83 research outputs found

    Π Π΅Ρ†ΠΈΠ΄ΠΈΠ² Ρ€Π°ΠΊΠ° ΠΏΠΎΡ‡ΠΊΠΈ: ΠΏΡ€Π΅Π΄ΠΈΠΊΡ‚ΠΎΡ€Ρ‹ ΠΈ Ρ€Π΅Π·ΡƒΠ»ΡŒΡ‚Π°Ρ‚Ρ‹ ΠΏΠΎΠ²Ρ‚ΠΎΡ€Π½ΠΎΠΉ ΠΏΠ°Ρ€Ρ†ΠΈΠ°Π»ΡŒΠ½ΠΎΠΉ нСфрэктомии (ΠΎΠ±Π·ΠΎΡ€ Π»ΠΈΡ‚Π΅Ρ€Π°Ρ‚ΡƒΡ€Ρ‹)

    Get PDF
    In the last ten years, the number of organ preservation surgeries for kidney cancer significantly increased. Per literature data, the incidence of recurrences after partial nephrectomy is between 2.9 and 11 %, mostly they are located in the operated or contralateral kidney. Positive surgical margin, high stage and histological subtype of the tumor, as well as hereditary diseases, can serve as predictors for recurrences. In renal cancer recurrences, radical nephrectomy, ablation therapy and repeat tumor resection are possible treatment methods. Kidney resection, same as in primary renal tumors, leads to chronic kidney disease and cardiovascular complications. Different ablation methods, despite their low invasiveness, are not always technically possible. Therefore, in patients with kidney cancer recurrence and satisfactory functional status, repeat partial nephrectomy can be a method of choice. The literature describes the outcomes of open repeat kidney resection with high incidence of general and severe complications. The number of these complications significantly decreased due to the use of robot-assisted access for resection of recurrent renal tumors. Functional characteristics of repeat kidney resections do not significantly decrease, especially in robot-assisted partial nephrectomy. Oncological outcomes of these surgeries remain intermediate, further prospective multi-center trials are needed for their confirmation.Π—Π° послСднСС дСсятилСтиС количСство ΠΎΡ€Π³Π°Π½ΠΎΡΠΎΡ…Ρ€Π°Π½ΡΡŽΡ‰ΠΈΡ… ΠΎΠΏΠ΅Ρ€Π°Ρ†ΠΈΠΉ ΠΏΡ€ΠΈ Ρ€Π°ΠΊΠ΅ ΠΏΠΎΡ‡ΠΊΠΈ Π·Π½Π°Ρ‡ΠΈΡ‚Π΅Π»ΡŒΠ½ΠΎ ΡƒΠ²Π΅Π»ΠΈΡ‡ΠΈΠ»ΠΎΡΡŒ. По Π΄Π°Π½Π½Ρ‹ΠΌ Π»ΠΈΡ‚Π΅Ρ€Π°Ρ‚ΡƒΡ€Ρ‹, послС ΠΏΠ°Ρ€Ρ†ΠΈΠ°Π»ΡŒΠ½ΠΎΠΉ нСфрэктомии частота Ρ€Π΅Ρ†ΠΈΠ΄ΠΈΠ²ΠΎΠ² колСблСтся ΠΎΡ‚ 2,9 Π΄ΠΎ 11 %, Π² основном ΠΎΠ½ΠΈ Π»ΠΎΠΊΠ°Π»ΠΈΠ·ΡƒΡŽΡ‚ΡΡ Π² ΠΎΠΏΠ΅Ρ€ΠΈΡ€ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½Π½ΠΎΠΉ ΠΈΠ»ΠΈ ΠΊΠΎΠ½Ρ‚Ρ€Π°Π»Π°Ρ‚Π΅Ρ€Π°Π»ΡŒΠ½ΠΎΠΉ ΠΏΠΎΡ‡ΠΊΠ΅. ΠŸΡ€Π΅Π΄ΠΈΠΊΡ‚ΠΎΡ€Π°ΠΌΠΈ ΠΈΡ… развития ΠΌΠΎΠ³ΡƒΡ‚ Π±Ρ‹Ρ‚ΡŒ ΠΏΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠΆΠΈΡ‚Π΅Π»ΡŒΠ½Ρ‹ΠΉ хирургичСский ΠΊΡ€Π°ΠΉ, высокая стадия ΠΈ гистологичСский ΠΏΠΎΠ΄Ρ‚ΠΈΠΏ ΠΎΠΏΡƒΡ…ΠΎΠ»ΠΈ, Π° Ρ‚Π°ΠΊΠΆΠ΅ наслСдствСнныС заболСвания. ΠŸΡ€ΠΈ Ρ€Π΅Ρ†ΠΈΠ΄ΠΈΠ²Π°Ρ… Ρ€Π°ΠΊΠ° ΠΏΠΎΡ‡ΠΊΠΈ Π²ΠΎΠ·ΠΌΠΎΠΆΠ½Ρ‹ Ρ‚Π°ΠΊΠΈΠ΅ Π²Π°Ρ€ΠΈΠ°Π½Ρ‚Ρ‹ лСчСния, ΠΊΠ°ΠΊ Ρ€Π°Π΄ΠΈΠΊΠ°Π»ΡŒΠ½Π°Ρ нСфрэктомия, аблационная тСрапия ΠΈ повторная рСзСкция ΠΎΠΏΡƒΡ…ΠΎΠ»ΠΈ. Π£Π΄Π°Π»Π΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ ΠΏΠΎΡ‡ΠΊΠΈ, ΠΊΠ°ΠΊ ΠΈ ΠΏΡ€ΠΈ ΠΏΠ΅Ρ€Π²ΠΈΡ‡Π½Ρ‹Ρ… Ρ€Π΅Π½Π°Π»ΡŒΠ½Ρ‹Ρ… опухолях, Π²Π΅Π΄Π΅Ρ‚ ΠΊ Ρ€Π°Π·Π²ΠΈΡ‚ΠΈΡŽ хроничСской Π±ΠΎΠ»Π΅Π·Π½ΠΈ ΠΏΠΎΡ‡Π΅ΠΊ ΠΈ сСрдСчно-сосудистых ослоТнСний. Π Π°Π·Π»ΠΈΡ‡Π½Ρ‹Π΅ ΠΌΠ΅Ρ‚ΠΎΠ΄Ρ‹ Π°Π±Π»Π°Ρ†ΠΈΠΈ, нСсмотря Π½Π° ΠΈΡ… ΠΌΠ°Π»ΠΎΠΈΠ½Π²Π°Π·ΠΈΠ²Π½ΠΎΡΡ‚ΡŒ, Π½Π΅ всСгда тСхничСски Π²Ρ‹ΠΏΠΎΠ»Π½ΠΈΠΌΡ‹. ΠŸΠΎΡΡ‚ΠΎΠΌΡƒ Ρƒ ΠΏΠ°Ρ†ΠΈΠ΅Π½Ρ‚ΠΎΠ² с Ρ€Π΅Ρ†ΠΈΠ΄ΠΈΠ²ΠΎΠΌ Ρ€Π°ΠΊΠ° ΠΏΠΎΡ‡ΠΊΠΈ ΠΈ нСотягощСнным соматичСским статусом ΠΌΠ΅Ρ‚ΠΎΠ΄ΠΎΠΌ Π²Ρ‹Π±ΠΎΡ€Π° ΠΌΠΎΠΆΠ΅Ρ‚ Π±Ρ‹Ρ‚ΡŒ повторная ΠΏΠ°Ρ€Ρ†ΠΈΠ°Π»ΡŒΠ½Π°Ρ нСфрэктомия. Π’ Π»ΠΈΡ‚Π΅Ρ€Π°Ρ‚ΡƒΡ€Π΅ описаны Ρ€Π΅Π·ΡƒΠ»ΡŒΡ‚Π°Ρ‚Ρ‹ ΠΎΡ‚ΠΊΡ€Ρ‹Ρ‚ΠΎΠΉ ΠΏΠΎΠ²Ρ‚ΠΎΡ€Π½ΠΎΠΉ Ρ€Π΅Π·Π΅ΠΊΡ†ΠΈΠΈ ΠΏΠΎΡ‡ΠΊΠΈ с высокой частотой ΠΎΠ±Ρ‰ΠΈΡ… ΠΈ ΡΠ΅Ρ€ΡŒΠ΅Π·Π½Ρ‹Ρ… ослоТнСний. ΠšΠΎΠ»ΠΈΡ‡Π΅ΡΡ‚Π²ΠΎ этих ослоТнСний Π·Π½Π°Ρ‡ΠΈΡ‚Π΅Π»ΡŒΠ½ΠΎ ΡƒΠΌΠ΅Π½ΡŒΡˆΠΈΠ»ΠΎΡΡŒ ΠΏΡ€ΠΈ использовании роботичСского доступа для удалСния Ρ€Π΅Ρ†ΠΈΠ΄ΠΈΠ²Π½Ρ‹Ρ… Ρ€Π΅Π½Π°Π»ΡŒΠ½Ρ‹Ρ… ΠΎΠΏΡƒΡ…ΠΎΠ»Π΅ΠΉ. Π€ΡƒΠ½ΠΊΡ†ΠΈΠΎΠ½Π°Π»ΡŒΠ½Ρ‹Π΅ ΠΏΠΎΠΊΠ°Π·Π°Ρ‚Π΅Π»ΠΈ послС ΠΏΠΎΠ²Ρ‚ΠΎΡ€Π½Ρ‹Ρ… Ρ€Π΅Π·Π΅ΠΊΡ†ΠΈΠΉ ΠΏΠΎΡ‡ΠΊΠΈ ΡƒΡ…ΡƒΠ΄ΡˆΠ°ΡŽΡ‚ΡΡ Π½Π΅Π·Π½Π°Ρ‡ΠΈΡ‚Π΅Π»ΡŒΠ½ΠΎ, особСнно ΠΏΡ€ΠΈ Ρ€ΠΎΠ±ΠΎΡ‚-ассистированной ΠΏΠ°Ρ€Ρ†ΠΈΠ°Π»ΡŒΠ½ΠΎΠΉ нСфрэктомии. ΠžΠ½ΠΊΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ³ΠΈΡ‡Π΅ΡΠΊΠΈΠ΅ Ρ€Π΅Π·ΡƒΠ»ΡŒΡ‚Π°Ρ‚Ρ‹ Π΄Π°Π½Π½Ρ‹Ρ… ΠΎΠΏΠ΅Ρ€Π°Ρ†ΠΈΠΉ ΡΠ²Π»ΡΡŽΡ‚ΡΡ Π΅Ρ‰Π΅ ΠΏΡ€ΠΎΠΌΠ΅ΠΆΡƒΡ‚ΠΎΡ‡Π½Ρ‹ΠΌΠΈ, для ΠΈΡ… подтвСрТдСния Π½Π΅ΠΎΠ±Ρ…ΠΎΠ΄ΠΈΠΌΡ‹ дальнСйшиС проспСктивныС исслСдования

