using French nationwide exhaustive reimbursement data, this self-controlled study reported an increased risk of ischaemic stroke with recent ADA use. The highest increase was found for metopimazine and metoclopramide

J Clin Med

We aimed to describe the burden represented by potentially inappropriate medications (PIMs) in chronic polypharmacy in France. We conducted a nationwide cross-sectional study using data from the French National Insurance databases. The study period was from 1 January 2016 to 31 December 2016. Chronic drug use was defined as uninterrupted daily use lasting ?6 months. Chronic polypharmacy was defined as the chronic use of ?5 medications, and chronic hyperpolypharmacy as the chronic use of ?10 medications. For individuals aged ?65 (older adults), PIMs were defined according to the Beers and Laroche lists, and for individuals aged 45-64 years (middle-aged) PIMs were defined according to the PROMPT (Prescribing Optimally in Middle-aged People's Treatments) list. Among individuals with chronic polypharmacy, 4009 (46.2%) middle-aged and 18,036 (64.8%) older adults had at least one chronic PIM. Among individuals with chronic hyperpolypharmacy, these figures were, respectively, 570 (75.0%) and 2544 (88.7%). The most frequent chronic PIM were proton pump inhibitors (43.4% of older adults with chronic polypharmacy), short-acting benzodiazepines (older adults: 13.7%; middle-aged: 16.1%), hypnotics (6.1%; 7.4%), and long-acting sulfonylureas (3.9%; 12.3%). The burden of chronic PIM appeared to be very high in our study, concerning almost half of middle-aged adults and two-thirds of older adults with chronic polypharmacy. Deprescribing interventions in polypharmacy should primarily target proton pump inhibitors and hypnotics

Diabetes Obes Metab

AIM: Sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT-2i) have been commercialized in France for type 2 diabetes since April 2020 and later for heart and renal diseases. Given the recent developments in treating diabetes and the widening of SGLT-2i indications, we aimed to study changes in the use of glucose-lowering drugs in France and to characterize SGLT-2i new users. METHODS: We performed a nationwide utilization study using the French health insurance database. Trends in incidence and prevalence of glucose-lowering drug use were assessed by a repeated cross-sectional study in 2019 and 2021. A cohort study of incident SGLT-2i users was then conducted to describe patient characteristics and the strategy for treating diabetes. RESULTS: The prevalence of SGLT-2i use gradually reached 0.1% in the third quarter of 2021 and increased more significantly to 0.2% thereafter. SGLT-2i became the second most prescribed glucose-lowering drug class after metformin at the end of 2021 (0.1%). Among the cohort of 125 387 SGLT-2i new users (mean age 65.0 years; 60.1% of men), 87.6% presented a diabetic comorbidity. The patient profile changed over the study period with an increasing proportion of patients with cardiovascular (28.7% in 2020 vs. 40.2% in 2021) or renal (7.7% in 2020 vs. 11.8% in 2021) comorbidities at initiation. The main combinations used at SGLT-2i initiation were metformin (12.5%) and metformin plus dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors (8.1%). One-year probability of SGLT-2i persistence was estimated to be 55%. CONCLUSION: The expansion of indications for SGLT-2i and the broadening of the target population make it essential to assess the reasons for discontinuation and review their safety profile

Antiherpetic drugs: a potential way to prevent Alzheimer's disease?

