The SIMS trial:adjustable anchored single-incision mini-slings versus standard tension-free midurethral slings in the surgical management of female stress urinary incontinence. A study protocol for a pragmatic, multicentre, non-inferiority randomised controlled trial

This is a UK Collaborative Study funded by the NIHR Evaluation, Health Technology Assessment (HTA) Programme — Funder Number 12/127/157.Peer reviewedPublisher PD

Persistent urinary incontinence and delivery mode history: a six-year longitudinal study.

Objective: To investigate the prevalence of persistent and long term postpartum urinary incontinence and associations with mode of first and subsequent delivery. Setting: Maternity units in Aberdeen (Scotland), Birmingham (England) and Dunedin (New Zealand). Design: Longitudinal study Population: 4214 women who returned postal questionnaires 3 months and 6 years after the index birth. Methods: Symptom data were obtained from both questionnaires and obstetric data from case-notes for the index birth and the second questionnaire for subsequent births. Logistic regression investigated the independent effects of mode of first delivery and delivery mode history. Main outcome measures: Urinary incontinence – persistent (at 3 months and 6 years after index birth) and long-term (at 6 years after index birth). Results: The prevalence of persistent urinary incontinence was 24%. Delivering exclusively by Caesarean section was associated with both less persistent (OR= 0.46, 95% CI 0.32 to 0.68) and long term urinary incontinence (OR=0.50, 95% CI 0.40 to 0.63). Caesarean section birth in addition to vaginal delivery however was not associated with significantly less persistent incontinence (OR 0.93, 95%CI 0.67 to 1.29). There were no significant associations between persistent or long-term urinary incontinence and forceps or vacuum extraction delivery. Other significantly associated factors were increasing number of births and older maternal age. Conclusions: The risk of persistent and long term urinary incontinence is significantly lower following Caesarean section deliveries but not if there is another vaginal birth. Even when delivering exclusively by Caesarean section, the prevalence of persistent symptoms (14%) is still high

Management of obstetric anal sphincter injury: a systematic review & national practice survey

BACKGROUND: We aim to establish the evidence base for the recognition and management of obstetric anal sphincter injury (OASI) and to compare this with current practice amongst UK obstetricians and coloproctologists. METHODS: A systematic review of the literature and a postal questionnaire survey of consultant obstetricians, trainee obstetricians and consultant coloproctologists was carried out. RESULTS: We found a wide variation in experience of repairing acute anal sphincter injury. The group with largest experience were consultant obstetricians (46.5% undertaking ≥ 5 repairs/year), whilst only 10% of responding colorectal surgeons had similar levels of experience (p < 0.001). There was extensive misunderstanding in terms of the definition of obstetric anal sphincter injuries. Overall, trainees had a greater knowledge of the correct classification (p < 0.01). Observational studies suggest that a new 'overlap' repair using PDS sutures with antibiotic cover gives better functional results. However, our literature search found only one randomised controlled trial (RCT) on the technique of repair of OASI, which showed no difference in incidence of anal incontinence at three months. Despite this, there was a wide variation in practice, with 337(50%) consultants, 82 (55%) trainees and 80 (89%) coloproctologists already using the 'overlap' method for repair of a torn EAS (p < 0.001). Although over 50% of colorectal surgeons would undertake long-term follow-up of their patients, this was the practice of less than 10% of obstetricians (p < 0.001). Whilst over 70% of coloproctologists would recommend an elective caesarean section in a subsequent pregnancy, only 22% of obstetric consultants and 14% of trainees (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: An agreed classification of OASI, development of national guidelines, formalised training, multidisciplinary management and further definitive research is strongly recommended

A multiple shooting descent-based filter method for optimal control problems

A direct multiple shooting (MS) method is implemented to solve optimal control problems (OCP) in the Mayer form. The use of an MS method gives rise to the so-called ‘continuity conditions’ that must be satisfied together with general algebraic equality and inequality constraints. The resulting finite nonlinear optimization problem is solved by a first-order descent method based on the filter methodology. In the equivalent tri-objective problem, the descent method aims to minimize the objective function, the violation of the ‘continuity conditions’ and the violation of the algebraic constraints simultaneously. The numerical experiments carried out with different types of benchmark OCP are encouraging.We acknowledge the financial support of CIDEM, R&D unit funded by the FCT - Portuguese Foundation for the Development of Science and Technology, Ministry of Science, Technology and Higher Education, under the Project UID/EMS/0615/2019, and FCT within the Projects Scope: UID/CEC/00319/2019 and UID/MAT/00013/2013

Clinical and cost-effectiveness of a new nurse-led continence service: a randomised controlled trial

BACKGROUND: Continence services in the UK have developed at different rates within differing care models, resulting in scattered and inconsistent services. Consequently, questions remain about the most cost-effective method of delivering these services. AIM: To evaluate the impact of a new service led by a continence nurse practitioner compared with existing primary/secondary care provision for people with urinary incontinence and storage symptoms. DESIGN OF STUDY: Randomised controlled trial with a 3- and 6-month follow-up in men and women (n = 3746) aged 40 years and over living in private households (intervention [n = 2958]; control [n = 788]). SETTING: Leicestershire and Rutland, UK. METHOD: The continence nurse practitioner intervention comprised a continence service provided by specially trained nurses delivering evidence-based interventions using pre-determined care pathways. They delivered an 8-week primary intervention package that included advice on diet and fluids; bladder training; pelvic floor awareness and lifestyle advice. The standard care arm comprised access to existing primary care including GP and continence advisory services in the area. Outcome measures were recorded at 3 and 6 months post-randomisation. RESULTS: The percentage of individuals who improved (with at least one symptom alleviated) at 3 months was 59% in the intervention group compared with 48% in the standard care group (difference of 11%, 95% CI = 7 to 16; P<0.001) The percentage of people reporting no symptoms or ‘cured’ was 25% in the intervention group and 15% in the standard care group (difference of 10%, 95% CI = 6 to 13, P = 0.001). At 6 months the difference was maintained. There was a significant difference in impact scores between the two groups at 3 and 6 months. CONCLUSIONS: The continence nurse practitioner-led intervention reduced the symptoms of incontinence, frequency, urgency and nocturia at 3 and 6 months; impact was reduced; and satisfaction with the new service was high