Age and Developmental History of Iowa Fens

Iowa fens are small, mineorotrophic peatlands maintained by shallow groundwater. Eighteen fen sites located across northern Iowa were mapped and radiocarbon dated to assess the timing of initial peat accumulation. The radiocarbon ages span the Holocene, ranging from 1,240 to 10,900 B.P.; however most fens postdate 5,000 yr B.P. The dominance of late-Holocene ages suggests that Holocene climatic change may have strongly influenced the record of peat accumulation. During the mid-Holocene Iowa was warmer and drier than at present, and peat was degraded or accumulated slowly in fens. The range of ages also implies that the commencement and subsequent rate of peat accumulation depends on local variations in landscape development and resultant hydrology

Surficial geologic map of the Des Moines Lobe of Iowa, Phase 5: Polk County

https://ir.uiowa.edu/igs_ofm/1030/thumbnail.jp

Surficial Geologic Map of the Des Moines Lobe of Iowa, Huxley and Slater 7.5\u27 quadrangles

https://ir.uiowa.edu/igs_ofm/1022/thumbnail.jp

Surficial geologic materials of Linn County, Iowa

https://ir.uiowa.edu/igs_ofm/1009/thumbnail.jp

Surficial geologic materials of the Marion Quadrangle, Iowa

https://ir.uiowa.edu/igs_ofm/1002/thumbnail.jp

Geology of Iowa Fens

Fens are peatlands which are dependent on groundwater discharge to provide nutrient enrichment. Fens are found in a variety of landscape positions and in most Iowa landform regions. This paper presents a classification system for Iowa fens based on landscape position, stratigraphy, and hydrologic factors. Iowa fens can be separated into six categories: 1) fens along valley wall slopes; the groundwater source for these fens is sand and gravel buried between glacial tills (inter-till); 2) fens in hummocky topography on the northwestern margin of the Des Moines Lobe landform region; the water source is sand and gravel buried within glacial till (intra-till) which exhibits artesian flow; 3) fens on edges of exhumed sand and gravel on the Iowan Surface; the water source is the exposed sand and gravel; 4) fens on benched alluvial terraces or glacial outwash settings; the water source is sand and gravel exposed at the surface; 5) fens recharged by bedrock aquifers; and 6) fens in abandoned channel areas whose water source is either sand and gravel exposed at the surface or bedrock aquifers. The lithology, weathering characteristics and thickness of the deposits in the fens groundwater basin influence infiltration rate, and thus recharge to the fens. The constancy of the water source and the rate of flow to the fen are important both in the long-term maintenance of the fens and in controlling their vulnerability to hydrologic and chemical disturbance

Surficial geologic materials of the Dixon 7.5\u27\u27 Quadrangle, Scott County, Iowa

https://ir.uiowa.edu/igs_ofm/1040/thumbnail.jp

Surficial geologic materials of the Bertram Quadrangle, Iowa

https://ir.uiowa.edu/igs_ofm/1008/thumbnail.jp

Cost and cost-effectiveness of soil-transmitted helminth treatment programmes : systematic review and research needs

Background In this time of rapidly expanding mass drug administration (MDA) coverage and the new commitments for soil-transmitted helminth (STH) control, it is essential that resources are allocated in an efficient manner to have the greatest impact. However, many questions remain regarding how best to deliver STH treatment programmes; these include which age-groups should be targeted and how often. To perform further analyses to investigate what the most cost-effective control strategies are in different settings, accurate cost data for targeting different age groups at different treatment frequencies (in a range of settings) are essential. Methods Using the electronic databases PubMed, MEDLINE, and ISI Web of Knowledge, we perform a systematic review of costing studies and cost-effectiveness evaluations for potential STH treatment strategies. We use this review to highlight research gaps and outline the key future research needs. Results We identified 29 studies reporting costs of STH treatment and 17 studies that investigated its cost-effectiveness. The majority of these pertained to programmes only targeting school-aged children (SAC), with relatively few studies investigating alternative preventive chemotherapy (PCT) treatment strategies. The methods of cost data collection, analysis and reporting were highly variable among the different studies. Only four of the costing studies were found to have high applicability for use in forthcoming economic evaluations. There are also very few studies quantifying the costs of increasing the treatment frequency. Conclusions The absence of cost data and inconsistencies in the collection and analysis methods constitutes a major research gap for STH control. Detailed and accurate costs of targeting different age groups or increasing treatment frequency will be essential to formulate cost-effective public health policy. Defining the most cost-effective control strategies in different settings is of high significance during this period of expanding MDA coverage and new resource commitments for STH control

Analysis of the population-level impact of co-administering ivermectin with albendazole or mebendazole for the control and elimination of Trichuris trichiura.

INTRODUCTION: Soil-transmitted helminth (STH) infections are predominately controlled by providing children with preventive chemotherapy with either albendazole or mebendazole. However, neither has a high efficacy against Trichuris trichiura. This low efficacy limits the overall effectiveness of the current STH control programmes against T. trichiura. It has been demonstrated that co-administering ivermectin with albendazole or mebendazole significantly increases the efficacy of current treatments, which may increase the overall effectiveness of control programmes. METHODS: Using a STH transmission mathematical model, we evaluated the potential impact of co-administering ivermectin with albendazole or mebendazole to treat T. trichiura within a preventive chemotherapy programme targeting children (2-15 year olds). We evaluated the impact in terms of reduction in prevalent infections, mean worm burden, and prevalence of heavy infections. RESULTS: Although the current treatment strategy reduced T. trichiura worm burden and prevalence of heavy infections, due to their poor efficacy the long term impact of preventive chemotherapy for children was smaller compared to the other STH. Co-administering ivermectin increased the projected impact of the preventive chemotherapy programme in terms of all three of the explored metrics, practically in high transmission settings. Furthermore, ivermectin co-administration greatly increased the feasibility of and timeframe for breaking transmission. CONCLUSIONS: Co-administering ivermectin notably increased the projected impact of preventive chemotherapy in high transmission settings and increased the feasibility for breaking transmission. This has important implications for control programmes, some of which may be shifting focus from morbidity control to interruption of transmission, and some of which may be logistically unable to provide preventive chemotherapy twice a year as recommended. However, the benefit of co-administering ivermectin is limited by the fact that 2-5 year olds are often ineligible to receive treatment