BACKGROUND: Considering the growing body of evidence suggesting a potential implication of herpesviruses in the development of dementia, several authors have questioned a protective effect of antiherpetic drugs (AHDs) which may represent a new means of prevention, well tolerated and easily accessible. Subsequently, several epidemiological studies have shown a reduction in the risk of dementia in subjects treated with AHDs, but the biological plausibility of this association and the impact of potential methodological biases need to be discussed in more depth. METHODS: Using a French medico-administrative database, we assessed the association between the intake of systemic AHDs and the incidence of (i) dementia, (ii) Alzheimer's disease (AD), and (iii) vascular dementia in 68,291 subjects over 65 who were followed between 2009 and 2017. Regarding potential methodological biases, Cox models were adjusted for numerous potential confounding factors (including proxies of sociodemographic status, comorbidities, and use of healthcare) and sensitivity analyses were performed in an attempt to limit the risk of indication and reverse causality biases. RESULTS: 9.7% of subjects (n=6642) had at least one intake of systemic AHD, and 8883 incident cases of dementia were identified. Intake of at least one systemic AHD during follow-up was significantly associated with a decreased risk of AD (aHR 0.85 95% confidence interval [0.75-0.96], p=0.009) and, to a lesser extent with respect to p values, to both dementia from any cause and vascular dementia. The association with AD remained significant in sensitivity analyses. The number of subjects with a regular intake was low and prevented us from studying its association with dementia. CONCLUSIONS: Taking at least one systemic AHD during follow-up was significantly associated with a 15% reduced risk of developing AD, even after taking into account several potential methodological biases. Nevertheless, the low frequency of subjects with a regular intake questions the biological plausibility of this association and highlights the limits of epidemiological data to evaluate a potential protective effect of a regular treatment by systemic AHDs on the incidence of dementia

Cost-effectiveness of screening of coronary artery disease in patients with type 2 DIABetes at a very high cardiovascular risk (SCADIAB study) rational and design

Background: Screening for coronary artery disease (CAD) remains broadly performed in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2DM), although the lack of evidence. We conduct a real-world evidence (RWE) study to assess the risk of major clinical outcomes and economic impact of routine CAD screening in T2DM individuals at a very high cardiovascular risk. Methods: SCADIAB is a comparative nationwide cohort study using data from the French National Health Data System. The main inclusion criteria are: age ≥ 40 years, DT2 diagnosed for ≥ 7 years, with ≥ 2 additional cardiovascular risk factors plus a history of microvascular or macrovascular disease, except CAD. We estimated ≥ 90,000 eligible participants for our study. Data will be extracted from 01/01/2008 to 31/12/2019. Eligible participants will be identified during a first 7-year selection period (2008–2015). Each participant will be assigned either in experimental (CAD screening procedure during the selection period) or control group (no CAD screening) on 01/01/2015, and followed for 5 years. The primary endpoint is the incremental cost per life year saved over 5 years in CAD screening group versus no CAD screening. The main secondary endpoints are: total 5-year direct costs of each strategy; incidence of major cardiovascular (acute coronary syndrome, hospitalization for heart failure, coronary revascularization or all-cause death), cerebrovascular (hospitalization for transient ischemic attack, stroke, or carotid revascularization) and lower-limb events (peripheral artery disease, ischemic diabetic foot, lower-limb revascularization or amputation); and the budget impact for the French Insurance system to promote the cost-effective strategy. Analyses will be adjusted for a high-dimension propensity score taking into account known and unknown confounders. SCADIAB has been funded by the French Ministry of Health and the protocol has been approved by the French ethic authorities. Data management and analyses will start in the second half of 2021. Discussion: SCADIAB is a large and contemporary RWE study that will assess the economic and clinical impacts of routine CAD screening in T2DM people at a very high cardiovascular risk. It will also evaluate the clinical practice regarding CAD screening and help to make future recommendations and optimize the use of health care resources

Risk of Drug-Drug Interactions in Out-Hospital Drug Dispensings in France: Results From the DRUG-Drug Interaction Prevalence Study

