906 research outputs found
Reduced Phase Space Quantization and Dirac Observables
In her recent work, Dittrich generalized Rovelli's idea of partial
observables to construct Dirac observables for constrained systems to the
general case of an arbitrary first class constraint algebra with structure
functions rather than structure constants. Here we use this framework and
propose a new way for how to implement explicitly a reduced phase space
quantization of a given system, at least in principle, without the need to
compute the gauge equivalence classes. The degree of practicality of this
programme depends on the choice of the partial observables involved. The
(multi-fingered) time evolution was shown to correspond to an automorphism on
the set of Dirac observables so generated and interesting representations of
the latter will be those for which a suitable preferred subgroup is realized
unitarily. We sketch how such a programme might look like for General
Relativity. We also observe that the ideas by Dittrich can be used in order to
generate constraints equivalent to those of the Hamiltonian constraints for
General Relativity such that they are spatially diffeomorphism invariant. This
has the important consequence that one can now quantize the new Hamiltonian
constraints on the partially reduced Hilbert space of spatially diffeomorphism
invariant states, just as for the recently proposed Master constraint
programme.Comment: 18 pages, no figure
Testing the Master Constraint Programme for Loop Quantum Gravity IV. Free Field Theories
This is the fourth paper in our series of five in which we test the Master
Constraint Programme for solving the Hamiltonian constraint in Loop Quantum
Gravity. We now move on to free field theories with constraints, namely Maxwell
theory and linearized gravity. Since the Master constraint involves squares of
constraint operator valued distributions, one has to be very careful in doing
that and we will see that the full flexibility of the Master Constraint
Programme must be exploited in order to arrive at sensible results.Comment: 23 pages, no figure
Testing the Master Constraint Programme for Loop Quantum Gravity II. Finite Dimensional Systems
This is the second paper in our series of five in which we test the Master
Constraint Programme for solving the Hamiltonian constraint in Loop Quantum
Gravity. In this work we begin with the simplest examples: Finite dimensional
models with a finite number of first or second class constraints, Abelean or
non -- Abelean, with or without structure functions.Comment: 23 pages, no figure
Quantum Spin Dynamics VIII. The Master Constraint
Recently the Master Constraint Programme (MCP) for Loop Quantum Gravity (LQG)
was launched which replaces the infinite number of Hamiltonian constraints by a
single Master constraint. The MCP is designed to overcome the complications
associated with the non -- Lie -- algebra structure of the Dirac algebra of
Hamiltonian constraints and was successfully tested in various field theory
models. For the case of 3+1 gravity itself, so far only a positive quadratic
form for the Master Constraint Operator was derived. In this paper we close
this gap and prove that the quadratic form is closable and thus stems from a
unique self -- adjoint Master Constraint Operator. The proof rests on a simple
feature of the general pattern according to which Hamiltonian constraints in
LQG are constructed and thus extends to arbitrary matter coupling and holds for
any metric signature. With this result the existence of a physical Hilbert
space for LQG is established by standard spectral analysis.Comment: 19p, no figure
Algebraic Quantum Gravity (AQG) III. Semiclassical Perturbation Theory
In the two previous papers of this series we defined a new combinatorical
approach to quantum gravity, Algebraic Quantum Gravity (AQG). We showed that
AQG reproduces the correct infinitesimal dynamics in the semiclassical limit,
provided one incorrectly substitutes the non -- Abelean group SU(2) by the
Abelean group in the calculations. The mere reason why that
substitution was performed at all is that in the non -- Abelean case the volume
operator, pivotal for the definition of the dynamics, is not diagonisable by
analytical methods. This, in contrast to the Abelean case, so far prohibited
semiclassical computations. In this paper we show why this unjustified
substitution nevertheless reproduces the correct physical result: Namely, we
introduce for the first time semiclassical perturbation theory within AQG (and
LQG) which allows to compute expectation values of interesting operators such
as the master constraint as a power series in with error control. That
is, in particular matrix elements of fractional powers of the volume operator
can be computed with extremely high precision for sufficiently large power of
in the expansion. With this new tool, the non -- Abelean
calculation, although technically more involved, is then exactly analogous to
the Abelean calculation, thus justifying the Abelean analysis in retrospect.