    Π ΠΎΠ±ΠΎΡ‚-ассистированная повторная рСзСкция Ρ€Π΅Ρ†ΠΈΠ΄ΠΈΠ²Π½Ρ‹Ρ… ΠΎΠΏΡƒΡ…ΠΎΠ»Π΅ΠΉ ΠΏΠΎΡ‡ΠΊΠΈ

    Get PDF
    Background. Currently, organ-preserving surgery of kidney tumors often involves robot-assisted access. It can also be used in partial nephrectomy in patients with local recurrence after previous resection.Aim. To evaluate the effectiveness of repeat robot-assisted partial nephrectomy of recurrent kidney tumors.Materials and methods. At the Urology Center of the Mariinsky Hospital (Saint Petersburg) between 2018 and 2022 robot-assisted partial nephrectomy was performed in 86 patients (46 (59.5 %) men and 40 (40.5 %) women) with stage Π’1Π° (n = 72) and Tib (n = 14) kidney tumors. Mean patient age was 58.0 Β± 8.5 years, tumor size varied between 1.2 and 5.2 cm. Seven (7) patients were operated on due to tumor recurrence after previously performed partial nephrectomy. In all cases, lesion was located outside the site of primary resection. Mean time between the 1st and 2nd surgeries was 24 (12-46) months. Histological examination of primary tumor showed renal cell carcinoma in 4 patients, papillary carcinoma in 2 patients, chromophobe carcinoma in 1 patient. In 5 patients, one recurrent lesion was diagnosed, in 2 patients - two. Ligation of the renal artery was performed in 2 patients, its branch - in 3, ischemia-free resection - in 2 patients. Evaluation of mean operating time, blood loss volume, warm ischemia time, pre- and postoperative kidney function was performed.Results. Mean operating time of repeat partial nephrectomy was 180 (130-210) minutes. Warm ischemia time for renal artery ligation was 16 and 20 minutes, for selective ischemia 14, 18 and 24 minutes. Mean blood loss volume was 220 (80-650) ml. No intraoperative complications were observed, grade I-II postoperative complications per the Clavien classification were observed in 2 patients. Mean decrease in glomerular filtration time was 8 % (from 62 to 54 mL/min/1.73 m2). During 16-month follow up period, tumor recurrence was not observed.Conclusion. Robotic access allows to safely and effectively perform resection of recurrent kidney tumors with satisfactory functional and intermediate oncological outcomes.