Introduction: Drug interactions could account for 1% of hospitalizations in the general population and 2–5% of hospital admissions in the elderly. However, few data are available on the drugs concerned and the potential severity of the interactions encountered. We thus first aimed to estimate the prevalence of dispensings including drugs Contraindicated or Discommended because of Interactions (CDI codispensings) and to identify the most frequently involved drug pairs. Second, we aimed to investigate whether the frequency of CDI codispensings appeared higher or lower than the expected for the drugs involved.Methods: We carried out a study using a random sample of all drugs dispensings registered in a database of the French Health Insurance System between 2010 and 2015. The distribution of the drugs involved was described considering active principles, detailing the 20 most frequent ones for both contraindicated or discommended codispensings (DCs). To investigate whether the frequency of CDI codispensings appeared higher or lower than the expected for the drugs involved, we developed a specific indicator, the Drug-drug interaction prevalence study-score (DIPS-score), that compares for each drug pair the observed frequency of codispensing to its expected probability. The latter is determined considering the frequencies of dispensings of the individual drugs constituting a pair of interest.Results: We analyzed 6,908,910 dispensings: 13,196 (0.2%) involved contraindicated codispensings (CCs), and 95,410 (1.4%) DCs. For CCS, the most frequently involved drug pair was “bisoprolol+flecainide” (n = 5,036); four out of five of the most represented pairs involved cardiovascular drugs. For DCS, the most frequently involved drug pair was “ramipril+spironolactone” (n = 4,741); all of the five most represented pairs involved cardiovascular drugs. The drug pair involved in the CC with the highest score value was “citalopram+hydroxyzine” (DIPS-score: 3.7; 2.9–4.6); that with the lowest score was “clarithromycin+simvastatin” (DIPS-score: 0.2; 0.2–0.3). DIPS-score median value was 0.4 for CCs and 0.6 for DCs.Conclusion: This high prevalence of CDI codispensings enforces the need for further risk-prevention actions regarding drug-drug interactions (DDIs), especially for arrhythmogenic or anti-arrhythmic drugs. In this perspective, the DIPS-score we develop could ease identifying the interactions that are poorly considered by clinicians/pharmacists and targeting interventions

Dysregulation of Ribosome Biogenesis and Translational Capacity Is Associated with Tumor Progression of Human Breast Cancer Cells

Protein synthesis is a fundamental cell process and ribosomes - particularly through the ribosomal RNA that display ribozyme activity - are the main effectors of this process. Ribosome biogenesis is a very complex process involving transcriptional a

Pharmacoepidemiological evaluation of the recommended drug combination in cardiovascular secondary prevention

En France, le syndrome coronaire aigu (SCA) représente environ 100 000 hospitalisations par an. Il est recommandé, en prévention secondaire du SCA, un traitement combinant quatre classes médicamenteuses : bêtabloquants, antiagrégants plaquettaires, statines, et inhibiteurs de l’enzyme de conversion ou antagonistes des récepteurs à l’angiotensine II(combinaison BASI). L’objectif de ce travail était l’étude, en situation réelle de soin et en population générale, de l’utilisation et de l’effectivité de la combinaison thérapeutique recommandée en prévention secondaire du SCA. Nous avons d’abord exploré le potentiel représenté par les bases de données médicoadministratives françaises pour cette évaluation. Nous avons ensuite étudié l’utilisation de la combinaison BASI : 42 % des patients étaient traités par la combinaison BASI en post-SCA et 57 % d’entre eux étaient encore traités à deux ans ; la persistance au traitement était plus faible chez les patients âgés, chez ceux ayant d’autres co-morbidités et chez ceux ayant eu un SCA de nature autre qu’un infarctus du myocarde.Nous avons enfin étudié l’effectivité de la combinaison BASI : la combinaison BASI était la combinaison thérapeutique la plus effective à long terme après un SCA chez les patients avec antécédent d’insuffisance cardiaque ; chez les patients sans antécédent de ce type la combinaison sans bêtabloquants n’était pas associée à une augmentation du risque.Ces résultats permettent de reconsidérer l’intérêt à long terme de l’ensemble de la combinaison BASI en post-SCA chez tous les patients et mettent en avant la nécessité de renforcer les stratégies d’éducation thérapeutique.Acute coronary syndrome (ACS) causes approximately 100,000 hospitalisations per year in France. In secondary prevention of ACS, guidelines advocate pharmacological treatment combining four drug classes: beta-blockers, antiplatelet agents, statins and angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors or angiotensin receptor blockers (recommended combination).The aim of this work was to study, in real life and among the general population, the use and the effectiveness of the recommended combination for secondary prevention of ACS.Firstly, we explored the potential represented by the French claims databases in this context. Secondly, we studied the use of the recommended combination: 42% of patients were treated with the recommended combination in post-ACS and 57% of them were still treated two years after; persistence to combination was lower in older patients, in those with other comorbidities and those who had an ACS different of myocardial infarction. Thirdly, we studied the effectiveness of the recommended combination: the recommended combination was the most effective combination therapy at long-term in post-ACS patients with history of heart failure; in patients without such history the combination without betablockers was not associated with an increased risk. These results could help reconsidering the long-term interest of the full recommended combination in all ACS patients and highlight the need to strengthen patient education strategies