24 research outputs found
Decision aid prototype development for parents considering adenotonsillectomy for their children with sleep disordered breathing
Utility of an image-based technique to detect changes in joint congruency following simulated joint injury and repair: An in vitro study of the elbow
PMS7 TREATMENT OF DISPLACED FEMORAL NECK FRACTURES IN THE ELDERLYA COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS
Cemented humeral stem<i>versus</i>press-fit humeral stem in total shoulder arthroplasty
AimsThe aim of this study was to evaluate the differences in revision and complication rates, functional outcomes, and radiological outcomes between cemented and press-fit humeral stems in primary anatomical total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA).Materials and MethodsA comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted searching for studies that included patients who underwent primary anatomical TSA for primary osteoarthritis or rheumatoid arthritis.ResultsThere was a total of 36 studies with 927 cemented humeral stems and 1555 press-fit stems. The revision rate was 5.4% (95% confidence interval (CI) 3.9 to 7.4) at a mean of 89 months for cemented stems, and 2.4% (95% CI 1.1 to 4.7) at a mean of 40 months for press-fit stems. A priori subgroup analysis to control for follow-up periods demonstrated similar revision rates: 2.3% (95% CI 1.1 to 4.7) for cemented stems versus 1.8% (95% CI 1.4 to 2.9) for press-fit stems. Exploratory meta-regression found that longer follow-up was a moderating variable for revision (p = 0.003).ConclusionCement fixation had similar revision rates when compared to press-fit stems at short- to midterm follow-up. Rotator cuff pathology was a prevalent complication in both groups but is likely not related to fixation type. Overall, with comparable revision rates, possible easier revision, and decreased operative time, humeral press-fit fixation may be an optimal choice for primary anatomical TSA in patients with sufficient bone stock. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2019;101-B:1107–1114.</jats:sec
The Effect of a Coronoid Prosthesis on Restoring Stability to the Coronoid-Deficient Elbow: A Biomechanical Study
A biomechanical assessment of fixation methods for a coronoid prosthesis
© 2015 Elsevier Ltd. Background The coronoid process is an integral component for maintaining elbow joint stability. When fixation of a fracture is not possible, prosthetic replacement may be a feasible solution for restoring stability. The purpose of this in-vitro biomechanical study was to compare fixation methods for a coronoid implant. Methods A coronoid prosthesis was subjected to distally-directed tip loading after implantation using four fixation methods: press-fit, anterior-to-posterior screws, posterior-to-anterior screws, and cement. Testing was performed on seven fresh-frozen ulnae in a repeated-measures model. Rounds of cyclic loading were applied at 1 Hz, for 100 cycles, increased in 50 N increments up to a maximum of 400 N. Micro-motion of the implant was quantified using an optical-tracking system. Outcome variables included total displacement, distal translation, gapping, anterior translation and axial stem rotation. Findings Cement fixation reduced implant micro-motion compared to screw fixation, while the greatest implant micro-motion was observed in press-fit fixation. Comparing screw-fixation techniques, posterior-anterior screws provided superior stability only in distal translation. The implant did not experience displacements exceeding 0.9 mm with screw or cement fixation. Interpretation Cement fixation provides the best initial fixation for a coronoid implant. However, the stability provided by both methods of screw fixation may be sufficient to allow osseous integration to be achieved for long-term fixation. Large displacements were observed using the press-fit fixation technique, suggesting that modifications would need to be developed and tested before this technique could be recommended for clinical application
A new childhood ALL case with an extremely complex karyotype and acute spontaneous tumor lysis syndrome
Abstract
Background
B cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL) is the most common malignancy of childhood, with, after corresponding treatment, an overall complete remission rate of 90%. Approximately 75% of B-ALL cases harbor recurrent abnormalities, including so-called complex karyotypes (CK). Tumor lysis syndrome (TLS) is a metabolic abnormality which may arise during cancer therapy and also, extremely rarely, as spontaneous TLS before initiation of chemotherapy in patients with ALL.
Case presentation
Here we report a 9-year-old male, diagnosed with a de novo pre-B-ALL according to the WHO classification. Cytogenetic, molecular cytogenetic approaches and array comparative genomic hybridization analyses revealed a unique CK involving five chromosomes. It included four yet unreported chromosomal aberrations: a der(11)t(7;11)(p22.1;q24.2), a der(18)t(7;18)(q21.3;p11.22), del(11)(q24.2q25) and dup(18)(q11.1q23). Unfortunately, the patient died 3 months after the initial diagnosis.
Conclusions
To the best of our knowledge, a comparable childhood ALL case was not previously reported. Thus, the combination of the here seen chromosomal aberrations in childhood primary ALL seems to indicate for an extremely adverse prognosis.
</jats:sec
A new childhood ALL case with an extremely complex karyotype and acute spontaneous tumor lysis syndrome
Background: B cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL) is the most common malignancy of childhood,
with, after corresponding treatment, an overall complete remission rate of 90%. Approximately 75% of B-ALL cases
harbor recurrent abnormalities, including so-called complex karyotypes (CK). Tumor lysis syndrome (TLS) is a metabolic
abnormality which may arise during cancer therapy and also, extremely rarely, as spontaneous TLS before initiation
of chemotherapy in patients with ALL.
Case presentation: Here we report a 9-year-old male, diagnosed with a de novo pre-B-ALL according to the WHO
classification. Cytogenetic, molecular cytogenetic approaches and array comparative genomic hybridization analyses
revealed a unique CK involving five chromosomes. It included four yet unreported chromosomal aberrations: a
der(11)t(7;11)(p22.1;q24.2), a der(18)t(7;18)(q21.3;p11.22), del(11)(q24.2q25) and dup(18)(q11.1q23). Unfortunately, the
patient died 3 months after the initial diagnosis.
Conclusions: To the best of our knowledge, a comparable childhood ALL case was not previously reported. Thus, the
combination of the here seen chromosomal aberrations in childhood primary ALL seems to indicate for an extremely
adverse prognosis
