103 research outputs found
Let It Out (LIO) study: protocol for a mixed-methods study to optimise the design and assess the feasibility of an online emotional disclosure-based intervention in UK hospices
INTRODUCTION: The current COVID-19 pandemic has forced hospices to look for more ways to support people remotely, including psychological support. Emotional disclosure-based interventions hold potential as a way of providing support remotely. However, evidence of their efficacy in people with terminal illness is mixed. Reviews have highlighted this may be due to interventions not being tailored to the unique needs of this population. In response to this, we are developing Let It Out (LIO), an online, self-guided emotional disclosure-based intervention tailored for people living with terminal illness. AIMS: The primary objective of the study is to optimise the design of the LIO intervention. Secondary objectives include assessing its acceptability and feasibility; exploring potential impact on well-being; identifying potential adverse effects; and informing choice of outcome measures for potential future evaluation. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: A single arm, mixed-methods, multisite, longitudinal study. Up to 40 people living with a terminal illness under the care of hospices in England and Scotland will receive the online LIO intervention. LIO consists of 3, self-guided expression sessions over 2 weeks. The primary outcome measures are (1) a structured feedback form completed by participants after the final expression session; and (2) semi-structured interviews and focus groups with ≤15 patient participants, ≤30 hospice staff and ≤15 informal carers. These quantitative and qualitative data will be triangulated via process evaluation to inform optimisation of the intervention design. Secondary outcome measures include validated measures of physical and psychological health collected at baseline and after the final expression session (immediately, 1, 4 and 8 weeks after); and data on recruitment, retention and fidelity. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study is approved by the University College London Research Ethics Committee (reference: 15281/002). The findings will be shared through peer-reviewed scientific journals and conferences, and traditional, online and social media platforms
The effectiveness of interventions to improve the care and management of people with dementia in general hospitals: a systematic review
Background:
People with dementia are at greater risk of being admitted to hospital where care may not be tailored to their needs. Interventions improving care and management are vital.
Aim:
Assess the effectiveness of interventions designed to improve the care and management of people with dementia in hospital.
Method:
Six medical and trial registry, and grey literature databases were searched (1999‐1998/2018). Search terms included “Dementia,” “Hospital,” and “Intervention” and limited to experimental designs. Interventions designed to improve the care and management of people with dementia in the general hospital setting were examined. Outcomes included behavioural and psychological symptoms of dementia (BPSD), psychosocial, clinical, staff knowledge, and length of hospital stay. The CASP tools, Cochrane risk of bias tool, and GRADE system assessed methodological quality and certainty of evidence.
Results:
9003 unique citations were identified; 24 studies were included. Studies were limited in study design and their conduct was at a risk of bias. There is very low‐quality evidence that multisensory behaviour therapy reduces BPSD. There is low‐quality evidence that a multidisciplinary programme reduces postoperative complications and that robot‐assisted therapy, music therapy, multimodal‐comprehensive care, person‐centred care, and family‐centred function‐focused care interventions improved staff knowledge, competence, efficacy, and communication. No studies reported reduced length of stay.
Conclusions:
Whilst we found that these interventions improved the care and management of people with dementia in hospital, it was low‐ to very low‐quality evidence. New clinical recommendations cannot be made based on current evidence, and robust trial designs are necessary to inform evidence‐based care
Defining end of life in dementia: A systematic review
BACKGROUND: Dementia is a life-limiting condition that affects 50 million people globally. Existing definitions of end of life do not account for the uncertain trajectory of dementia. People living with dementia may live in the advanced stage for several years, or even die before they reach the advanced stage of dementia.
AIM:
To identify how end of life in people with dementia is measured and conceptualised, and to identify the factors that contribute towards identifying end of life in people with dementia.
DESIGN:
Systematic review and narrative synthesis. A protocol was registered with the PROSPERO database (CRD42020183968).
DATA SOURCES:
Electronic databases MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsychInfo and CINAHL, were searched in April 2020. Eligible studies included adults with any dementia diagnosis, family carers and healthcare professionals caring for people with dementia, and a definition for end of life in dementia.
RESULTS: Thirty-three studies met the inclusion criteria. Various cut-off scores from validated tools, estimated prognoses and descriptive definitions were used to define end of life. Most studies used single measure tools which focused on cognition or function. There was no pattern across care settings in how end of life was defined. Healthcare professionals and family carers had difficulty recognising when people with dementia were approaching the end of life.
