Immunosuppression by Platinum Diamines

Platinum diamine dichloride and tetrachloride inhibit the formation of antibody-forming cells in the mouse spleen after injection of sheep red cells. The dichloride is the more effective agent. It acts best when given 2 days after the antigen, which suggests that cells are more sensitive to its action when they are rapidly proliferating than when they are resting. Its dose-response curve is exponential, suggesting that its action is like that of an alkylating agent. Platinum ethylene diamines were relatively ineffective in this system

Increased therapeutic efficiency of a lipid-soluble alkylating agent incorporated in liposomes.

A highly hydrophobic alkylating agent, 1-N,N-bis(beta-bromoethyl) amino-3-methylnaphthalene, given as the free drug in oil, cured a substantial proportion of mice bearing the PC6 myeloma in the dose range 2-7 mg/kg. However, these doses were toxic, and the LD50 was 6-7 mg/kg. When incorporated in liposomes, similar curative effects were obtained at doses of 10-41 mg/kg without material toxicity, even at the highest dose. Liposome entrapment therefore greatly increases the therapeutic efficiency of this agent

In vivo biological activity of the components of haematoporphyrin derivative.

The in vivo biological activity of various fractions and components of haematoporphyrin derivative (HpD) have been determined by measuring the depth of necrosis of implanted tumours in mice exposed to light after the administration of standard doses of porphyrins dissolved in alkali. In this assay, haematoporphyrin, hydroxyethylvinyldeuteroporphyrin and protoporphyrin are inactive, but the mono- and di-acetates of haematoporphyrin (which are major components of HpD) and acetoxyethylvinyldeuteroporphyrin are active. However, the situation appears to be more complex than this. The normal method for preparing HpD for injection involves an alkali treatment which causes hydrolysis and elimination of the acetoxy functions, and the only recognized products (haematoporphyrin, hydroxyethylvinyldeuteroporphyrin and protoporphyrin) are inactive in the in vivo assay. It is concluded that the active component here is a porphyrin, possibly a dimer or oligomer, which is retained on the column during the normal separation by HPLC. This conclusion is supported by the observations that (i) the crude material obtained from the spent column is active without further alkali treatment, and (ii) activity develops over 30 min, when HpD or the mono- or diacetates of haematoporphyrin are treated with sodium bicarbonate in aqueous DMSO. The advantages of working with a pure substance (e.g. haematoporphyrin diacetate) rather than a mixture (HpD) are stressed

Genotoxic mixtures and dissimilar action: Concepts for prediction and assessment

This article has been made available through the Brunel Open Access Publishing Fund. This article is distributed under the terms of the creative commons Attribution license which permits any use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s)and the source are credited.Combinations of genotoxic agents have frequently been assessed without clear assumptions regarding their expected (additive) mixture effects, often leading to claims of synergisms that might in fact be compatible with additivity. We have shown earlier that the combined effects of chemicals, which induce micronuclei (MN) in the cytokinesis-block micronucleus assay in Chinese hamster ovary-K1 cells by a similar mechanism, were additive according to the concept of concentration addition (CA). Here, we extended these studies and investigated for the first time whether valid additivity expectations can be formulated for MN-inducing chemicals that operate through a variety of mechanisms, including aneugens and clastogens (DNA cross-linkers, topoisomerase II inhibitors, minor groove binders). We expected that their effects should follow the additivity principles of independent action (IA). With two mixtures, one composed of various aneugens (colchicine, flubendazole, vinblastine sulphate, griseofulvin, paclitaxel), and another composed of aneugens and clastogens (flubendazole, doxorubicin, etoposide, melphalan and mitomycin C), we observed mixture effects that fell between the additivity predictions derived from CA and IA. We achieved better agreement between observation and prediction by grouping the chemicals into common assessment groups and using hybrid CA/IA prediction models. The combined effects of four dissimilarly acting compounds (flubendazole, paclitaxel, doxorubicin and melphalan) also fell within CA and IA. Two binary mixtures (flubendazole/paclitaxel and flubendazole/doxorubicin) showed effects in reasonable agreement with IA additivity. Our studies provide a systematic basis for the investigation of mixtures that affect endpoints of relevance to genotoxicity and show that their effects are largely additive.UK Food Standards Agenc