43 research outputs found

    Interstitial lung disease and CDK4/6 inhibitors in the treatment of breast cancer

    No full text
    CDK4/6 inhibitors have changed the treatment paradigm of many patients living with metastatic and early-stage high-risk hormone receptor (HR)-positive breast cancer. Even though patients and clinicians are aware and learning how to manage common adverse events, such as bone marrow suppression and gastrointestinal toxicities, there are less common and potentially severe adverse events, such as interstitial lung disease (ILD), that require special consideration. In this narrative review, we discuss the incidence, mechanism, and treatment of CDK4/6 inhibitor associated ILD. CDK4/6 inhibitors in combination with endocrine therapy (ET) are standard treatment for HR-positive, HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer and for selected patients with early stage HR-positive breast cancer. Common toxicities of these medications are often controlled with dose reductions, dose interruptions, and/or prophylactic medications, such as antidiarrheals. However, there are a small subset of patients at risk for less common and potentially severe toxicities, such as ILD. Individualized risk should be considered, including underlying lung disease, thrombosis risk and drug-drug interactions, in order to counsel patients about the risk of ILD.</p

    Extensive Consensus Docking Evaluation for Ligand Pose Prediction and Virtual Screening Studies

    No full text
    Molecular docking strategies are one of the most widely used techniques for predicting the binding mode of a ligand and for obtaining new hits in virtual screening studies. In order to improve the accuracy of this approach, we tested the reliability of applying a consensus docking protocol by combining ten different docking procedures. The analysis was carried out in terms of consensus cross-docking and by using an enriched database. The results highlight that from a qualitative point of view consensus docking is able to predict the ligand binding pose better than the single docking programs and is also able to give hints concerning the reliability of the docking pose. With regard to the virtual screening studies, consensus docking was evaluated for three different targets of the Directory of Useful Decoys (DUD), and the obtained results suggest that this approach performs as well as the best available methods found in the literature, therefore supporting the idea that this procedure can be profitably applied for the identification of new hits

    ERalpha CD domain interacts with Pin1.

    No full text
    <p>A) Schematic representation of ERalpha domains, showing the predicted prolyl isomerase sites (Ser/Thr-Pro). B) ERalpha cDNA was split into three different domains (AB, CD, EF) and tagged with histidine. GST or GST-Pin1 pull-down assay was performed in 293FT cells and analyzed by Western blot with anti-6×His antibody. C) Site-directed mutagenesis was performed to replace Serine 294 with Alanine on the ERalphaCD domain. Plasmids with wild-type (w) or mutant (m) CD His-tagged domain were transfected in 293FT cells and pulled down with GST-Pin1 protein. Anti-His antibody was used in Western blots to detect the interaction.</p

    Extramitochondrial sodium concentration affects glutamate-induced ATP synthesis.

    No full text
    <p>Effect of different Na<sup>+</sup> concentrations on ATP synthesis in SH-SY5Y (A) and C6 (B) mitochondria. The glutamate stimulatory effect on ATP synthesis, observed with 5 mM Na<sup>+</sup>, was lost when 1 mM Na<sup>+</sup> was used in the buffer solution, both in SH-SY5Y and C6 mitochondria (panel A and B, respectively). Each bar represents the mean ± SEM of data from 9 different experimental sessions. ATP data were normalized to the protein content of the different mitochondrial preparations *** p<0.001 vs all groups.</p

    Glutamate-stimulated ATP synthesis in isolated mitochondria from cells.

    No full text
    <p>(A) Effects of DL-TBOA on glutamate-stimulated ATP synthesis in mitochondria from SH-SY5Y neuroblastoma and C6 glioma cells. (B) EAAC1 expression in SH-SY5Y neuroblastoma and C6 glioma cell mitochondria. Samples enriched with anti-EAAC1 antibody by selective immunoprecipitation (IP) were also loaded onto the gel. Protein extracts from rat brain and from BHK cells stably expressing NCX1 were used as controls. In each IP lane, the lower band represents the immunoglobulin. (C) Effect of anti-EAAC1 (As-EAAC1) and anti-Citrin/AGC22 (As-AGC2) antisense (D) ODNs, on glutamate-stimulated ATP synthesis in SH-SY5Y neuroblastoma and C6 glioma cells. Data from cells treated with Lipofectamine (Ctl) and sense ODNs (S-EAAC1 and S-AGC2) are also reported. Each bar in panels A, C and D represents the mean ± SEM of 14 different determinations. * p<0.05 vs control; ** p<0.01 vs control; *** p<0.001 vs control; ## p<0.01 vs 0.5 or 1 mM glutamate; ### p<0.001 vs 0.5 or 1 mM glutamate; n.s.: not significant vs control. In ODNs experiments, *** p<0.001 vs S+glutamate.</p

    Real-time membrane potential analysis in intact cells.

    No full text
    <p>Experiments performed in SH-SY5Y (A,C) and C6 (B,D) cells using quenching concentration of the inner mitochondrial membrane potential indicator TMRE (150 nM). Glutamate perfusion induced mitochondrial depolarization (blue line). DL-TBOA (100 µM) and CGP-37157 (3 µM) both perfused from 20 min before through the end of recordings, prevented glutamate-stimulated mitochondrial depolarization (pink and yellow lines, respectively), while Ru360 (10 µM) was ineffective (green line). The resting condition inner mitochondrial membrane potential of SH-SY5Y neuroblastoma (A) or C6 glioma (B) cells was not affected by DL-TBOA (pink line), CGP-37157 (yellow line) or Ru360 (green line). The respiratory chain poison p-trifluoromethyl phenyl hydrazone (FCCP, 5 µM) was added at the end as an internal control in each experiment. For each group, more than 45 cells recorded in four different sessions were analyzed and the maximal depolarization induced after glutamate stimulation was used for the statistical analysis. *** p<0.001 vs control.</p

    Glutamate-stimulated ATP synthesis in isolated mitochondria from rat tissues.

