Cell Cycle-Related Cyclin B1 Quantification

To obtain non-relative measures of cell proteins, purified preparations of the same proteins are used as standards in Western blots. We have previously quantified SV40 large T antigen expressed over a several fold range in different cell lines and correlated the average number of molecules to average fluorescence obtained by cytometry and determined cell cycle phase related expression by calculation from multi-parametric cytometry data. Using a modified approach, we report quantification of endogenous cyclin B1 and generation of the cell cycle time related expression profile.Recombinant cyclin B1 was purified from a baculovirus lysate using an antibody affinity column and concentrated. We created fixed cell preparations from nocodazole-treated (high cyclin B1) and serum starved (low cyclin B1) PC3 cells that were either lyophilized (for preservation) or solubilized. The lysates and purified cyclin B1 were subjected to Western blotting; the cell preparations were subjected to cytometry, and fluorescence was correlated to molecules. Three untreated cell lines (K562, HeLa, and RKO) were prepared for cytometry without lyophilization and also prepared for Western blotting. These were quantified by Western blotting and by cytometry using the standard cell preparations.The standard cell preparations had 1.5 x 10(5) to 2.5 x 10(6) molecules of cyclin B1 per cell on average (i.e., 16-fold range). The average coefficient of variation was 24%. Fluorescence varied 12-fold. The relationship between molecules/cell (Western blot) and immunofluorescence (cytometry) was linear (r(2) = 0.87). Average cyclin B1 levels for the three untreated cell lines determined by Western blotting and cytometry agreed within a factor of 2. The non-linear rise in cyclin B1 in S phase was quantified from correlated plots of cyclin B1 and DNA content. The peak levels achieved in G2 were similar despite differences in lineage, growth conditions, and rates of increase through the cell cycle (range: 1.6-2.2 x 10(6) molecules per cell).Net cyclin B1 expression begins in G1 in human somatic cells lines; increases non-linearly with variation in rates of accumulation, but peaks at similar peak values in different cell lines growing under different conditions. This suggests tight quantitative end point control

The APC/C recruits cyclin B1–Cdk1–Cks in prometaphase before D box recognition to control mitotic exit

Prior associations with the APC/C complex during prometaphase makes cyclin B1 a better substrate for the cell cycle–regulating ubiquitin ligase in metaphase (see also a related paper by Di Fiore et al. in this issue)

Understanding the limitations of radiation-induced cell cycle checkpoints

The DNA damage response pathways involve processes of double-strand break (DSB) repair and cell cycle checkpoint control to prevent or limit entry into S phase or mitosis in the presence of unrepaired damage. Checkpoints can function to permanently remove damaged cells from the actively proliferating population but can also halt the cell cycle temporarily to provide time for the repair of DSBs. Although efficient in their ability to limit genomic instability, checkpoints are not foolproof but carry inherent limitations. Recent work has demonstrated that the G1/S checkpoint is slowly activated and allows cells to enter S phase in the presence of unrepaired DSBs for about 4–6 h post irradiation. During this time, only a slowing but not abolition of S-phase entry is observed. The G2/M checkpoint, in contrast, is quickly activated but only responds to a level of 10–20 DSBs such that cells with a low number of DSBs do not initiate the checkpoint or terminate arrest before repair is complete. Here, we discuss the limitations of these checkpoints in the context of the current knowledge of the factors involved. We suggest that the time needed to fully activate G1/S arrest reflects the existence of a restriction point in G1-phase progression. This point has previously been defined as the point when mitogen starvation fails to prevent cells from entering S phase. However, cells that passed the restriction point can respond to DSBs, albeit with reduced efficiency

MDM2 and MDMX inhibit the transcriptional activity of ectopically expressed SMAD proteins

Transforming growth factor-beta (TGF-beta) inhibits cell proliferation in many cell types, and acquisition of TGF-beta resistance has been linked to tumorigenesis. One class of proteins that plays a key role in the TGF-beta signal transduction pathway is the SMAD protein family. MDM2, a key negative regulator of p53, has recently been shown to suppress TGF-beta-induced growth arrest in a p53-independent manner. Here we show that MDM2 and the structurally related protein MDMX can inhibit the transcriptional activity of ectopically expressed SMAD1, SMAD2, SMAD3, and SMAD4. Immunofluorescence staining indicated that ectopically expressed SMAD4 was present in both the cytoplasm and nucleus, and MDM2 and NIDMX were localized mainly to the nucleus and cytoplasm, respectively. When SMAD4 was coexpressed with either MDM2 or MDMX, nuclear accumulation of SMAD4 was strikingly inhibited. We have no evidence that SMAD4 binds directly to MDM2 or MDMX; hence, the inactivation and nuclear exclusion of SMAD4 by MDM2/MDMX may involve other indirect mechanisms.link_to_subscribed_fulltex

Stem cells in microfluidics

10.1002/btpr.171Biotechnology Progress25152-6

MDM2 and MDMX can interact differently with ARF and members of the p53 family

Members of the p53 family of transcription factors have essential roles in tumor suppression and in development. MDM2 is an essential regulator of p53 that can inhibit the transcriptional activity of p53, shuttle p53 out of the nucleus, and target p53 for ubiquitination-mediated degradation. Little is known about the interaction and selectivity of different members of the p53 family (p53, p63, and p73) and the MDM2 family (MDM2 and MDMX). Here we show that the transcriptional activities of p53 and p73, but not that of p63, were inhibited by both MDM2 and MDMX. Consistent with these, we found that MDMX can physically interact with p53 and p73, but not with p63. Moreover, ectopically expressed MDM2 and MDMX could induce alterations in the subcellular localization of p73, but did not affect the subcellular localization of p53 and p63. Finally, we demonstrate that while ARF can interact with MDM2 and inhibit the regulation of p53 by MDM2, no interaction was found between ARF and MDMX. These data reveal that significant differences and selectivity exist between the regulation of different members of the p53 family by MDM2 and MDMX.link_to_subscribed_fulltex

The relative contribution of CHK1 and CHK2 to Adriamycin-induced checkpoint

Topoisomerase II poisons like Adriamycin (ADR, doxorubicin) are clinically important chemotherapeutic agents. Adriamycin-induced DNA damage checkpoint activates ATM and ATR, which could in turn inhibit the cell cycle engine through either CHK1 or CHK2. In this study, we characterized whether CHK1 or CHK2 is required for Adriamycin-induced checkpoint. We found that both CHK1 and CHK2 were phosphorylated after Adriamycin treatment. Several lines of evidence from dominant-negative mutants, short hairpin RNA (shRNA), and knockout cells indicated that CHK1, but not CHK2, is critical for Adriamycin-induced cell cycle arrest. Disruption of CHK1 function bypassed the checkpoint, as manifested by the increase in CDC25A, activation of CDC2, increase in histone H3 phosphorylation, and reduction in cell survival after Adriamycin treatment. In contrast, CHK2 is dispensable for Adriamycin-induced responses. Finally, we found that CHK1 was upregulated in primary hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), albeit as an inactive form. The presence of a stockpile of dormant CHK1 in cancer cells may have important implications for treatments like topoisomerase II poisons. Collectively, the available data underscore the pivotal role of CHK1 in checkpoint responses to a variety of stresses. © 2004 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.link_to_subscribed_fulltex

Transient inter-cellular polymeric linker

10.1016/j.biomaterials.2007.04.034Biomaterials28253656-366

Hepatocyte function within a stacked double sandwich culture plate cylindrical bioreactor for bioartificial liver system

10.1016/j.biomaterials.2012.06.078Biomaterials33327925-7932BIMA