A single-institution study of concordance of pathological diagnoses for interstitial lung diseases between pre-transplantation surgical lung biopsies and lung explants

Abstract Background By comparing diagnoses made by pre-transplant surgical lung biopsy (SLB) and the final pathologic diagnosis of the explanted pathology (EP), we aimed to study the factors that could impact pathologic diagnoses in patients with interstitial lung disease (ILD). Methods We retrospectively reviewed the lung transplant database at Cleveland Clinic [01/01/2006–12/31/2013] to include all lung transplant recipients with a prior diagnosis of ILD. Two pulmonary pathologists independently reviewed each SLB and lung explant. The diagnoses were labeled as concordant (same diagnosis on SLB and explant) or discordant (diagnosis on SLB and explant were different) by consensus. Results Of 389 patients transplanted for ILD, 217 had an SLB before transplant. Pathological diagnoses were concordant in 190 patients (87.6%) [165 UIP (86.8%), 13 NSIP (6.8%), 8 CHP (4.2%) and 4 other diagnoses (2.1%). In 27 cases (12.4%), the diagnosis on SLB differed from EP. 8/27 were diagnosed with UIP on SLB and of these, 5 were re-classified as NSIP. 14/19 (73.7%) patients with a SLB diagnosis “other than UIP” were re-categorized as UIP based on explant. Discordant cases had a greater time between SLB and EP than concordant cases (1553 days vs 1248 days). Conclusions The pathologic diagnosis of ILD by SLB prior to lung transplant is accurate in most patients, but may be misleading in a small subset of patients. The majority of discordant cases that were reclassified as UIP could be due to a sampling error, or perhaps, an increased time from the date of the SLB to transplant. Future studies examining how multidisciplinary consensus diagnosis affects this discordance are necessary

Banff study of pathologic changes in lung allograft biopsy specimens with donor-specific antibodies

Background The diagnosis of antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) in the lung transplant is still an area under investigation. We performed a blinded multicenter study to determine if any statistically significant histologic findings in transbronchial biopsy specimens from lung transplant patients correlate with the presence of donor-specific antibodies (DSAs). Methods We asked 9 pathologists with experience in lung transplantation to evaluate 161 lung transplant biopsy specimens for various histologic parameters. The findings were correlated with antibody status positive for DSAs, positive for non-DSAs, and no antibodies (NABs) present. The significance of each histologic variable was reviewed. Results We found no statistically significant association with acute cellular rejection, airway inflammation, or bronchiolitis obliterans and the presence or absence of antibodies. However, biopsy specimens with DSAs had a statistically significant difference vs NABs in the setting of acute lung injury, with or without diffuse alveolar damage (p = 0.0008), in the presence of capillary neutrophilic inflammation (p = 0.0014), and in samples with endotheliitis (p = 0.0155). In samples with complement 4d staining, there was a trend but no statistically significant difference between specimens associated with DSAs and specimens with NABs. Conclusions Capillary inflammation, acute lung injury, and endotheliitis significantly correlated with DSAs. The infrequently observed diffuse staining for complement 4d limits the usefulness of this stain.SCOPUS: ar.jinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishe