91 research outputs found

    Late-time growth rate, mixing and anisotropy in the multimode narrowband Richtmyer--Meshkov Instability: the θ\theta-Group Collaboration

    Full text link
    Turbulent Richtmyer--Meshkov instability (RMI) is investigated through a series of high resolution three dimensional smulations of two initial conditions with eight independent codes. The simulations are initialised with a narrowband perturbation such that instability growth is due to non-linear coupling/backscatter from the energetic modes, thus generating the lowest expected growth rate from a pure RMI. By independently assessing the results from each algorithm, and computing ensemble averages of multiple algorithms, the results allow a quantification of key flow properties as well as the uncertainty due to differing numerical approaches. A new analytical model predicting the initial layer growth for a multimode narrowband perturbation is presented, along with two models for the linear and non-linear regime combined. Overall, the growth rate exponent is determined as θ=0.292±0.009\theta=0.292 \pm 0.009, in good agreement with prior studies; however, the exponent is decaying slowly in time. θ\theta is shown to be relatively insensitive to the choice of mixing layer width measurement. The asymptotic integral molecular mixing measures Θ=0.792±0.014\Theta=0.792\pm 0.014, Ξ=0.800±0.014\Xi=0.800 \pm 0.014 and Ψ=0.782±0.013\Psi=0.782\pm 0.013 which are lower than some experimental measurements but within the range of prior numerical studies. The flow field is shown to be persistently anisotropic for all algorithms, at the latest time having between 49\% and 66\% higher kinetic energy in the shock parallel direction compared to perpendicular and does not show any return to isotropy. The plane averaged volume fraction profiles at different time instants collapse reasonably well when scaled by the integral width, implying that the layer can be described by a single length scale and thus a single θ\theta. Quantitative data given for both ensemble averages and individual algorithms provide useful benchmark results for future research.Comment: 50 page

    A Comparative Analysis Shows Morphofunctional Differences between the Rat and Mouse Melanin-Concentrating Hormone Systems

    Get PDF
    Sub-populations of neurons producing melanin-concentrating hormone (MCH) are characterized by distinct projection patterns, birthdates and CART/NK3 expression in rat. Evidence for such sub-populations has not been reported in other species. However, given that genetically engineered mouse lines are now commonly used as experimental models, a better characterization of the anatomy and morphofunctionnal organization of MCH system in this species is then necessary. Combining multiple immunohistochemistry experiments with in situ hybridization, tract tracing or BrdU injections, evidence supporting the hypothesis that rat and mouse MCH systems are not identical was obtained: sub-populations of MCH neurons also exist in mouse, but their relative abundance is different. Furthermore, divergences in the distribution of MCH axons were observed, in particular in the ventromedial hypothalamus. These differences suggest that rat and mouse MCH neurons are differentially involved in anatomical networks that control feeding and the sleep/wake cycle

    MCH and feeding behavior-interaction with peptidic network

    Full text link

    MCH and feeding behavior-interaction with peptidic network.

    No full text
    International audienceNumerous works associate the MCH peptide, and the hypothalamic neurons that produce it, to the feeding behavior and energy homeostasis. It is commonly admitted that MCH is an orexigenic peptide, and MCH neurons could be under the control of arcuate NPY and POMC neurons. However, the literature data is not always concordant. In particular questions about the intrahypothalamic circuit involving other neuropeptides and about the mechanisms through which MCH could act are not yet clearly answered. For example, which receptors mediate a MCH response to NPY or alpha-MSH, does MCH act alone, is there any local anatomical organization within the tuberal LHA? A review of the current literature is then needed to help focus attention on these unresolved and often neglected issues
    corecore