Editorial Statement About JCCAP’s 2023 Special Issue on Informant Discrepancies in Youth Mental Health Assessments: Observations, Guidelines, and Future Directions Grounded in 60 Years of Research

Issue 1 of the 2011 Volume of the Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology (JCCAP) included a Special Section about the use of multi-informant approaches to measure child and adolescent (i.e., hereafter referred to collectively as “youth”) mental health (De Los Reyes, 2011). Researchers collect reports from multiple informants or sources (e.g., parent and peer, youth and teacher) to estimate a given youth’s mental health. The 2011 JCCAP Special Section focused on the most common outcome of these approaches, namely the significant discrepancies that arise when comparing estimates from any two informant’s reports (i.e., informant discrepancies). These discrepancies appear in assessments conducted across the lifespan (Achenbach, 2020). That said, JCCAP dedicated space to understanding informant discrepancies, because they have been a focus of scholarship in youth mental health for over 60 years (e.g., Achenbach et al., 1987; De Los Reyes & Kazdin, 2005; Glennon & Weisz, 1978; Kazdin et al., 1983; Kraemer et al., 2003; Lapouse & Monk, 1958; Quay et al., 1966; Richters, 1992; Rutter et al., 1970; van der Ende et al., 2012). Thus, we have a thorough understanding of the areas of research for which they reliably appear when clinically assessing youth. For instance, intervention researchers observe informant discrepancies in estimates of intervention effects within randomized controlled trials (e.g., Casey & Berman, 1985; Weisz et al., 2017). Service providers observe informant discrepancies when working with individual clients, most notably when making decisions about treatment planning (e.g., Hawley & Weisz, 2003; Hoffman & Chu, 2015). Scholars in developmental psychopathology observe these discrepancies when seeking to understand risk and protective factors linked to youth mental health concerns (e.g., Hawker & Boulton, 2000; Hou et al., 2020; Ivanova et al., 2022). Thus, the 2011 JCCAP Special Section posed a question: Might these informant discrepancies contain data relevant to understanding youth mental health? Suppose none of the work in youth mental health is immune from these discrepancies. In that case, the answer to this question strikes at the core of what we produce―from the interventions we develop and implement, to the developmental psychopathology research that informs intervention development

Exercise for Mood and Anxiety Disorders: The State-of-the Science [Editorial]

Item does not contain fulltext3 p

Experimental psychopathology

This chapter covers the topics and research questions of "Experimental Psychopathology" (EP) and the experimental tasks used to answer them. We describe historical roots and current models of EP, and we characterize its relevance for Clinical Psychology. The methods of EP are described in detail, illustrating the tasks which are used to study attention, associations, approach-avoidance tendencies, interpretation, memory, cognitive control, and learning processes. We also illustrate the path that EP research has taken from the experimental assessment of clinically relevant phenomena, via the induction of potentially causal processes and their therapeutic modification, to clinical applications

Panic disorder and agoraphobia: An overview and commentary of DSM-5 changes

Item does not contain fulltextThe recently published DSM-5 contains a number of changes pertinent to panic disorder and agoraphobia. These changes include separation of panic disorder and agoraphobia into separate diagnoses, the addition of criteria and guidelines for distinguishing agoraphobia from specific phobia, the addition of a 6-month duration requirement for agoraphobia, the addition of panic attacks as a specifier to any DSM-5 diagnosis, changes to descriptors of panic attack types, as well as various changes to the descriptive text. It is crucial that clinicians and researchers working with individuals presenting with panic attacks and panic-like symptoms understand these changes. The purpose of the current paper is to provide a summary of the main changes, to critique the changes in the context of available empirical evidence, and to highlight clinical implications and potential impact on mental health service utilization. Several of the changes have the potential to improve access to evidence-based treatment; yet, although certain changes appear justified in that they were based on converging evidence from different empirical sources, other changes appear questionable, at least based on the information presented in the DSM-5 text and related publications. Ongoing research of DSM-5 panic disorder and agoraphobia as well as application of the new diagnostic criteria in clinical contexts is needed to further inform the strengths and limitations of DSM-5 conceptualizations of panic disorder and agoraphobia.7 p

Cognitive processes in CBT

Automatic cognitive processing helps us navigate the world. However, if the emotional and cognitive interplay becomes skewed, those cognitive processes can become maladaptive and result in psychopathology. Although biases are present in most mental disorders, different disorders are characterized by biased processing in different cognitive domains, e.g., attention is changed in anxiety and memory in depression. Psychological treatments can indirectly (i.e., cognitive behavioral therapy) or directly (e.g., cognitive bias modification; mindfulness; metacognitive therapy) change biased cognitive processes. The fast majority of studies on cognitive processes and therapy are done in anxiety and depression, and to a lesser extent in addiction. There is evidence that (1) psychological treatments change cognitive processing styles and (2) that this change is a working mechanism of the different treatments. The specific type of cognitive process targeted does differ across treatment type, but we do not know at this point whether the change in one cognitive process generalizes to other cognitive processes. Maybe it is not enough to target just one bias. A better understanding of the processes involved in psychological treatments and their interaction with emotion, personality or the environmental context will help improve therapeutic interventions

The structure of post-traumatic stress symptoms in young survivors of war

Research on the dimensionality of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) has generally failed to provide support for the three clusters of PTSD suggested in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-IV). However, much research has been restricted to samples in North America and Western European countries. The aim of the current study was to test four alternative factor models among a relatively understudied population-young civilian survivors of war who had experienced war-related events as adolescents-in order to establish whether the factor structure of PTSD is consistent among various traumatized populations and age groups. Using the Posttraumatic Stress Diagnostic Scale, the results indicated that the four-factor model including intrusion, avoidance, hyperarousal, and numbing factors provided a better fit than the three-factor model suggested by the DSM-IV. The current study offers additional support from another population for a four-factor model of PTSD that implies a separation of avoidance and numbing items. Case conceptualization and treatment implications are discussed