The impact of irritable bowel syndrome on health-related quality of life in women with polycystic ovary syndrome

Background: The objectives of this study were to compare the prevalence and quality of life (QOL) of irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) in women with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) compared with healthy women. Methods: This was a case-control study of 201 women recruited at an infertility clinic in Iran. The control group were healthy women (n = 100) and the comparison group, women with PCOS (n = 101). Data were collected by clinical Rome III criteria to determine the IBS, Bristol scale for stool consistency and IBS QOL. Results: The reporting of IBS symptoms were higher in PCOS (20.7%) than control group (11%) (P = 0.05). The IBS QOL score in the IBS + PCOS group was lower than other groups (IBS+ non PCOS, non IBS + PCOS, non IBS+ non PCOS; scores in food avoidance and worries about health domains were significant (P < 0.01). Conclusions: We conclude that having PCOS and an increased level of LH/FSH tends to cause IBS symptoms. IBS + PCOS women experience significant impaired quality of life scores particularly in relation to worries about health and food avoidance. These results offer further insights into IBS in PCOS women and their functional status and wellbeing

Granulocyte colony stimulating factor (GCSF) did not affect the fertility outcomes in women with unexplained infertility after intrauterine insemination: a randomised clinical trial

This study aimed to evaluate the effect of granulocyte colony stimulating factor (GCSF) on fertility outcomes in women with unexplained infertility after intrauterine insemination (IUI). This study is a randomised clinical trial that was conducted on unexplained infertile women referred to infertility Clinic in Yasuj, Iran. All participants were stimulated by letrozole, clomiphene and HMG during the cycle. When at least one follicle was greater than 18 mm, 5000 IU hCG intramuscularly was administered for ovulation induction and then IUI was performed 34–36 hours later. In GCSF group, 300 μg GCSF subcutaneously administrated in two days after IUI. Control group received routine IUI. The main outcome measures were biochemical pregnancy, clinical pregnancy, abortion and ongoing pregnancy rate. Our results showed no statistically significant difference in the biochemical pregnancy (16.3% vs. 12.2%; P=.56), clinical pregnancy (16.3% vs. 8.2%; P=.21), abortion (0 vs. 2.04%; P=.55) and ongoing pregnancy rates (8.2% vs. 14.2%; P=.32) between the control and the G-CSF groups. The results of the current study suggest that systemic administration of 300 μg GCSF in the two days after receiving IUI in patients with unexplained infertility does not offer any beneficial clinical related implantation, and pregnancy rates. IRCT registration number: IRCT20160524028038N4 Impact statement What is already known on this subject? Unexplained infertility means to the inability of couples in pregnancy after a year without obvious male and female infertility factors. Some patients have not been justified in endometrial function, which leads to the defect of the dialogue between the foetus and endometrium and may lead to implantation failure. Granulocyte colony stimulating factor is produced at the maternal-foetal interface during embryo implantation and is the main part of the uterine-cytokine network that is needed to create and maintain pregnancy. What do the results of this study add? The current study suggests that systemic administration of 300 μg granulocyte colony stimulating factor in the two days after receiving IUI in patients with unexplained infertility does not offer any beneficial clinical related implantation and pregnancy rates. What are the implications of these findings for clinical practice and/or further research? These results may not be generalised to all patients and more randomised controlled trials are needed for the comparison of granulocyte colony stimulating factor effects on women with thin and normal endometrial thickness, efficacy, side effects, and pregnancy outcomes of the intrauterine perfusion versus systemic subcutaneous administration of granulocyte colony stimulating factor in unexplained infertility treated with intrauterine insemination

Factors predicting age at menopause among Iranian women in the Bandare-Kong cohort study (a cross-sectional survey of PERSIAN cohort study)

Abstract Background Menopause is a natural period in women’s life and can be affected by several factors. The aim of this study was to identify the associated factors for age of natural menopause and among women with early and premature menopause based on a cohort study in Iran. Methods This population-based study was conducted on 894 post menopause women between 35 and 70 years old who participated in the Bandare-Kong Non-Communicable Diseases (BKNCD) Cohort Study, a part of Prospective Epidemiological Research Studies in Iran (PERSIAN) from March 2016 to February 2019. All women completed a standard self-reported questionnaire. Data were analyzed using chi-square test, independent t test, and ANOVA as well as a multivariable linear regression model. Results The mean age at natural menopause was 48.31 ± 6.34 years. After adjusting other variables, gravida, history of cardiac disease, socioeconomic status and residence status were predictive of age at menopause (P < 0.001). Among the premature menopause group, the mean age at menopause was significantly higher among women with diabetes compared to women without diabetes group (35.68 ± 2.92 vs. 33.82 ± 3.06; P = 0.043), while the mean age at menopause was significantly lower in women with infertility compared to women without infertility (29.13 ± 5.22 vs. 34.84 ± 2.826; P = 0.048). Conclusions This study suggests that the predictors of menopausal age differed in women with premature menopause compared to overall menopause age. Prospective studies are needed to evaluation the effects of these factors on menopausal age

Obstetric, maternal, and neonatal outcomes in COVID-19 compared to healthy pregnant women in Iran: a retrospective, case-control study

Abstract Background The purpose of the present study was to evaluate obstetric, maternal, and neonatal outcomes in COVID-19 compared to healthy pregnant women in Iran. Results A case-control study was conducted on 55 COVID-19 as the case and 55 matched control pregnant women in Hormozgan, Iran. Patients were considered to be cases if they had a positive COVID-19 test plus a positive chest X-ray result. Our measures were COVID-19 symptoms, including laboratory evaluations, clinical symptoms, and maternal and neonatal outcomes. The most prevalent symptoms related to COVID-19 were fever (69.09%) and cough (58.18%). Less common symptoms included fatigue, diarrhea, shortness of breath, sore throat, and myalgia. Hydroxychloroquine/chloroquine (58.18%) and antibiotic therapy (45.45%) were the most prevalent management in COVID-19 patients. Based on our findings, maternal and obstetric outcomes—neonatal in case groups—such as mode of delivery, premature rupture of membrane, postpartum hemorrhage, perineal resection rate, neonates’ birth weight, Apgar score, and neonatal asphyxia rate were similar to pregnant women without COVID-19. We observed a higher incidence rate of premature delivery in COVID-19 cases (25 vs. 10%) (p < 0.05). In the present study, we found that women with COVID-19 had a more than twofold increased odds of preterm labor. History of preterm delivery was also associated with high twofold odds of preterm labor. Conclusion We observed a higher incidence rate of premature delivery in COVID-19 cases. Women with COVID-19 had a more than twofold increased odds of preterm labor. Considering prematurity has high morbidity and is regarded as the primary cause of mortality in children under 5 years old, more case-control studies are needed to ascertain the results