Π’Π²Π΅Π΄Π΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅. Π’ настоящСС врСмя ΠΏΡ€ΠΈ ΠΎΡ€Π³Π°Π½ΠΎΡΠΎΡ…Ρ€Π°Π½ΡΡŽΡ‰Π΅ΠΉ Ρ…ΠΈΡ€ΡƒΡ€Π³ΠΈΠΈ ΠΎΠΏΡƒΡ…ΠΎΠ»Π΅ΠΉ ΠΏΠΎΡ‡ΠΊΠΈ Π°ΠΊΡ‚ΠΈΠ²Π½ΠΎ примСняСтся Ρ€ΠΎΠ±ΠΎΡ‚-ассистированный доступ. Π’Π°ΠΊΠΆΠ΅ Π΅Π³ΠΎ ΠΌΠΎΠΆΠ½ΠΎ ΠΈΡΠΏΠΎΠ»ΡŒΠ·ΠΎΠ²Π°Ρ‚ΡŒ ΠΏΡ€ΠΈ ΠΏΠ°Ρ€Ρ†ΠΈΠ°Π»ΡŒΠ½ΠΎΠΉ нСфрэктомии Ρƒ Π±ΠΎΠ»ΡŒΠ½Ρ‹Ρ… с мСстным Ρ€Π΅Ρ†ΠΈΠ΄ΠΈΠ²ΠΎΠΌ послС ΠΏΡ€Π΅Π΄Ρ‹Π΄ΡƒΡ‰Π΅ΠΉ Ρ€Π΅Π·Π΅ΠΊΡ†ΠΈΠΈ.ЦСль исслСдования - ΠΎΡ†Π΅Π½ΠΊΠ° эффСктивности ΠΏΠΎΠ²Ρ‚ΠΎΡ€Π½ΠΎΠΉ Ρ€ΠΎΠ±ΠΎΡ‚-ассистированной ΠΏΠ°Ρ€Ρ†ΠΈΠ°Π»ΡŒΠ½ΠΎΠΉ нСфрэктомии Ρ€Π΅Ρ†ΠΈΠ΄ΠΈΠ²Π½Ρ‹Ρ… ΠΎΠΏΡƒΡ…ΠΎΠ»Π΅ΠΉ ΠΏΠΎΡ‡ΠΊΠΈ.ΠœΠ°Ρ‚Π΅Ρ€ΠΈΠ°Π»Ρ‹ ΠΈ ΠΌΠ΅Ρ‚ΠΎΠ΄Ρ‹. Π’ Ρ†Π΅Π½Ρ‚Ρ€Π΅ ΡƒΡ€ΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ³ΠΈΠΈ ΠœΠ°Ρ€ΠΈΠΈΠ½ΡΠΊΠΎΠΉ Π±ΠΎΠ»ΡŒΠ½ΠΈΡ†Ρ‹ (Π‘Π°Π½ΠΊΡ‚-ΠŸΠ΅Ρ‚Π΅Ρ€Π±ΡƒΡ€Π³) с 2018 ΠΏΠΎ 2022 Π³. Ρ€ΠΎΠ±ΠΎΡ‚-ассистированная ΠΏΠ°Ρ€Ρ†ΠΈΠ°Π»ΡŒΠ½Π°Ρ нСфрэктомия Π±Ρ‹Π»Π° Π²Ρ‹ΠΏΠΎΠ»Π½Π΅Π½Π° 86 Π±ΠΎΠ»ΡŒΠ½Ρ‹ΠΌ (46 (59,5 %) ΠΌΡƒΠΆΡ‡ΠΈΠ½Π°ΠΌ ΠΈ 40 (40,5 %) ΠΆΠ΅Π½Ρ‰ΠΈΠ½Π°ΠΌ) с ΠΎΠΏΡƒΡ…ΠΎΠ»ΡŒΡŽ ΠΏΠΎΡ‡ΠΊΠΈ стадий Π’1Π° (n = 72) ΠΈ T1b (n = 14). Π‘Ρ€Π΅Π΄Π½ΠΈΠΉ возраст ΠΏΠ°Ρ†ΠΈΠ΅Π½Ρ‚ΠΎΠ² составил 58,0 Β± 8,5 Π³ΠΎΠ΄Π°, Ρ€Π°Π·ΠΌΠ΅Ρ€ ΠΎΠΏΡƒΡ…ΠΎΠ»ΠΈ колСбался ΠΎΡ‚ 1,2 Π΄ΠΎ 5,2 см. По ΠΏΠΎΠ²ΠΎΠ΄Ρƒ Ρ€Π΅Ρ†ΠΈΠ΄ΠΈΠ²Π° ΠΎΠΏΡƒΡ…ΠΎΠ»ΠΈ послС Π²Ρ‹ΠΏΠΎΠ»Π½Π΅Π½Π½ΠΎΠΉ Ρ€Π°Π½Π΅Π΅ ΠΏΠ°Ρ€Ρ†ΠΈΠ°Π»ΡŒΠ½ΠΎΠΉ нСфрэктомии Π±Ρ‹Π»ΠΈ ΠΎΠΏΠ΅Ρ€ΠΈΡ€ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½Ρ‹ 7 Π±ΠΎΠ»ΡŒΠ½Ρ‹Ρ…. Π’ΠΎ всСх случаях ΠΎΠ±Ρ€Π°Π·ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΠ΅ Ρ€Π°ΡΠΏΠΎΠ»Π°Π³Π°Π»ΠΎΡΡŒ Π²Π½Π΅ Π·ΠΎΠ½Ρ‹ ΠΏΠ΅Ρ€Π²ΠΈΡ‡Π½ΠΎΠΉ Ρ€Π΅Π·Π΅ΠΊΡ†ΠΈΠΈ. ВрСмя ΠΌΠ΅ΠΆΠ΄Ρƒ 1-ΠΉ ΠΈ 2-ΠΉ опСрациями составило Π² срСднСм 24 (12-46) мСс. ΠŸΡ€ΠΈ гистологичСском исслСдовании Ρƒ 4 Π±ΠΎΠ»ΡŒΠ½Ρ‹Ρ… ΠΈΠ·Π½Π°Ρ‡Π°Π»ΡŒΠ½ΠΎ Π±Ρ‹Π» выявлСн ΠΏΠΎΡ‡Π΅Ρ‡Π½ΠΎ-ΠΊΠ»Π΅Ρ‚ΠΎΡ‡Π½Ρ‹ΠΉ, Ρƒ 2 - папиллярный, Ρƒ 1 - Ρ…Ρ€ΠΎΠΌΠΎΡ„ΠΎΠ±Π½Ρ‹ΠΉ Ρ€Π°ΠΊ ΠΏΠΎΡ‡ΠΊΠΈ. Π£ 5 ΠΏΠ°Ρ†ΠΈΠ΅Π½Ρ‚ΠΎΠ² диагностировано ΠΎΠ΄Π½ΠΎ Ρ€Π΅Ρ†ΠΈΠ΄ΠΈΠ²Π½ΠΎΠ΅ ΠΎΠ±Ρ€Π°Π·ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΠ΅, Ρƒ 2 - Π΄Π²Π°. ΠŸΠ΅Ρ€Π΅ΠΆΠ°Ρ‚ΠΈΠ΅ ΠΏΠΎΡ‡Π΅Ρ‡Π½ΠΎΠΉ Π°Ρ€Ρ‚Π΅Ρ€ΠΈΠΈ ΠΏΡ€ΠΎΠ²ΠΎΠ΄ΠΈΠ»ΠΎΡΡŒ Ρƒ 2, Π΅Π΅ Π²Π΅Ρ‚Π²ΠΈ - Ρƒ 3, Π±Π΅Π·Ρ‹ΡˆΠ΅ΠΌΠΈΡ‡Π΅ΡΠΊΠ°Ρ рСзСкция - Ρƒ 2 ΠΏΠ°Ρ†ΠΈΠ΅Π½Ρ‚ΠΎΠ². Выполняли ΠΎΡ†Π΅Π½ΠΊΡƒ срСднСй ΠΏΡ€ΠΎΠ΄ΠΎΠ»ΠΆΠΈΡ‚Π΅Π»ΡŒΠ½ΠΎΡΡ‚ΠΈ ΠΎΠΏΠ΅Ρ€Π°Ρ†ΠΈΠΈ, объСма ΠΊΡ€ΠΎΠ²ΠΎΠΏΠΎΡ‚Π΅Ρ€ΠΈ, Π²Ρ€Π΅ΠΌΠ΅Π½ΠΈ Ρ‚Π΅ΠΏΠ»ΠΎΠ²ΠΎΠΉ ишСмии, ΠΏΡ€Π΅Π΄- ΠΈ послСопСрационной Ρ„ΡƒΠ½ΠΊΡ†ΠΈΠΈ ΠΏΠΎΡ‡Π΅ΠΊ.Π Π΅Π·ΡƒΠ»ΡŒΡ‚Π°Ρ‚Ρ‹. Π‘Ρ€Π΅Π΄Π½Π΅Π΅ врСмя ΠΎΠΏΠ΅Ρ€Π°Ρ†ΠΈΠΈ ΠΏΡ€ΠΈ ΠΏΠΎΠ²Ρ‚ΠΎΡ€Π½ΠΎΠΉ ΠΏΠ°Ρ€Ρ†ΠΈΠ°Π»ΡŒΠ½ΠΎΠΉ нСфрэктомии составило 180 (130-210) ΠΌΠΈΠ½. ВрСмя Ρ‚Π΅ΠΏΠ»ΠΎΠ²ΠΎΠΉ ишСмии ΠΏΡ€ΠΈ ΠΏΠ΅Ρ€Π΅ΠΆΠ°Ρ‚ΠΈΠΈ ΠΏΠΎΡ‡Π΅Ρ‡Π½ΠΎΠΉ Π°Ρ€Ρ‚Π΅Ρ€ΠΈΠΈ составило 16 ΠΈ 20 ΠΌΠΈΠ½, ΠΏΡ€ΠΈ сСлСктивной ишСмии - 14, 18 ΠΈ 24 ΠΌΠΈΠ½. Π‘Ρ€Π΅Π΄Π½ΠΈΠΉ объСм ΠΊΡ€ΠΎΠ²ΠΎΠΏΠΎΡ‚Π΅Ρ€ΠΈ - 220 (80-650) ΠΌΠ». Π˜Π½Ρ‚Ρ€Π°ΠΎΠΏΠ΅Ρ€Π°Ρ†ΠΈΠΎΠ½Π½Ρ‹Ρ… ослоТнСний Π½Π΅ зафиксировано, послСопСрационныС ослоТнСния I-II стСпСнСй ΠΏΠΎ классификации Clavien наблюдались Ρƒ 2 Π±ΠΎΠ»ΡŒΠ½Ρ‹Ρ…. Π‘ΠΊΠΎΡ€ΠΎΡΡ‚ΡŒ ΠΊΠ»ΡƒΠ±ΠΎΡ‡ΠΊΠΎΠ²ΠΎΠΉ Ρ„ΠΈΠ»ΡŒΡ‚Ρ€Π°Ρ†ΠΈΠΈ снизилась Π² срСднСм Π½Π° 8 % (с 62 Π΄ΠΎ 54 ΠΌΠ»/ΠΌΠΈΠ½/1,73 ΠΌ2). Π—Π° ΠΏΠ΅Ρ€ΠΈΠΎΠ΄ наблюдСния 16 мСс Ρ€Π΅Ρ†ΠΈΠ΄ΠΈΠ²Π° ΠΎΠΏΡƒΡ…ΠΎΠ»ΠΈ Π½Π΅ выявлСно.Π—Π°ΠΊΠ»ΡŽΡ‡Π΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅. РоботичСский доступ позволяСт бСзопасно ΠΈ эффСктивно Π²Ρ‹ΠΏΠΎΠ»Π½ΠΈΡ‚ΡŒ Ρ€Π΅Π·Π΅ΠΊΡ†ΠΈΡŽ Ρ€Π΅Ρ†ΠΈΠ΄ΠΈΠ²Π½ΠΎΠΉ ΠΎΠΏΡƒΡ…ΠΎΠ»ΠΈ ΠΏΠΎΡ‡ΠΊΠΈ с ΡƒΠ΄ΠΎΠ²Π»Π΅Ρ‚Π²ΠΎΡ€ΠΈΡ‚Π΅Π»ΡŒΠ½Ρ‹ΠΌΠΈ Ρ„ΡƒΠ½ΠΊΡ†ΠΈΠΎΠ½Π°Π»ΡŒΠ½Ρ‹ΠΌΠΈ ΠΈ ΠΏΡ€ΠΎΠΌΠ΅ΠΆΡƒΡ‚ΠΎΡ‡Π½Ρ‹ΠΌΠΈ онкологичСскими Ρ€Π΅Π·ΡƒΠ»ΡŒΡ‚Π°Ρ‚Π°ΠΌΠΈ

    The three-dimensional reconstruction of the dilated renal pelvicalyceal system by non-enhanced computed tomography

    Get PDF