CONCLUSIONS:
End-of-life care and research that focuses only on cognitive and functional decline may fail to recognise the complexities and unmet needs relevant to dementia and end of life. Research and clinical practice should adopt a needs-based approach for people with dementia and not define end of life by stage of disease
Access to and adequacy of psychological services for adult patients in UK hospices: a national, cross-sectional survey
Abstract Background Providing psychological support to people living with terminal illness is a fundamental part of hospice care. Recent research on delivery of psychological services in hospices in the United Kingdom (UK) on a national level, including inequalities or variation in practice, is limited. A nationwide survey will highlight any differences in provision and in doing so help focus future research and inform best practice both within the UK, and internationally. The specific objectives of this survey are to (1) chart the types of psychological support available to adult patients in hospices in the UK in line with the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence model; (2) explore how services are organised; and (3) gather service perspectives on adequacy of care, and facilitators and barriers to appropriate practice. Methods A cross-sectional online survey emailed to adult hospices in the UK in November–December 2019. One staff member involved in the delivery and/or organisation of psychological support was invited to participate per hospice. Of 193 invited hospices, 116 took part. Results Sixteen percent rated their hospice psychological service as wholly adequate. The majority reported that services can access specialist professionals, but many relied on external referrals. Barriers to best practice included funding and staff capacity; facilitators included clear referral structures, audit and appropriate needs and outcome assessments. Conclusions Access to psychological professionals has improved since the last survey 15 years ago, but the majority of responders felt their overall service was not wholly adequate. Basic emotional support is largely felt to be sufficient, but our results indicate a need for improvements in access to more specialist care. Partnerships with external mental health services may be key. Our findings highlight core facilitators and barriers to providing good psychological care at the end of life that should be considered by services both within the UK and on an international level. </jats:sec
Context, mechanisms and outcomes in end-of-life care for people with advanced dementia: family carers perspective
Background: Keeping people living with advanced dementia in their usual place of residence is becoming a key
governmental goal but to achieve this, family carers and health care professionals must negotiate how to provide
optimal care. Previously, we reported a realist analysis of the health care professional perspective. Here, we report
on family carer perspectives. We aimed to understand the similarities and differences between the two
perspectives, gain insights into how the interdependent roles of family carers and HCPs can be optimised, and
make recommendations for policy and practice.
Method: Qualitative study using a realist approach in which we used the criteria from guidance on optimal palliative
care in advanced dementia to examine key contexts, mechanisms and outcomes highlighted by family carers.
Results: The themes and views of family caregivers resonate with those of health care professionals. Their overlapping
anxieties related to business-driven care homes, uncertainty of families when making EOL decisions and the
importance of symptom management referring to contexts, mechanisms and outcomes, respectively. Contexts specific
to family carers were ad hoc information about services, dementia progression and access to funding. Not all family
carers identified dementia as terminal, but many recognised the importance of continuity of care and knowing the
wishes of the person with dementia. New mechanisms included specific resources for improving EOL care and barriers
to discussing and planning for future care. Family carers identified the importance of comfort, being present, the
meeting of basic care needs and feeling the right decisions have been made as good outcomes of care.
Conclusions: Family carers and health care professionals share similar concerns about the challenges to good EOL
dementia care. Better understanding of the effects of dementia at the advanced stages would improve confidence in
EOL care and reduce uncertainty in decision making for family carers and health care professionals
Emotional disclosure as a therapeutic intervention in palliative care: a scoping review protocol
Introduction Emotional disclosure (ED) is a term used
to describe the therapeutic expression of emotion. ED
underlies a variety of therapies aimed at improving
well-being for various populations, including people with
palliative-stage disease and their family carers. Systematic
reviews of ED-based psychotherapy have largely focused
on expressive writing as a way of generating ED. However,
heterogeneity in intervention format and outcome
measures has made it difficult to analyse efficacy. There is
also debate about the mechanisms proposed to explain the
potential effects of ED.
We present a scoping review protocol to develop a
taxonomy of ED-based interventions to identify and
categorise the spectrum of interventions that could
be classified under the umbrella term of ‘emotional
disclosure’ in the palliative care setting. By mapping these
to associated treatment objectives, outcome measures
and explanatory frameworks, the review will inform future
efforts to design and evaluate ED-based therapies in this
population.
Methods and analysis The review will be guided
by Arksey and O’Malley’s five-stage scoping review
framework and Levac’s extension. The following electronic
databases will be searched from database inception:
CENTRAL, the Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied
Health Literature (CINAHL), PsycINFO, Scopus, Web of
Science and MEDLINE. We will include peer-reviewed
studies and reviews. We will also check grey literature,
including clinical trial registers, conference proceedings
and reference lists, as well as contacting researchers.
Articles will be screened by at least two independent
reviewers and data charted using an extraction form
developed for this review. Results will be analysed
thematically to create a taxonomy of interventions,
outcome measures and theoretical frameworks.
Ethics and dissemination This review does not require
ethical approval as it is a secondary analysis of preexisting,
published data. The results will inform future
research in the development of ED-based interventions
and evaluation of their efficacy in the palliative care
setting. We will disseminate findings through peerreviewed
journals
Healthcare utilization and monetary costs associated with agitation in UK care home residents with advanced dementia: a prospective cohort study
OBJECTIVE:
Nearly half of care home residents with advanced dementia have clinically significant agitation. Little is known about costs associated with these symptoms toward the end of life. We calculated monetary costs associated with agitation from UK National Health Service, personal social services, and societal perspectives.