The results of this paper turn AQG into a calculational discipline
Testing the Master Constraint Programme for Loop Quantum Gravity V. Interacting Field Theories
This is the final fifth paper in our series of five in which we test the
Master Constraint Programme for solving the Hamiltonian constraint in Loop
Quantum Gravity. Here we consider interacting quantum field theories,
specificlly we consider the non -- Abelean Gauss constraints of Einstein --
Yang -- Mills theory and 2+1 gravity. Interestingly, while Yang -- Mills theory
in 4D is not yet rigorously defined as an ordinary (Wightman) quantum field
theory on Minkowski space, in background independent quantum field theories
such as Loop Quantum Gravity (LQG) this might become possible by working in a
new, background independent representation.Comment: 20 pages, no figure
Testing the Master Constraint Programme for Loop Quantum Gravity III. SL(2,R) Models
This is the third paper in our series of five in which we test the Master
Constraint Programme for solving the Hamiltonian constraint in Loop Quantum
Gravity. In this work we analyze models which, despite the fact that the phase
space is finite dimensional, are much more complicated than in the second
paper: These are systems with an SL(2,\Rl) gauge symmetry and the
complications arise because non -- compact semisimple Lie groups are not
amenable (have no finite translation invariant measure). This leads to severe
obstacles in the refined algebraic quantization programme (group averaging) and
we see a trace of that in the fact that the spectrum of the Master Constraint
does not contain the point zero. However, the minimum of the spectrum is of
order which can be interpreted as a normal ordering constant arising
from first class constraints (while second class systems lead to normal
ordering constants). The physical Hilbert space can then be be obtained after
subtracting this normal ordering correction.Comment: 33 pages, no figure
A Path-integral for the Master Constraint of Loop Quantum Gravity
In the present paper, we start from the canonical theory of loop quantum
gravity and the master constraint programme. The physical inner product is
expressed by using the group averaging technique for a single self-adjoint
master constraint operator. By the standard technique of skeletonization and
the coherent state path-integral, we derive a path-integral formula from the
group averaging for the master constraint operator. Our derivation in the
present paper suggests there exists a direct link connecting the canonical Loop
quantum gravity with a path-integral quantization or a spin-foam model of
General Relativity.Comment: 19 page
Testing the Master Constraint Programme for Loop Quantum Gravity I. General Framework
Recently the Master Constraint Programme for Loop Quantum Gravity (LQG) was
proposed as a classically equivalent way to impose the infinite number of
Wheeler -- DeWitt constraint equations in terms of a single Master Equation.
While the proposal has some promising abstract features, it was until now
barely tested in known models. In this series of five papers we fill this gap,
thereby adding confidence to the proposal. We consider a wide range of models
with increasingly more complicated constraint algebras, beginning with a finite
dimensional, Abelean algebra of constraint operators which are linear in the
momenta and ending with an infinite dimensional, non-Abelean algebra of
constraint operators which closes with structure functions only and which are
not even polynomial in the momenta. In all these models we apply the Master
Constraint Programme successfully, however, the full flexibility of the method
must be exploited in order to complete our task. This shows that the Master
Constraint Programme has a wide range of applicability but that there are many,
physically interesting subtleties that must be taken care of in doing so. In
this first paper we prepare the analysis of our test models by outlining the
general framework of the Master Constraint Programme. The models themselves
will be studied in the remaining four papers. As a side result we develop the
Direct Integral Decomposition (DID) for solving quantum constraints as an
alternative to Refined Algebraic Quantization (RAQ).Comment: 42 pages, no figure
On (Cosmological) Singularity Avoidance in Loop Quantum Gravity
Loop Quantum Cosmology (LQC), mainly due to Bojowald, is not the cosmological
sector of Loop Quantum Gravity (LQG). Rather, LQC consists of a truncation of
the phase space of classical General Relativity to spatially homogeneous
situations which is then quantized by the methods of LQG. Thus, LQC is a
quantum mechanical toy model (finite number of degrees of freedom) for LQG(a
genuine QFT with an infinite number of degrees of freedom) which provides
important consistency checks. However, it is a non trivial question whether the
predictions of LQC are robust after switching on the inhomogeneous fluctuations
present in full LQG. Two of the most spectacular findings of LQC are that 1.
the inverse scale factor is bounded from above on zero volume eigenstates which
hints at the avoidance of the local curvature singularity and 2. that the
Quantum Einstein Equations are non -- singular which hints at the avoidance of
the global initial singularity. We display the result of a calculation for LQG
which proves that the (analogon of the) inverse scale factor, while densely
defined, is {\it not} bounded from above on zero volume eigenstates. Thus, in
full LQG, if curvature singularity avoidance is realized, then not in this
simple way. In fact, it turns out that the boundedness of the inverse scale
factor is neither necessary nor sufficient for curvature singularity avoidance
and that non -- singular evolution equations are neither necessary nor
sufficient for initial singularity avoidance because none of these criteria are
formulated in terms of observable quantities.After outlining what would be
required, we present the results of a calculation for LQG which could be a
first indication that our criteria at least for curvature singularity avoidance
are satisfied in LQG.Comment: 34 pages, 16 figure
- …