Preface

AimThis was a one-year follow-up of families referred to support services after the parents visited the emergency department due to intimate partner violence, substance abuse or a suicide attempt. Its aim was to evaluate the well-being of any children. MethodsData on families identified a year earlier by the Amsterdam protocol were gathered from child protective services and parent and child self-reports in two Dutch regions from 2012-2015. ResultsWe included 399 children (52%) boys with a median age of eight years (range 1-18) in the study using child protective services data. Of the 101 families who participated in the first measurement, 67 responded one year after the parent's emergency department visit. The results showed that 20% of the children had no or minor problems, voluntary support services were involved in 60% of cases and child protective services were involved in 20%. Compared to their first assessment a year earlier, the children's psychosocial problems had not increased, but this could have been an underestimation due to selective responses. ConclusionThe Amsterdam protocol was valuable in referring families to voluntary support services, but given the ongoing problems in some families, professionals need to carefully monitor whether support services are sufficiently effectiv

Is there a difference between child self-ratings and parent proxy-ratings of the quality of life of children with a diagnosis of Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD)? A systematic review of the literature

There are contemporary indicators that parent proxy-ratings and child self-ratings of a child’s quality of life (QoL) are not interchangeable. This review examines dual informant studies to assess parent–child agreement on the QoL of children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. A systematic search of four major databases (PsycINFO, MEDLINE, EMBASE and Cochrane databases) was completed, and related peer-reviewed journals were hand-searched. Studies which reported quantitative QoL ratings for matched parent and child dyads were screened in accordance with relevant inclusion and exclusion criteria. Key findings were extracted from thirteen relevant studies, which were rated for conformity to the recommendations of an adapted version of the STROBE statement guidelines for observational studies. In the majority of studies reviewed, children rated their QoL more highly than their parents. There was some evidence for greater agreement on the physical health domain than psychosocial domains

Management of isolated fractures of the medial orbital wall

The purpose of the present study was to retrospectively review the management and outcome of patients treated by the Australian Craniofacial Unit (ACFU) for isolated fractures of the medial orbital wall. A retrospective medical record review of patients treated between 2008 and 2012 was performed. Ethical approval was granted by the ethics committee of the Women's and Children's Hospital. Patient demographics, causes of injury, physical examination findings, management (conservative or surgical), and findings at follow-up were recorded. Computed tomographic scans were reviewed, and values for fracture area and volume of displaced tissue were calculated. Twenty-four patients with this injury were treated by the ACFU between 2008 and 2012. Eighteen were male, and 6 were female. Assault was the most common cause (15/24 patients). Fifteen patients were managed conservatively, and 9 were treated surgically. In those patients managed conservatively, the mean fracture area was 1.44 cm (0.47-2.47 cm), and the mean volume of displaced tissue was 0.48 mL (0.03-1.15 mL). In patients treated surgically, the mean fracture surface area was 2.32 cm (0.07-3.43 cm), and mean volume of displaced tissue was 0.94 mL (0.00-1.47 mL). No patients were found to have clinically significant enophthalmos at follow-up examination. The current practice of managing isolated fractures of the medial orbital wall at the ACFU has been successful in preventing significant enophthalmos. The thresholds for fracture area and, in particular, volume of displaced tissue, proposed by Jin et al (J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2000;58:617-620), show merit as a tool for determining patient management.Broughton J. Snell, Walter Flapper, Mark Moore, Peter Anderson and David J. Davi