DESIGN:
Prospective cohort study.
SETTING:
Thirteen nursing homes in London and the southeast of England.
PARTICIPANTS:
Seventy-nine people with advanced dementia (Functional Assessment Staging Tool grade 6e and above) residing in nursing homes, and thirty-five of their informal carers.
MEASUREMENTS:
Data collected at study entry and monthly for up to 9 months, extrapolated for expression per annum. Agitation was assessed using the Cohen-Mansfield Agitation Inventory (CMAI). Health and social care costs of residing in care homes, and costs of contacts with health and social care services were calculated from national unit costs; for a societal perspective, costs of providing informal care were estimated using the resource utilization in dementia (RUD)-Lite scale.
RESULTS:
After adjustment, health and social care costs, and costs of providing informal care varied significantly by level of agitation as death approached, from £23,000 over a 1-year period with no agitation symptoms (CMAI agitation score 0–10) to £45,000 at the most severe level (CMAI agitation score >100). On average, agitation accounted for 30% of health and social care costs. Informal care costs were substantial, constituting 29% of total costs.
CONCLUSIONS:
With the increasing prevalence of dementia, costs of care will impact on healthcare and social services systems, as well as informal carers. Agitation is a key driver of these costs in people with advanced dementia presenting complex challenges for symptom management, service planners, and providers
The Friedmann-Lemaitre-Robertson-Walker Big Bang singularities are well behaved
We show that the Big Bang singularity of the
Friedmann-Lemaitre-Robertson-Walker model does not raise major problems to
General Relativity. We prove a theorem showing that the Einstein equation can
be written in a non-singular form, which allows the extension of the spacetime
before the Big Bang. The physical interpretation of the fields used is
discussed. These results follow from our research on singular semi-Riemannian
geometry and singular General Relativity.Comment: 10 pages, 5 figure
The factor structure of the Forms of Self-Criticising/Attacking & Self-Reassuring Scale in thirteen distinct populations
There is considerable evidence that self-criticism plays a major role in the vulnerability to and recovery from psychopathology. Methods to measure this process, and its change over time, are therefore important for research in psychopathology and well-being. This study examined the factor structure of a widely used measure, the Forms of Self-Criticising/Attacking & Self-Reassuring Scale in thirteen nonclinical samples (N = 7510) from twelve different countries: Australia (N = 319), Canada (N = 383), Switzerland (N = 230), Israel (N = 476), Italy (N = 389), Japan (N = 264), the Netherlands (N = 360), Portugal (N = 764), Slovakia (N = 1326), Taiwan (N = 417), the United Kingdom 1 (N = 1570), the United Kingdom 2 (N = 883), and USA (N = 331). This study used more advanced analyses than prior reports: a bifactor item-response theory model, a two-tier item-response theory model, and a non-parametric item-response theory (Mokken) scale analysis. Although the original three-factor solution for the FSCRS (distinguishing between Inadequate-Self, Hated-Self, and Reassured-Self) had an acceptable fit, two-tier models, with two general factors (Self-criticism and Self-reassurance) demonstrated the best fit across all samples. This study provides preliminary evidence suggesting that this two-factor structure can be used in a range of nonclinical contexts across countries and cultures. Inadequate-Self and Hated-Self might not by distinct factors in nonclinical samples. Future work may benefit from distinguishing between self-correction versus shame-based self-criticism.Peer reviewe
A Multilevel Multidimensional Finite Mixture Item Response Model to Cluster Respondents and Countries: The Forms of Self-Criticising/Attacking and Self-Reassuring Scale
The aim of this study was to test the multilevel multidimensional finite mixture item response model of the Forms of Self-Criticising/Attacking and Self-Reassuring Scale (FSCRS) to cluster respondents and countries from 13 samples (N = 7,714) and from 12 countries. The practical goal was to learn how many discrete classes there are on the level of individuals (i.e., how many cut-offs are to be used) and countries (i.e., the magnitude of similarities and dissimilarities among them). We employed the multilevel multidimensional finite mixture approach which is based on an extended class of multidimensional latent class Item Response Theory (IRT) models. Individuals and countries are partitioned into discrete latent classes with different levels of self-criticism and self-reassurance, taking into account at the same time the multidimensional structure of the construct. This approach was applied to the analysis of the relationships between observed characteristics and latent trait at different levels (individuals and countries), and across different dimensions using the three-dimensional measure of the FSCRS. Results showed that respondents' scores were dependent on unobserved (latent class) individual and country membership, the multidimensional structure of the instrument, and justified the use of a multilevel multidimensional finite mixture item response model in the comparative psychological assessment of individuals and countries. Latent class analysis of the FSCRS showed that individual participants and countries could be divided into discrete classes. Along with the previous findings that the FSCRS is psychometrically robust we can recommend using the FSCRS for measuring self-criticism
- …