Keynote Address: Can a Sign or Occult Finding Predict a Causal Relationship?: How to Reason About Possible Child Abuse

Keynote Address for the University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform Symposium, Child Abuse Evidence: New Perspectives from Law, Medicine, Psychology & Statistics

Keynote Address: Can a Sign or Occult Finding Predict a Causal Relationship?: How to Reason About Possible Child Abuse

Keynote Address for the University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform Symposium, Child Abuse Evidence: New Perspectives from Law, Medicine, Psychology & Statistics

Adjunctive diagnostic value of targeted electrical impedance imaging to conventional methods in the evaluation of breast lesions

PURPOSE: To determine the diagnostic accuracy of targeted electrical impedance imaging in characterizing breast lesions, and to evaluate whether lesion size, depth and histopathology affect the diagnosis. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A total of 137 women with 145 lesions (79 malignant and 66 benign) found by palpation or mammography were prospectively enrolled in this study. The patients were examined by means of clinical breast examination, mammography, ultrasonography, and electrical impedance imaging with TransScan TS2000. A level of suspicion (LOS) post-processing algorithm (v2.67) was used for TS2000 lesion assessment. Imaging findings were correlated with cytologic (n=54) and histologic diagnoses (n=91). Patients with benign lesions were followed up for a mean of 36 months. RESULTS: TS2000 showed a high sensitivity (86%) which did not differ significantly from that of mammography (87%) and ultrasonography (US) (75%). The specificity of TS2000 (49%) was significantly lower compared to mammography (97%, P<0.0001) and US (100%, P<0.0001). The additive use of TS2000 to mammography and US yielded no significant increase in sensitivity (97%), but the decrease in specificity was significant (46%, P<0.0001). Diagnostic effectiveness of TS2000 (Az=0.68), as measured by the area under the ROC curve, was significantly lower than for mammography (Az=0.93, P<0.0001) and for US (Az=0.91, P<0.0001). When using TS2000 in addition to mammography and US (Az=0.86), a significant impairment was found (P=0.0003). CONCLUSION: The role of targeted electrical impedance imaging as an adjunct to mammography and ultrasonography in the diagnosis of breast lesions is not justified by the result of this study

Differential Effects of Single-Dose Escitalopram on Cognitive and Affective Interference during Stroop Task

Background and objective: Our aim was to study the regulatory role of serotonin [(5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT)] on two key nodes in the cognitive control networks – the anterior cingulate cortex (ACC) and the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC). We hypothesized that increasing the levels of 5-HT would preferentially modulate the activity in ACC during cognitive control during interference by negative affects compared to cognitive control during interference by a superimposed cognitive task. Methods: We performed a functional magnetic resonance imaging investigation on 11 healthy individuals, comparing the effects of the selective 5-HT reuptake inhibitor escitalopram on brain oxygenation level dependent signals in the ACC and the DLPFC using affective and cognitive counting Stroop paradigms (aStroop and cStroop). Results: Escitalopram significantly decreased the activity in rostral ACC during aStroop compared to cStroop (p < 0.05). In the absence of escitalopram, both aStroop and cStroop significantly activated ACC and DLPFC (Z ≥ 2.3, p < 0.05). Conclusion: We conclude that escitalopram in a region and task specific manner modified the cognitive control networks and preferentially decreased activity induced by affective interference in the ACC

Can contrast-enhanced MR imaging predict survival in breast cancer?

PURPOSE: To investigate the value of pre-operative contrast-enhanced MR imaging (CE-MRI) in predicting the disease-free and overall survival in breast cancer. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The study population consisted of 50 consecutive patients with histopathologically verified primary breast cancer who pre-operatively underwent CE-MRI examination between 1992 and 1993. A three-time point MR examination was performed where the enhancement rates (C1 and C2), signal enhancement ratio (SER=C1/C2) and washout (W=C1-C2) were calculated. The relation of these MR parameters to disease-free and overall survival was investigated. The median follow-up for surviving patients was 95 months. Univariate and multivariate statistical analyses were performed to evaluate the impact of different factors on prediction of survival. RESULTS: Of the MR parameters examined at univariate analysis, increased C1 (p=0.029), W (p=0.0081) and SER values (p=0.0081) were significantly associated with shorter disease-free survival, and only C1 (p=0.016) was related significantly to overall survival. Multivariate analysis for disease-free survival showed that the SER (p=0.014) and tumor size (p=0.001) were significant and independent predictors. Age (p=0.003), lymph node status (p=0.014), tumor size (p=0.039) and proliferating cell nuclear antigen index (p=0.053) remained independently associated with overall survival at multivariate analysis. C1 was not confirmed as an independent predictor of overall survival. CONCLUSION: Our findings support the presumption that CE-MRI is useful in predicting the disease-free survival in patients with breast cancer

Quantitative Assessment of 99mTc-Depreotide Uptake in Oesophageal Cancer and Precursor Conditions and Its Reflection in Immunohistochemically Detected Somatostatin Receptors

Background. Somatostatin receptors (SSTRs) are over-expressed in several tumors making it possible for imaging with labelled SSTR. A previous study showed feasibility to image oesophageal cancer with SSTR analogue 99mTc-depreotide. Purpose. (1) To investigate expression of the SSTRs in different types of esophageal carcinoma and (2) to correlate such an expression with 99mTc-depreotide uptake in these lesions. Material and Methods. Total 28 patients (17 with esophageal cancer and 11 with Barrett's esophagus) were examined with 99mTc-depreotide scintigraphy. The SSTR2A, SSTR2B, SSTR3, and SSTR5 were analyzed immunohistochemically in the lesion samples. Results. Among the patients with adenocarcinoma 10/11 expressed different amounts of SSTRs, while SSTRs were absent in 5/6 patients with Squamous cell carcinoma (Sqcc). There was no correlation neither between the 99mTc-depreotide uptake and the amount of SSTRs nor between the amount of SSTRs and differentiation grade of the tumor. Conclusions. (1) SSTRs are expressed in esophageal carcinoma and more abundantly so in adenocancer specimens; (2) in vivo 99mTc-depreotide uptake does not obviously correlate with the immunohistochemically detection of SSTRs of different subtypes in esophageal carcinoma

Circularity bias in abusive head trauma studies could be diminished with a new ranking scale

AbstractCausality in abusive head trauma has never been fully established and hence no gold standard exists for the diagnosis. Implications hereof include bias introduced by circular reasoning and a shift from a trustful doctor patient relationship to a distrustful one when the caregiver statement is questioned. In this paper we examine seven recent abusive head trauma studies including 476 diagnosed abuse cases for circular reasoning as well as the role of the caregiver statement in the diagnosis. Secondly, we present a novel ranking scale for the diagnosis of abusive head trauma designed to minimize circular reasoning. We found circularity to be a potential source of bias in all seven studies. The caregiver statement (lack of trauma mechanism or trauma mechanism considered incompatible with clinical findings) was listed as a diagnostic item in 329 (69%) of 476 cases. Applying our ranking scale to the abuse cases showed that the demands of our ranking scale were not fulfilled in 440 (92%) cases. We conclude that most abuse cases in the studies were, to some extent, diagnosed on criteria based on circular reasoning. The caregiver statement was one of the most frequently used diagnostic items. Hypothetically, caregivers offer no or inadequate explanation to the clinical findings in assumed abuse cases. Thus, when this feature is encountered, it is regarded as indicative of abuse adding further to the risk of circularity bias.We propose the use of our novel ranking scale in abusive head trauma research in an effort to minimize circular reasoning