Evaluating the effect of interventions for strengthening non-physician anesthetists’ education in Ethiopia: a pre- and post-evaluation study

Background: Access to safe surgery has been recognized as an indispensable component of universal health coverage. A competent anesthesia workforce is a prerequisite for safe surgical care. In Ethiopia, non-physician anesthetists are the main anesthesia service providers. The Government of Ethiopia implemented a program intervention to improve the quality of non-physician anesthetists’ education, which included faculty development, curricula strengthening, student support, educational resources, improved infrastructure and upgraded regulations. This study aimed to assess changes following the implementation of this program. Methods: A pre-and post-evaluation design was employed to evaluate improvement in the quality of non-physician anesthetists’ education. A 10-station objective structured clinical examination (OSCE) was administered to graduating class anesthetists of 2016 (n = 104) to assess changes in competence from a baseline study performed in 2013 (n = 122). Moreover, a self-administered questionnaire was used to collect data on students’ perceptions of the learning environment. Results: The overall competence score of 2016 graduates was significantly higher than the 2013 class (65.7% vs. 61.5%, mean score difference = 4.2, 95% CI = 1.24–7.22, p 0.05 in favor of females), and female students scored better in some stations. Student perceptions of the learning environment improved significantly for almost all items, with the largest percentage point increase in the availability of instructors from 38.5 to 70.2% (OR = 3.76, 95% CI = 2.15–6.55, p < 0.05). Conclusion: The results suggest that the quality of non-physician anesthetists’ education has improved. Stagnation in competence scores of some stations and student perceptions of the simulated learning environment require specific attention

Impact of anesthetist licensing examination on quality of education in Ethiopia: a qualitative study of faculty and student perceptions

Abstract Background Ethiopia drastically increased the anesthesia workforce density by training ‘associate clinician anesthetists’ as a task-shifting and sharing strategy. However, there were growing concerns about educational quality and patient safety. Accordingly, the Ministry of Health introduced the anesthetist national licensing examination (NLE) to assure the quality of education. However, empirical evidence is scarce to support or refute the overall impact of NLEs, which are relatively costly for low- and middle-income settings. Therefore, this study aimed to explore the impact of introducing NLE on anesthetists’ education in Ethiopia. Methods We conducted a qualitative study using a constructivist grounded theory approach. Data were prospectively collected from ten anesthetist teaching institutions. Fifteen in-depth interviews were conducted with instructors and academic leaders, and six focus groups were held with students and recently tested anesthetists. Additional data were gathered by analyzing relevant documents, including versions of curricula, academic committee minutes, program quality review reports, and faculty appraisal reports. Interviews and group discussions were audiotaped, transcribed verbatim and analyzed using Atlas.ti 9 software. Results Both faculty and students demonstrated positive attitudes toward the NLE. Student motivation, faculty performance, and curriculum strengthening were the three primary changes that emerged, resulting in three subsequent spin-offs on assessment, learning, and quality management practices. Academic leaders’ dedication to evaluating examination data and turning these into action led to changes that improved education quality. Increased accountability, engagement, and collaboration were the predominant factors facilitating change. Conclusion Our study indicates that the Ethiopian NLE has prompted anesthesia teaching institutions to improve their teaching, learning, and assessment practices. However, more work is required to improve exam acceptability among stakeholders and drive broader changes