    Introduction. The three-dimensional reconstruction of the renal pelvicalyceal system (PCS) is possible when performing enhanced computed tomography (CT). However, the use of a contrast agent has its limitations associated with the presence of allergy and chronic kidney disease.Purpose of the study. To describe the method of semi-autonomous three-dimensional (3D) reconstruction of the PCS based on non-enhanced CT images of patients with upper urinary tract obstruction.Materials and methods. Five patients diagnosed with renal colic were recruited from April-May 2021. All patients underwent CT-urography after informed consent. Medical Imaging Interaction Toolkit program (MITK) expanded with explainable update were used for 3D-reconstruction of PCS via excretory and native phases. To assess the accuracy of the latter, both contrast and non-contrast models were compared regarding their surface area. Also, the PCS of one patient was used to reconstruct virtual endoscopic views based on enhanced and non-enhanced models. Five urologists estimated their similarity and potential use of non-enhanced models for the interventional planning via a Likert scale questionnaire. The resulting models were also analyzed by programmer-engineers to test their suitability for 3D-printing.Results. The average surface area of enhanced and non-enhanced models was 3291 mm2 and 2879 mm2, respectively. Obtained models were suitable for their intraluminal reconstruction and potential 3D-printing. Analyzed properties of non-enhanced models were estimated at 4.5 out of 5.0.Conclusion. The described semi-autonomous reconstruction of the renal PCS based on non-enhanced CT images allows for a short time to reconstruct its 3D-view in patients with the upper urinary tract obstruction

    Nephrostomy tube misplacement in the inferior vena cava following percutaneous nephrostomy

    Get PDF
    Percutaneous renal interventions are characterized by bleeding and infectious complications, as well as trauma to organs located near the kidney, renal or inferior vena cava (IVC). The article presents a clinical observation of a rare complication of percutaneous nephrostomy (PCN), i.e. migration of the distal end of the nephrostomy tube into the IVC. Its timely removal followed by re-nephrostomy made it possible to avoid bleeding and restore drainage of the pyelocalyceal system. Along with this, the article presents a literature review on this condition in the eLibrary, Springer, MedLine, Embase, UpToDate databases from 2000 to 2021. The indications for PCN, the frequency and risk factors of IVC damage during percutaneous renal interventions, as well as treatment tactics were studied. After the initial evaluation of the literature, ten articles were selected for further analysis. The main risk factors associated with IVC perforation after PCN include the surgeon's lack of experience in instrumental imaging, misjudgment of the length of the nephrostomy tube, and its insertion depth, resulting in its inadequate placement. Removal of the nephrostomy tube from the IVC under radiological and ultrasound guidance or open surgery are the main methods to correct for this complication

    Retrograde endoscopic-assisted percutaneous treatment of transplanted kidney calyceal fistula

    Get PDF
    Introduction. Calyceal fistula is a rare complication of a renal transplantation. This complication can lead to postoperative graft failure. The treatment approaches range from a partial nephrectomy to a routine nephrostomy.Objective. To present the successful application of the retrograde endoscopic-assisted percutaneous treatment of transplanted kidney calyceal fistula.Clinical case. A patient after kidney allotransplantation is under our care. Control postoperative ultrasound examination revealed a pararenal fluid mass in the left iliac region. Its percutaneous drainage was performed. Biochemical analysis revealed high levels of creatinine and urea in the drainage discharge. Despite ureteral stent and urethral catheter drainage, about 500 to 600 ml of urine per day was excreted by the drainage. Percutaneous puncture nephrostomy could not be performed due to the absence of dilatation of the renal cavity system. In the lithotomic position, the