Water Resources Management: Comparative of Law Indonesia and India

In Indonesia philosophically the existence of Article 33 Paragraph (3) of the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia, the incarnation of the Five Principles of Pancasila is justice for all Indonesian people, where water as one of the national wealth which is the needs of the people controlled by the state in the framework of providing justice and prosperity For all the people of Indonesia, whereas in India water resources arrangements are still formed from different components, including international treaties, federal and state rules as well as customary law. The national water law arrangements in India are more developed than the international water law, but India does not have comprehensive water management. The existing water law framework in India is characterized by the existence of a number of different principles, rules and actions adopted over the decades of colonial law. This includes the principles of general law and irrigation provisions of the colonial period.Keywords: water rights, justice and prosperity, principles of common law

Implications of Marriage Between Employees of The Same Company Against Work Relationship (Case Study on The Decision of Constitutional Court of The Republic of Indonesia Number 13/PUU-Xv/2017)

Labor serves a very crucial factor for economic development and growth in each country. Economic growth is one of the most important indicators for the recruitment of workers. Additionally labor is one of the supporting factors in the production process. In employing the workers, employers must pay attention to human rights, for example, companies are not permitted to prohibit their employees from marrying their colleagues in one company because such a prohibition is a violation of human rights. Therefore the Constitutional Court judge had conducted a material test on the provisions of Article 153 paragraph (1) letter f of Law Number 13/2003 concerning Employment, and decided to remove the prohibition on marriage between employees in one company.The consideration of the Constitutional Court Judge to remove the provisions on the prohibition of marriage between employees in one company is because it is not in accordance with the provisions of Article 27 paragraph (2), Article 28 B paragraph (1), Article 28D paragraph (2) of the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia, Article 38 paragraph (1) and (2) Law Number 39 Year 1999 concerning Human Rights, and also contradicts the Article 6 paragraph (1) concerning the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights. The decision of the Constitutional Court Judge is a form of legal protection against constitutional rights for workers. Keywords: Marriage, Between Employees, Decision of the Constitutional Court. DOI: 10.7176/JLPG/87-20 Publication date:July 31st 201