The positional-specificity effect reveals a passive-trace contribution to visual short-term memory.

The positional-specificity effect refers to enhanced performance in visual short-term memory (VSTM) when the recognition probe is presented at the same location as had been the sample, even though location is irrelevant to the match/nonmatch decision. We investigated the mechanisms underlying this effect with behavioral and fMRI studies of object change-detection performance. To test whether the positional-specificity effect is a direct consequence of active storage in VSTM, we varied memory load, reasoning that it should be observed for all objects presented in a sub-span array of items. The results, however, indicated that although robust with a memory load of 1, the positional-specificity effect was restricted to the second of two sequentially presented sample stimuli in a load-of-2 experiment. An additional behavioral experiment showed that this disruption wasn't due to the increased load per se, because actively processing a second object--in the absence of a storage requirement--also eliminated the effect. These behavioral findings suggest that, during tests of object memory, position-related information is not actively stored in VSTM, but may be retained in a passive tag that marks the most recent site of selection. The fMRI data were consistent with this interpretation, failing to find location-specific bias in sustained delay-period activity, but revealing an enhanced response to recognition probes that matched the location of that trial's sample stimulus

Neural Bases of Human Working Memory

Peer Reviewedhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/72435/1/1467-8721.00058.pd

Encoded and updated spatial working memories share a common representational format in alpha activity

Working memory (WM) flexibly updates information to adapt to the dynamic environment. Here, we used alpha-band activity in the EEG to reconstruct the content of dynamic WM updates and compared this representational format to static WM content. An inverted encoding model using alpha activity precisely tracked both the initially encoded position and the updated position following an auditory cue signaling mental updating. The timing of the update, as tracked in the EEG, correlated with reaction times and saccade latency. Finally, cross-training analyses revealed a robust generalization of alpha-band reconstruction of WM contents before and after updating. These findings demonstrate that alpha activity tracks the dynamic updates to spatial WM and that the format of this activity is preserved across the encoded and updated representations. Thus, our results highlight a new approach for measuring updates to WM and show common representational formats during dynamic mental updating and static storage

The Effects of Two Types of Sleep Deprivation on Visual Working Memory Capacity and Filtering Efficiency

Sleep deprivation has adverse consequences for a variety of cognitive functions. The exact effects of sleep deprivation, though, are dependent upon the cognitive process examined. Within working memory, for example, some component processes are more vulnerable to sleep deprivation than others. Additionally, the differential impacts on cognition of different types of sleep deprivation have not been well studied. The aim of this study was to examine the effects of one night of total sleep deprivation and 4 nights of partial sleep deprivation (4 hours in bed/night) on two components of visual working memory: capacity and filtering efficiency. Forty-four healthy young adults were randomly assigned to one of the two sleep deprivation conditions. All participants were studied: 1) in a well-rested condition (following 6 nights of 9 hours in bed/night); and 2) following sleep deprivation, in a counter-balanced order. Visual working memory testing consisted of two related tasks. The first measured visual working memory capacity and the second measured the ability to ignore distractor stimuli in a visual scene (filtering efficiency). Results showed neither type of sleep deprivation reduced visual working memory capacity. Partial sleep deprivation also generally did not change filtering efficiency. Total sleep deprivation, on the other hand, did impair performance in the filtering task. These results suggest components of visual working memory are differentially vulnerable to the effects of sleep deprivation, and different types of sleep deprivation impact visual working memory to different degrees. Such findings have implications for operational settings where individuals may need to perform with inadequate sleep and whose jobs involve receiving an array of visual information and discriminating the relevant from the irrelevant prior to making decisions or taking actions (e.g., baggage screeners, air traffic controllers, military personnel, health care providers)

Attention-based rehearsal in spatial working memory.

Spatial working memory has previously been dissociated from other working memory systems, but there has been relatively little research on the specific subcomponents of spatial working memory. I propose a specific model of spatial working memory in which covert shifts of spatial selective attention mediate the on-line maintenance of location-specific representations. Three forms of evidence support this model: (1) A review of the literature shows that there is significant correspondence in the neuroanatomical circuits that mediate spatial selective attention and spatial working memory. A variety of evidence converges on the conclusion that a highly-interactive frontal-parietal network plays a key role in both processes. In addition, there is evidence that when subjects selectively attend to a location, enhanced activation is observed in the extrastriate and striate cortex (regions known to mediate early processing of visual information); and this finding is paralleled by the consistent activation of these regions during neuroimaging studies of spatial working memory. (2) Behavioral studies have shown that observers make faster and more accurate responses to stimuli that fall in attended rather than unattended locations. The same enhanced visual processing can also be demonstrated at memorized versus nonmemorized locations (Experiment 1). These reaction time patterns are not attributable to stimulus-driven shifts of attention, or strategic orienting on the part of subjects (Experiment 2). Moreover, Experiment 3 provides converging evidence for these attentional effects by demonstrating that subjects are impaired in their ability to discriminate colors at non-memorized locations. (3) Finally, Experiment 3 shows that when subjects are hindered in their ability to direct selective attention to memorized locations, their ability to accurately remember spatial information is impaired. This result suggests that the observed shifts of spatial selective attention play a direct functional role in the on-line maintenance of spatial information.Ph.D.Cognitive psychologyPsychobiologyPsychologyUniversity of Michigan, Horace H. Rackham School of Graduate Studieshttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/129837/2/9635483.pd

Evidence for split attentional foci

A partial report procedure was used to test the ability of observers to split attention over noncontiguous locations. Observers reported the identity of 2 targets that appeared within a 5 × 5 stimulus array, and cues (validity = 80%) informed them of the 2 most likely target locations. On invalid trials, 1 of the targets appeared directly in between the cued locations. Experiments 1, la, and 2 showed a strong accuracy advantage at cued locations compared with intervening ones. This effect was larger when the cues were arranged horizontally rather than vertically. Experiment 3 suggests that this effect of cue orientation reflects an advantage for processing targets that appear in different hemifields. Experiments 4 and 4a suggest that the primary mechanism supporting the flexible deployment of spatial attention is the suppression of interference from stimuli at unattended locations. There is a substantial body of research showing that when observers direct attention to specific parts of the visual field, information processing is facilitated at attended locations relative to unattended locations. A basic question is how flexibly attention can be deployed over space. Most models of spatial attention have assumed that attention is allocated over contiguous regions of space (e.g., Eriksen & Yeh, 1985