Calcification score versus arterial stenosis grading: comparison of two CT-based methods for risk assessment of anastomotic leakage after esophagectomy and gastric pull-up

Purpose: Anastomotic leakage is a major surgical complication following esophagectomy and gastric pull-up. Specific risk factors such as celiac trunk (TC) stenosis and high calcification score of the aorta have been identified, but no data are available on their relative prognostic values. This retrospective study aimed to compare and evaluate calcification score versus stenosis quantification with regards to prognostic impact on anastomotic leakage. Patients and methods: Preoperative contrast-enhanced computed tomography scans of 164 consecutive patients with primary esophageal cancer were evaluated by two radiologists to apply a calcification score (0-3 scale) assessing the aorta, the celiac axis and the right and left postceliac arteries. Concurrently, the presence and degree of stenosis of TC and superior mesenteric artery were recorded for stenosis quantification. Results: Anastomotic leakage was noted in 14/164 patients and 12/14 showed stenosis of TC (n=11). The presence of TC stenosis was found to have a significant impact on anastomotic healing (p=0.004). The odds ratio for the prediction of anastomotic leakage by the degree of stenosis was 1.04 (95% CI, 1.02-1.07). Ten of 14 patients had aortic calcification scores of 1 or 2, but calcification scores of the aorta, the celiac axis and the right and left postceliac arteries did not correlate with the corresponding TC stenosis values and showed no influence on patient outcome as defined by the occurrence of anastomotic insufficiency (p=0.565, 0.855, 0.518 and 1.000, respectively). Inter-reader reliability of computed tomography analysis and absolute agreement on calcium scoring was mostly over 90%. No significant differences in preoperative comorbidities and patient characteristics were found between those with and without anastomotic leakage. Conclusion: Measurement of TC stenosis in preoperative contrast-enhanced computed tomography scans proved to be more reliable than calcification scores in predicting anastomotic leakage and should, therefore, be used in the risk assessment of patients undergoing esophagectomy and gastric pull-up

Current and future treatment options for esophageal cancer in the elderly

Introduction: Esophageal cancer is the eighth most common cancer globally and has the sixth worst prognosis because of its aggressiveness and poor survival. Data regarding cancer treatment in older patients is limited because the elderly have been under-represented in clinical trials. Therefore, we reviewed the existing literature regarding treatment results for elderly patients (70+ years).Areas covered: We used pubmed to analyze the actual literature according to elderly esophageal cancer patients with subheading of incidence, esophagectomy, chemoradiation or chemotherapy. The main points of interest were treatment options for patients with Barrett's esophagus or early carcinoma, advanced tumor stages, and inoperable cancer.Expert opinion: The incidence of esophageal cancer has been increasing over the past thirty years, with a rapid increase of esophageal adenocarcinoma in Western industrialized nations. Patients aged over 60years have been particularly affected. In this review, we have shown that elderly patients with esophageal cancer have various alternatives for adequate treatment. Clinical evaluation of comorbidity is necessary to make treatment decisions. Therapeutic options for early carcinomas are endoscopic or surgical resection. For elderly patients with advanced carcinomas, preoperative chemoradiation or chemotherapy should be discussed

Surgical approach to advanced Siewert II cancer: beyond the borders? The West Side

The surgical approach to Siewert type II cancer should be individualized as there is no one size fits all option. Criteria for individualization are epidemiological, functional, oncologic and surgical items. However, our preferred procedure for advanced adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction type II is esophagectomy, if this or transhiatal extended gastrectomy are both possible with R0 resection. Esophagectomy has the advantages of a longer esophageal safety margin, complete mediastinal lymphadenectomy, easier anastomosis, routine minimal invasive gastrolysis with abdominal lymphadenectomy and preservation of a gastric reservoir

ERCC1: impact in multimodality treatment of upper gastrointestinal cancer

Platinum-based drugs and radiation are key elements of multimodality treatment in a wide variety of solid tumors and especially tumors of the upper gastrointestinal tract. Cytotoxicity is directly related to their ability to cause DNA damage. This event consecutively triggers the nucleotide excision repair (NER) complex. The NER capacity has a major impact on chemo and radiation sensitivity, emergence of resistance and patient outcome. Excision repair cross-complementing group 1 (ERCC1) is a key molecule in NER. This review provides an overview of the NER complex with a focus on ERCC1. Recent literature has been analyzed and provides information regarding the potential role of ERCC1 as a prognostic factor in multimodality treatment of upper gastrointestinal cancer and cancer risk. To date, the role of ERCC1 as a predictive marker for individual multimodality treatment is far from being firmly established for routine use. However, with reliable methods, established cut-off values and validation in large, prospective, randomized trials, ERCC1 may possibly prove to play an important role as a tumor marker in individualized treatment for upper gastrointestinal cancer

Neoadjuvant treatment for advanced esophageal cancer: response assessment before surgery and how to predict response to chemoradiation before starting treatment

Patients with advanced esophageal cancer (T3-4, N) have a poor prognosis. Chemoradiation or chemotherapy before esophagectomy with adequate lymphadenectomy is the standard treatment for patients with resectable advanced esophageal carcinoma. However, only patients with major histopathologic response (regression to less than 10% of the primary tumor) after preoperative treatment will have a prognostic benefit of preoperative chemoradiation. Using current therapy regimens about 40% to 50% of the patients show major histopathological response. The remaining cohort does not benefit from this neoadjuvant approach but might benefit from earlier surgical resection. Therefore, it is an aim to develop tools for response prediction before starting the treatment and for early response assessment identifying responders. The current review discusses the different imaging techniques and the most recent studies about molecular markers for early response prediction. The results show that [F-18]-fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) has a good sensitivity but the specificity is not robust enough for routine clinical use. Newer positron emission tomography detector technology, the combination of FDG-PET with computed tomography, additional evaluation criteria and standardization of evaluation may improve the predictive value. There exist a great number of retrospective studies using molecular markers for prediction of response. Until now the clinical use is missing. But the results of first prospective studies are promising. A future perspective may be the combination of imaging technics and special molecular markers for individualized therapy. Another aspect is the response assessment after finishing neoadjuvant treatment protocol. The different clinical methods are discussed. The results show that until now no non-invasive method is valid enough to assess complete histopathological response

Treatment of early gastric cancer in the Western World

The incidence rate of gastric cancer is much higher in Asia than in the Western industrial nations. According to the different screening programs in Japan and Korea about fifty percent of treated patients had an early tumor stage. In contrast, European and American patients with gastric cancer had an advanced tumor stage. Therefore, the experience for the various therapeutic options for gastric cancer may be different between these regions. In this review we tried to point out the treatment modalities in Western industrial countries for early gastric cancer. (C) 2014 Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved

Predicting response to neoadjuvant therapy in esophageal cancer

Despite improvements in preoperative staging, surgical techniques and postoperative care, the 5-year survival rate of patients with locally advanced esophageal cancer remains only approximately 15-40%. Therefore, multimodality treatment options have been widely promoted in the therapy of this malignant disease. However, recent meta-analyses evaluating randomized trials of neoadjuvant therapy protocols prior to surgery for patients with advanced esophageal cancer showed only modest improvement of survival for the whole treatment group. Among these patients, those with excellent histopathologic response seem to benefit greatly from neoadjuvant regimens. Therefore, predictive markers to allow individualization of multimodality therapy in locally advanced esophageal cancer are needed to identify those who will benefit the most. Unfortunately, there is still a great lack of markers for response assessment in patients with esophageal cancer undergoing multimodality therapy. Endoscopy, endoscopic biopsies, computed tomography and endoscopic ultrasound do not seem to provide reliable information for assessing the response to neoadjuvant therapy. Whether F-18-fluorodeoxyglucose-PET can effectively characterize responders in neoadjuvant therapy protocols remains controversial. Finally, although results of mostly retrospective studies on molecular factors for response assessment in esophageal cancer patients are promising, these markers do not yet provide a reliable and cost-effective molecular tool for utilization in clinical practice