A Comparison of DSM-IV and DSM-5 Panel Members' Financial Associations with Industry: A Pernicious Problem Persists

Lisa Cosgrove and Sheldon Krimsky examine the new competing interest disclosure policy of the American Psychiatric Association (APA) and report that DSM panel members still have considerable financial conflicts of interest

Psychoses et cancers :puzzle épidémiologique ou brouillage de l’abord clinique des psychopathologies en oncologie ?

This article is related to the evolution of a specific research, developed during the 20th century. This research is dedicated to assess “the cancer” incidence in the population of “the lunatics”, and more precisely in the “psychotic population”. It describes the paradigm of this research and the progressive definition of its questions. Moreover, it specifies the chosen diagnostic entities that are used in this research development. The highlights that treating the questions as an “epidemiological puzzle” is assuming and reflecting the acquisition of a medical model to think about mental disease. Because of this, in the field of oncology, psychopathology clinical approach has become outdated.SCOPUS: ar.jinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishe

PPAR\gamma activation but not PPAR\gamma haplodeficiency affects proangiogenic potential of endothelial cells and bone marrow-derived progenitors

Background. Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-? (PPAR?) agonists, which have been used as insulin sensitizers in diabetic patients, may improve functions of endothelial cells (ECs). We investigated the effect of PPAR? on angiogenic activities of murine ECs and bone marrow-derived proangiogenic cells (PACs). Methods. PACs were isolated from bone marrow of 10¿12 weeks old, wild type, db/db and PPAR? heterozygous animals. Cells were cultured on fibronectin and gelatin coated dishes in EGM-2MV medium. For in vitro stimulations, rosiglitazone (10 ?mol/L) or GW9662 (10 ?mol/L) were added to 80% confluent cell cultures for 24 hours. Angiogenic potential of PACs and ECs was tested in vitro and in vivo in wound healing assay and hind limb ischemia model. Results. ECs and PACs isolated from diabetic db/db mice displayed a reduced angiogenic potential in ex vivo and in vitro assays, the effect partially rescued by incubation of cells with rosiglitazone (PPAR? activator). Correction of diabetes by administration of rosiglitazone in vivo did not improve angiogenic potential of isolated PACs or ECs. In a hind limb ischemia model we demonstrated that local injection of conditioned media harvested from wild type PACs improved the blood flow restoration in db/db mice, confirming the importance of paracrine action of the bone marrow-derived cells. Transcriptome analysis showed an upregulation of prooxidative and proinflammatory pathways, and downregulation of several proangiogenic genes in db/db PACs. Interestingly, db/db PACs had also a decreased level of PPAR? and changed expression of PPAR?-regulated genes. Using normoglycemic PPAR?+/? mice we demonstrated that reduced expression of PPAR? does not influence neovascularization either in wound healing or in hind limb ischemia models. Conclusions. In summary, activation of PPAR? by rosiglitazone improves angiogenic potential of diabetic ECs and PACs, but decreased expression of PPAR? in diabetes does not impair angiogenesis