damaged calyx was identified by performing flexible ureteropyeloscopy. Then we percutaneously targeted the injured calyx and the distal end of the ureteroscope inserted transurethrally, so that the needle tip appeared in the paranephral cavity opposite the injured calyx. Under the control of a flexible ureteroscope the needle was inserted into the kidney pelvis, a nephrostomy tube 12 Ch was placed along the string. The discharge through the drain stopped within a week and it was removed. Follow-up examination nine weeks after surgery revealed that the patient had no complaints and renal ultrasound showed no features, so the nephrostomy tube was removed.Conclusion. The described method is the minimally invasive, affordable, and efficient method for the treatment of transplanted kidney calyceal fistula

    Robot-assisted pyeloplasty with buccal mucosa graft for the management of an extended recurrent ureteropelvic junction stricture

    Get PDF
    A clinical case of robot-assisted pyeloplasty with buccal mucosa graft of an extended recurrent stricture of the left ureteropelvic junction is presented. The patient had previously undergone left-sided laparoscopic antevasal pyeloplasty and retrograde endopyelotomies with ureteral stenting. However, after these interventions, the dilatation of the left pelvicalyceal system persisted, the patient complained of lumbar pain and periodic exacerbations of chronic pyelonephritis. Transperitoneal robotic access isolated the ureteral upper third and the ureteropelvic junction from scar tissue, after dissecting the narrowed ureteral section, its length was about 3.0 cm. In this regard, plastic surgery was performed with a buccal mucosa graft, the ureter was drained with a stent. There were no postoperative complications, and on day 3 the patient was discharged. The stent was removed 4 weeks after. During the control ultrasound examination, the renal pelvicalyceal system was relatively reduced, and the patient did not notice any pain
    • …
    corecore