Difficulties with endograft sizing in a patient with traumatic rupture of the thoracic aorta: The possible influence of hypovolemic shock

A patient with traumatic thoracic injury and hypovolemic shock is presented to stress important differences in preoperative and postoperative aortic diameters. The patient had a blood pressure of 80/40 mm Hg. A diagnostic computed tomography angiography revealed a rupture of the thoracic aorta, and a thoracic endograft was sized based on these data. However, the postoperative computed tomography angiography (Riva-Rocci, 164/70 mm Hg) showed an increase in aortic diameters of about 30% at multiple levels. In this patient, with rupture of the thoracic aorta and hypovolemia, the aortic diameter was significantly decreased. This indicates that adequate preoperative sizing for endovascular repair of vascular pathology in patients in shock is complicated

Vorasidenib (VOR; AG-881), an inhibitor of mutant IDH1 and IDH2, in patients (pts) with recurrent/progressive glioma: Updated results from the phase I non-enhancing glioma population

2504 Background: Isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 and 2 mutations (m IDH1/2) occur in approximately 70% and 4% of low-grade gliomas (LGGs), respectively, promoting oncogenesis via increased production of D-2-hydroxyglutarate. In this ongoing phase 1 trial, VOR, a potent, oral, reversible, brain-penetrant, first-in-class dual inhibitor of mIDH1/2, is being evaluated in advanced m IDH1/2 solid tumors, including gliomas. Safety and preliminary results were presented previously (Mellinghoff et al., J Clin Oncol 2018). Here, we report updated data for the non-enhancing glioma pt population. Methods: Pts with recurrent/progressive m IDH1/2 glioma received VOR daily (continuous 28-day cycles). Key eligibility criteria included: ≥18 years; histologically or cytologically confirmed glioma with documented m IDH1/2; ECOG 0-2; and evaluable disease by RANO-LGG criteria. Dose escalation cohorts enrolled using a Bayesian logistic regression model (BLRM) escalation guided by the overdose control (EWOC). Tumor response was evaluated by MRI every 8 weeks using RANO-LGG criteria by local assessment. Results: As of 28 Nov 2019, 22 pts with non-enhancing glioma had received VOR and 8 (36%) remain on treatment. M/F, 8/14; grade 2/3, 17/5; median age, 47 years; m IDH1/2, 20/1; 1p19q intact, 9/22; median (range) number of prior systemic therapies, 2 (1–4). Common (≥5 pts) treatment-emergent adverse events (AEs) of any grade and regardless of causality included increased ALT/AST (63.6%/59.1%), headache (45.5%), nausea (40.9%), neutropenia (31.8%), fatigue and hyperglycemia (27.3% each), and seizures and decreased white blood cell count (22.7% each). Transaminase elevations were grade 1 in severity at dose levels < 100mg and were less frequent (5 [38.5%] of 13 pts). Three subjects had related grade ≥3 AEs; 2 discontinued due to AEs. Objective response rate was 13.6% (1 partial response, 2 minor responses), and 17 (77.3%) pts achieved stable disease. 60.5% of pts were progression free and alive at 24 months. Conclusions: In this previously treated population with non-enhancing glioma, VOR was associated with a favorable safety profile. The study results also show encouraging preliminary activity within that population, with PFS duration extending to 24 months or longer in 60% of participants. A global randomized phase 3 study of VOR in grade 2 non-enhancing glioma pts who have had surgery only is currently enrolling (NCT04164901). Clinical trial information: NCT02481154