33 research outputs found

    Outcome assessment in epilepsy: available rating scales for adults and methodological issues pertaining to the development of scales for childhood epilepsy.

    Get PDF
    During the past decade, several scales have been developed to improve the assessment of outcome in epilepsy. These scales were developed for adults and their reliability, validity and usefulness have been established. However, there is also a need for alternative measures of outcome in childhood epilepsy, especially a measure of seizure severity (SS) and measures pertaining to quality of life (QoL). Four of these adult scales are reviewed and compared to examine their applicability in childhood epilepsy. Two important methodological differences between them are discussed: (a) patient self-report vs. physician-based scales and (b) generic vs. disease-specific instruments. QoL in epilepsy is briefly reviewed. Severity of seizures and severity of side-effects are relatively neglected areas of importance to QoL in epilepsy. The existing instruments for adults are not appropriate for children in their present form. Some specific methodological issues, which are relevant for the development of scales for children with epilepsy, are subsequently discussed. New scales pertaining to physical and psychosocial aspects of QoL in childhood epilepsy are being developed. In the near future, data on their reliability, validity and usefulness will become available. A combination of scales focusing on specific aspects of QoL, including SS and severity of adverse effects, and more traditional clinical data may provide a more complete assessment of outcome in childhood epilepsy

    Parent-completed scales for measuring seizure severity and severity of side-effects of antiepileptic drugs in childhood epilepsy: development and psychometric analysis.

    Get PDF
    We have developed two outcome measures for childhood epilepsy: a seizure severity (SS) scale and a side-effects (SE) scale. Both scales have been designed for completion by parents. The scales were tested in two pilot phases and the results of this stepwise analysis are described here. The final scales' psychometric properties were assessed in a group of 80 children with active epilepsy, representative of the population at whom the scales were aimed: children with chronic epilepsy, aged 4-16 years, including all seizure types and epilepsies, as well as children with neurological comorbidity. The SS scale and SE scale showed good internal consistency and test-retest stability. Although there was a significant positive correlation between the SS scale and the SE scale, this was low, indicating that the scales measure a different clinical trait. The SE scale consisted of two subscales: a Toxic subscale, measuring the severity of dose-related side-effects, and a Chronic subscale, measuring the severity of long-term behavioural and cognitive side-effects. These subscales for side-effects showed a high correlation and can be used as a joint scale. These scales have the potential to improve outcome assessment in childhood epilepsy and they can be used to assess important aspects of quality of life in this population

    Benign familial infantile convulsions: A clinical study of seven Dutch families

    Get PDF
    Benign familial infantile convulsions (BFIC) is a recently identified partial epilepsy syndrome with onset between 3 and 12 months of age. We describe the clinical characteristics and outcome of 43 patients with BFIC from six Dutch families and one Dutch-Canadian family and the encountered difficulties in classifying the syndrome. Four families had a pure BFIC phenotype; in two families BFIC was accompanied by paroxysmal kinesigenic dyskinesias; in one family BFIC was associated with later onset focal epilepsy in older generations. Onset of seizures was between 6 weeks and 10 months, and seizures remitted before the age of 3 years in all patients with BFIC. In all, 29 (67%) of the 43 patients had been treated with anti-epileptic drugs for a certain period of time. BFIC is often not recognized as (hereditary) epilepsy by the treating physician. Seizures often remit shortly after the start of anti-epileptic drugs but, because of the benign course of the syndrome and the spontaneous remission of seizures, patients with low seizure fr

    Mutations in TITF-1 are associated with benign hereditary chorea

    Get PDF
    Benign hereditary chorea (BHC) (MIM 118700) is an autosomal dominant movement disorder. The early onset of symptoms (usually before the age of 5 years) and the observation that in some BHC families the symptoms tend to decrease in adulthood suggests that the disorder results from a developmental disturbance of the brain. In contrast to Huntington disease (MIM 143100), BHC is non-progressive and patients have normal or slightly below normal intelligence. There is considerable inter- and intrafamilial variability, including dysarthria, axial dystonia and gait disturbances. Previously, we identified a locus for BHC on chromosome 14 and subsequently identified additional independent families linked to the same locus. Recombination analysis of all chromosome 14-linked families resulted initially in a reduction of the critical interval for the BHC gene to 8.4 cM between markers D14S49 and D14S278. More detailed analysis of the critical region in a small BHC family revealed a de novo deletion of 1.2 Mb harboring the TITF-1 gene, a homeodomain-containing transcription factor essential for the organogenesis of the lung, thyroid and the basal ganglia. Here we report evidence that mutations in TITF-1 are associated with BHC

    Multi-system signs and symptoms in X-linked ataxia carriers

    Get PDF
    Contains fulltext : 22536___.PDF (publisher's version ) (Open Access

    Een lelijk eendje?

    No full text

    Multi-system signs and symptoms in X-linked ataxia carriers.

    No full text
    Item does not contain fulltex

    The pediatrician and diagnosis of developmental delay

    No full text
    In this study we report the retrospective analysis of a diagnostic work-up, comparing the yield of causal diagnoses in 45 children with developmental delay (DD: intelligence quotient (IQ) 70-80) and 68 with mild mental retardation (MMR IQ 50-70). We also compare associated medical problems in the study population with those found in a mainstream reference population. Results: No differences in diagnostic yield between the two groups were seen. Causal diagnoses were found in 55% of the children in both groups and were equally distributed over hereditary, acquired and familial causes. In 27% genetically and/or clinically defined syndromes were found. In most cases clinical history and multidisciplinary physical examination were crucial for establishing the diagnosis. Associated medical problems are frequent in both groups (35%) and the prevalence of epilepsy, hearing loss, growth retardation and behavioural disorders is higher than in a mainstream reference population. Referral for motor rehabilitation (70%), psychiatric treatment (15%) and genetic counselling (60%) followed the diagnostic process. Conclusion: In this study in one out of two children a cause was found. The yield of causal diagnoses in children with an IQ of 70-80 (DD) was equal to that in children with an IQ of 50-70 (MMR). Associated problems were found more often than in healthy children and caused additional restrictions. A multidisciplinary approach is recommended and should not be restricted to children fitting the definition of mental retardation. A prospective study is needed to evaluate the diagnostic yield with newer genetic and neuroimaging techniques

    [Questionable basis for 'hopeless and unbearable suffering' as the criterion for the active termination of life in newborns with spina bifida],[Questionable basis for 'hopeless and unbearable suffering' as the criterion for the active termination of life in newborns with spina bifida]

    No full text
    Item does not contain fulltextIs 'hopeless and unbearable suffering' a just criterion for the deliberate termination of life of newborns with spina bifida? Hopeless suffering, with no means of alleviation, is not applicable in the acute phase of spina bifida in newborns, but to the chronic suffering that comes later on as the result of pain and discomfort experienced by the patient. There is a need for a nationwide discussion on (a) how can we determine when acute or chronic suffering become hopeless and unbearable, and on what basis should a given situation be regarded as an 'emergency situation'?; (b) what qualifies as a very severe form of spina bifida?; (c) what kind of care should be provided after the decision to withhold active care
    corecore