The accuracy of coronary CT angiography in patients with coronary calcium score above 1000 Agatston Units:Comparison with quantitative coronary angiography: Coronary CT Angiography in High Coronary Calcium

BACKGROUND: High amounts of coronary artery calcium (CAC) pose challenges in interpretation of coronary CT angiography (CCTA). The accuracy of stenosis assessment by CCTA in patients with very extensive CAC is uncertain. METHODS: Retrospective study was performed including patients who underwent clinically directed CCTA with CAC score >1000 and invasive coronary angiography within 90 days. Segmental stenosis on CCTA was graded by visual inspection with two-observer consensus using categories of 0%, 1–24%, 25–49%, 50–69%, 70–99%, 100% stenosis, or uninterpretable. Blinded quantitative coronary angiography (QCA) was performed on all segments with stenosis ≥25% by CCTA. The primary outcome was vessel-based agreement between CCTA and QCA, using significant stenosis defined by diameter stenosis ≥ 70%. Secondary analyses on a per-patient basis and inclusive of uninterpretable segments were performed. RESULTS: 726 segments with stenosis ≥25% in 346 vessels within 119 patients were analyzed. Median coronary calcium score was 1616 (1221–2118). CCTA identification of QCA-based stenosis resulted in a per-vessel sensitivity of 79%, specificity of 75%, positive predictive value (PPV) of 45%, negative predictive value (NPV) of 93%, and accuracy 76% (68 false positive and 15 false negative). Per-patient analysis had sensitivity 94%, specificity 55%, PPV 63%, NPV 92%, and accuracy 72% (30 false-positive and 3 false-negative). Inclusion of uninterpretable segments had variable effect on sensitivity and specificity, depending on whether they are considered as significant or non-significant stenosis. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with very extensive CAC (>1000 Agatston units), CCTA retained a negative predictive value > 90% to identify lack of significant stenosis on a per-vessel and per-patient level, but frequently overestimated stenosis

Safety of Coronary Reactivity Testing in Women With No Obstructive Coronary Artery Disease Results From the NHLBI-Sponsored WISE (Women's Ischemia Syndrome Evaluation) Study

ObjectivesThis study evaluated the safety of coronary reactivity testing (CRT) in symptomatic women with evidence of myocardial ischemia and no obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD).BackgroundMicrovascular coronary dysfunction (MCD) in women with no obstructive CAD portends an adverse prognosis of a 2.5% annual major adverse cardiovascular event (MACE) rate. The diagnosis of MCD is established by invasive CRT, yet the risk of CRT is unknown.MethodsThe authors evaluated 293 symptomatic women with ischemia and no obstructive CAD, who underwent CRT at 3 experienced centers. Microvascular function was assessed using a Doppler wire and injections of adenosine, acetylcholine, and nitroglycerin into the left coronary artery. CRT-related serious adverse events (SAEs), adverse events (AEs), and follow-up MACE (death, nonfatal myocardial infarction [MI], nonfatal stroke, or hospitalization for heart failure) were recorded.ResultsCRT-SAEs occurred in 2 women (0.7%) during the procedure: 1 had coronary artery dissection, and 1 developed MI associated with coronary spasm. CRT-AEs occurred in 2 women (0.7%) and included 1 transient air microembolism and 1 deep venous thrombosis. There was no CRT-related mortality. In the mean follow-up period of 5.4 years, the MACE rate was 8.2%, including 5 deaths (1.7%), 8 nonfatal MIs (2.7%), 8 nonfatal strokes (2.7%), and 11 hospitalizations for heart failure (3.8%).ConclusionsIn women undergoing CRT for suspected MCD, contemporary testing carries a relatively low risk compared with the MACE rate in these women. These results support the use of CRT by experienced operators for establishing definitive diagnosis and assessing prognosis in this at-risk population. (Women's Ischemia Syndrome Evaluation [WISE]; NCT00832702

Does Patent Foramen Ovale Promote Cryptogenic Stroke and Migraine Headache?

Cryptogenic stroke is a diagnosis of exclusion. These are strokes that occur in people who are usually less than 55 years old, without an identifiable cause. Our sensitivity to these events has been heightened because of the new definitions of a transient ischemic attack. Transient ischemic attack (TIA) is a clinical diagnosis of a neurologic deficit without MRI abnormalities: if there is an MRI abnormality, whether or not that person is symptomatic, it is now defined as a stroke. With these new definitions, and the sensitivity of MRI, we are seeing more cryptogenic strokes. It has been hypothesized that many cryptogenic strokes are caused by small emboli that travel from the legs to the right atrium; during straining (such as a Valsalva maneuver) these emboli can go across a PFO into the left atrium and then travel to the brain, producing a stroke. The problem is that these are very small emboli, approximately 1 to 3 mm, and we can't actually show these small emboli crossing from right to left. However, large emboli have been observed by echocardiography to be trapped in the PFO. So the diagnosis of cryptogenic stroke is a diagnosis of exclusion that is impossible to verify. What is the scope of the problem? Of the 700,000 strokes per year in the United States, 80% of them are ischemic, and 20% of those are defined as cryptogenic. The prevalence of PFO among this cryptogenic stroke population is about 40% to 50%; in the general population, it's only about 20%. Current estimates are that somewhere between 30,000 and 60,000 strokes per year in the U.S. are caused by paradoxical embolism through a PFO. There are some other fascinating associations: scuba divers with PFOs are more susceptible to decompression illness. Platypnea-orthodeoxia is a condition of desaturation that occurs when you're standing up but not when you're lying down; these patients are quite symptomatic, with arterial saturations in the low 80s. They also frequently have PFOs; if you close the PFO, the arterial desaturation is alleviated. Fat emboli during orthopedic surgery or air emboli during neurosurgery may also travel through the venous system. If you don't have a PFO, the fat or the air is trapped in the lungs and doesn't cause much of a problem unless it's massive; but if you have a PFO, then the embolus can go from right to left atrium up to the brain, with devastating neurologic consequences

Assessment of intermediate severity coronary lesions in the catheterization laboratory.

The management of intermediate coronary lesions, defined by a diameter stenosis of 40% to 70%, continues to be a therapeutic dilemma for cardiologists. The 2-dimensional representation of the arterial lesion provided by angiography is limited in distinguishing intermediate lesions that require stenting from those that simply need appropriate medical therapy. In the era of drug-eluting stents, some might propose that stenting all intermediate coronary lesions is an appropriate solution. However, the possibility of procedural complications such as coronary dissection, no reflow phenomenon, in-stent restenosis, and stent thrombosis requires accurate stratification of patients with intermediate coronary lesions to appropriate therapy. Intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) and fractional flow reserve index (FFR) provide anatomic and functional information that can be used in the catheterization laboratory to designate patients to the most appropriate therapy. The purpose of this review is to discuss the critical information obtained from IVUS and FFR in guiding treatment of patients with intermediate coronary lesions. In addition, the importance of IVUS and FFR in the management of patients with serial stenosis, bifurcation lesions, left main disease, saphenous vein graft disease, and acute coronary syndrome will be discussed