Photopharmacologic Vision Restoration Reduces Pathological Rhythmic Field Potentials in Blind Mouse Retina

Photopharmacology has yielded compounds that have potential to restore impaired visual responses resulting from outer retinal degeneration diseases such as retinitis pigmentosa. Here we evaluate two photoswitchable azobenzene ion channel blockers, DAQ and DAA for vision restoration. DAQ exerts its effect primarily on RGCs, whereas DAA induces light-dependent spiking primarily through amacrine cell activation. Degeneration-induced local field potentials remain a major challenge common to all vision restoration approaches. These 5-10 Hz rhythmic potentials increase the background firing rate of retinal ganglion cells (RGCs) and overlay the stimulated response, thereby reducing signal-to-noise ratio. Along with the bipolar cell-selective photoswitch DAD and second-generation RGC-targeting photoswitch PhENAQ, we investigated the effects of DAA and DAQ on rhythmic local field potentials (LFPs) occurring in the degenerating retina. We found that photoswitches targeting neurons upstream of RGCs, DAA (amacrine cells) and DAD (bipolar cells) suppress the frequency of LFPs, while DAQ and PhENAQ (RGCs) had negligible effects on frequency or spectral power of LFPs. Taken together, these results demonstrate remarkable diversity of cell-type specificity of photoswitchable channel blockers in the retina and suggest that specific compounds may counter rhythmic LFPs to produce superior signal-to-noise characteristics in vision restoration

Effectiveness of Compounded Bioidentical Hormone Replacement Therapy: An Observational Cohort Study

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Bioidentical Hormone Replacement Therapy (BHRT) is believed it to be a safer and equally effective alternative to Conventional Hormone Therapy for the relief of menopausal symptoms; however, data are needed to support these claims. The objective of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of compounded BHRT provided in six community pharmacies.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>This was an observational cohort study of women between the ages of 18-89 who received a compounded BHRT product from January 1, 2003 to April 30, 2010 in six community pharmacies. Data included patient demographics, comorbidities, therapeutic outcomes, and hormone therapies. Women self-rated menopausal symptoms as absent, mild, moderate, or severe. Descriptive statistics were used to characterize the patient population, BHRT use, and adverse events. Patient symptom severity was compared at baseline and 3 to 6 months follow-up using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>Women (n = 296) receiving BHRT at Oakdell Pharmacy had a mean (standard deviation) age of 52 (9) years. The most common BHRT dosage forms utilized were topical (71%) and oral (43%). Compounded BHRT regimens were generally initiated at low doses regardless of route. Women experienced a 25% decrease in emotional lability (p < 0.01), a 25% decrease in irritability (p < 0.01), and a 22% reduction in anxiety (p = 0.01) within 3 to 6 months. These women also experienced a 14% reduction in night sweats (p = 0.09) and a 6% reduction in hot flashes (p = 0.50).</p> <p>Conclusions</p> <p>This study demonstrates that compounded BHRT improves mood symptoms. Larger studies are needed to examine the impact on vasomotor symptoms, myocardial infarction and breast cancer.</p

Lessons learned by giving amphetamine to antipsychotic-medicated schizophrenia patients

Experimental Medicine studies in psychiatric populations test specific, mechanistic hypotheses related to the biology of mental illness, by combining well-characterized neurobiological probes and laboratory-based measures of behavioral performance and neurobiology. However, scientific inquiry through the acute administration of psychoactive drugs to patients with serious mental illness raises important ethical issues. These issues arise in studies in which the psychostimulant, amphetamine, is used as an Experimental Medicine probe in patients with schizophrenia. In this study, we summarize relevant aspects of our experience with acute, laboratory-based challenges of amphetamine in schizophrenia patients. Schizophrenia patients participated in one or more Experimental Medicine studies involving limited doses of amphetamine with clinical monitoring, over a 4-year period. Acute (within hours of ingestion; collective n = 53), subacute (three active doses over 4 weeks; n = 28), and long-term (mean = 17 months after ingestion; n = 19) effects of amphetamine ingestion were assessed. In antipsychotic (AP)-medicated schizophrenia patients, amphetamine was associated with no detrimental subjective, autonomic, or functional changes. Symptoms assessed acutely, subacutely, or long term were either unchanged or diminished. No adverse acute, subacute, or long-term consequences from the Experimental Medicine use of amphetamine in antipsychotic-medicated schizophrenia patients were detected. These findings do not address the safety or effectiveness of the use of amphetamine in unmedicated patients, or as an adjunctive treatment for schizophrenia. Indeed, it is important to distinguish evidence-based risks of symptom exacerbation in an Experimental Medicine setting vs. risks associated with long-term, daily clinical use or even misuse of amphetamine