8 research outputs found

    The inclusive 56Fe(nu_e,e-)56Co cross section

    Full text link
    We study the 56Fe(nu_e,e^-)56Co cross section for the KARMEN neutrino spectrum. The Gamow-Teller contribution to the cross section is calculated within the shell model, while the forbidden transitions are evaluated within the continuum random phase approximation. We find a total cross section of 2.73 x 10^-40 cm^2, in agreement with the data.Comment: 4 pages, 1 figure. Replaced due to new improved calculation

    Charged-current neutrino-208Pb reactions

    Get PDF
    We present theoretical results on the non flux-averaged 208Pb(νe,e)208Bi^{208}Pb(\nu_{e},e^-)^{208}Bi and 208Pb(νμ,μ)208Bi^{208}Pb(\nu_{\mu},\mu^-)^{208}Bi reaction cross sections, obtained within the charge-exchange Random-Phase-Approximation. A detailed knowledge of these cross sections is important in different contexts. In particular, it is necessary to assess the possibility of using lead as a detector in future experiments on supernova neutrinos, such as OMNIS and LAND, and eventually detect neutrino oscillation signals by exploiting the spectroscopic properties of 208Bi^{208}Bi. We discuss the present status on the theoretical predictions of the reaction cross sections.Comment: 5 pages, latex, 3 figures. added discussion on present status, Submitted to Phys.Rev.

    Shell-model calculations of neutrino scattering from 12C

    Get PDF
    Neutrino reaction cross-sections, (νμ,μ)(\nu_\mu,\mu^-), (νe,e)(\nu_e,e^-), μ\mu-capture and photoabsorption rates on 12^{12}C are computed within a large-basis shell-model framework, which included excitations up to 4ω4\hbar\omega. When ground-state correlations are included with an open pp-shell the predictions of the calculations are in reasonable agreement with most of the experimental results for these reactions. Woods-Saxon radial wave functions are used, with their asymptotic forms matched to the experimental separation energies for bound states, and matched to a binding energy of 0.01 MeV for unbound states. For comparison purposes, some results are given for harmonic oscillator radial functions. Closest agreement between theory and experiment is achieved with unrestricted shell-model configurations and Woods-Saxon radial functions. We obtain for the neutrino-absorption inclusive cross sections: σˉ=13.8×1040\bar{\sigma} = 13.8 \times 10^{-40} cm2^2 for the (νμ,μ)(\nu_{\mu},\mu^{-}) decay-in-flight flux in agreement with the LSND datum of (12.4±1.8)×1040(12.4 \pm 1.8) \times 10^{-40} cm2^2; and σˉ=12.5×1042\bar{\sigma} = 12.5 \times 10^{-42} cm2^2 for the (νe,e)(\nu_{e},e^{-}) decay-at-rest flux, less than the experimental result of (14.4±1.2)×1042(14.4 \pm 1.2) \times 10^{-42} cm2^2.Comment: 19 pages. ReVTeX. No figure

    Microscopic theories of neutrino-^{12}C reactions

    Get PDF
    In view of the recent experiments on neutrino oscillations performed by the LSND and KARMEN collaborations as well as of future experiments, we present new theoretical results of the flux averaged 12C(νe,e)12N^{12}C(\nu_e,e^-)^{12}N and 12C(νμ,μ)12N^{12}C(\nu_{\mu},{\mu}^-)^{12}N cross sections. The approaches used are charge-exchange RPA, charge-exchange RPA among quasi-particles (QRPA) and the Shell Model. With a large-scale shell model calculation the exclusive cross sections are in nice agreement with the experimental values for both reactions. The inclusive cross section for νμ\nu_{\mu} coming from the decay-in-flight of π+\pi^+ is 15.2×1040cm215.2 \times 10^{-40} cm^2 to be compared to the experimental value of 12.4±0.3±1.8×1040cm212.4 \pm 0.3 \pm 1.8 \times 10^{-40} cm^2, while the one due to νe\nu_{e} coming from the decay-at-rest of μ+\mu^+ is 16.4×1042cm216.4 \times 10^{-42} cm^2 which agrees within experimental error bars with the measured values. The shell model prediction for the decay-in-flight neutrino cross section is reduced compared to the RPA one. This is mainly due to the different kind of correlations taken into account in the calculation of the spin modes and partially due to the shell-model configuration basis which is not large enough, as we show using arguments based on sum-rules.Comment: 17 pages, latex, 5 figure

    References

    No full text

    References

    No full text
    corecore