    No full text
    <p>(A) Purity of mitochondrial preparations: western blot for the integral protein of the endoplasmic reticulum calnexin; for the plasma membrane protein β1 integrin; for the selective mitochondrial markers porin and ANT in tissue homogenate or in Percoll gradient-purified mitochondria from hippocampus and cortex. (B) ATP production by mitochondria from rat hippocampus and cortex after 1 h incubation with glutamate (black bars) or vehicle (white bars) with or without oligomycin. (C) ATP production by mitochondria from rat hippocampus and cortex after 1 h incubation with glutamate (black bars) or vehicle (white bars) or different glucose concentrations (gray bars). (D) ATP production in rat hippocampal or cortical mitochondria exposed for 1 h to DL-TBOA in the presence of glutamate (black bars) or vehicle (white bars). (E) GLAST, GLT1, and EAAC1 glutamate transporters in mitochondrial protein extracts (mt) from rat hippocampus or cortex. Plasma membrane proteins (m) were used as a positive control. The same panel shows EAAC1 immunoreactivity in different rat tissues. Rat testis were used as negative control. (F) ATP production in rat hippocampal or cortical mitochondria exposed for 1 h to TFB-TBOA 50 nM in the presence of glutamate (black bars) or vehicle (white bars). Each bar in panels B, C, D, F represents the mean ± SEM of 18 different determinations. ** p<0.01 vs control; *** p<0.001 vs control; ## p<0.01 vs 1 mM glutamate; ### p<0.001 vs 1 mM glutamate.</p

    Undifferentiated PC12 cells do express EAAC1 but not NCX1.

    No full text
    <p>(A) EAAC1 is expressed in mitochondria from undifferentiated PC12 cells. The panel shows the results of western blot (left) and PCR (right) experiments demonstrating the presence, respectively, of EAAC1 protein and transcripts in mitochondria isolated from undifferentiated PC12 cells. Significant GLAST expression and undetectable GLT1 levels were observed in similar experiments (data not shown). The experiments are representative of a set of 3. (B) NCX1 is undetectable in undifferentiated PC12 cells. Note the absence of NCX1 immunoreactivity even though the blot was overexposed in the attempt to visualize even a faint NCX1 signal (left). Moreover, no NCX1 mRNA was detected (right). Western blot experiments with NCX1 antibody were not performed on mitochondrial extracts, since we found no evidence of NCX1 expression in this cell line. In each IP lane, the lower band at around 50 KDa represents the immunoglobulin. (C,D) Both NCX2 and NCX3 are expressed in undifferentiated PC12 cells.</p

    NCX dependence of glutamate-stimulated ATP synthesis.

    No full text
    <p>(A) The NHE blocker EIPA (10 µM) was not able to affect baseline (white bars) and glutamate-stimulated (black bars) ATP synthesis in mitochondria isolated from rat hippocampus or cortex. (B) The bar graphs illustrate the glutamate-dependent Na<sup>+</sup><sub>mit</sub> response in SH-SY5Y and C6 cells in the control condition and after 20 min exposure to CGP-37157 (3 µM). Na<sup>+</sup><sub>mit</sub> response to the glutamate challenge was measured as the percent increase from resting Na<sup>+</sup><sub>mit</sub> (Δ%), i.e. from the mean Na<sup>+</sup><sub>mit</sub> recorded during the 120 s preceding the challenge to the highest Na<sup>+</sup><sub>mit</sub> value reached after glutamate stimulation. The insets report representative records of glutamate induced Na<sup>+</sup><sub>mit</sub> response obtained in SH-SY5Y and C6 cells, under control condition (pink line) and after CGP-37157 treatment (blue line). Each bar represent the mean ± SEM of 48–58 cells recorded in 3 different experimental sessions. *** p<0.001 vs control. (C) Effects of rising concentrations of the mitochondrial NCX blocker CGP-37157 on glutamate-stimulated ATP synthesis in mitochondria from rat hippocampus or cortex; similar results were obtained in mitochondria isolated from SH-SY5Y and C6 cells (D). (E) The Ca<sup>2+</sup> uniporter inhibitor Ru360 (10 µM) was not able to affect baseline (white bars) and glutamate-stimulated (black bars) ATP synthesis in mitochondria isolated from rat hippocampus or cortex. Each bar represents the mean ± SEM of 10 different determinations. * p<0.05 vs control; *** p<0.001 vs control; # p<0.05 vs 0.5 or 1 mM glutamate; ### p<0.001 vs 0.5 or 1 mM glutamate.</p

    Glutamate-induced ATP synthesis in isolated heart mitochondria is dependent on EAAC1 and NCX1.

    No full text
    <p>(A) Mitochondria isolated from rat heart express EAAC1 and NCX1. Plasma membrane (m) and mitochondrial (mt) protein extracts from rat heart were resolved with EAAC1 and NCX1 antibodies. Blots are representative of a group of 3 different experiments. (B) Coimmunoprecipitation of EAAC1 and NCX1 in rat mitochondrial protein extracts. Crude protein extracts or proteins separated by immunoprecipitation with NCX1 antibody (IP-NCX1) were resolved with EAAC1 antibody. In A and B, proteins from whole rat brain were used as a positive control. In each IP lane, the lower band at around 50 KDa represents the immunoglobulin. (C) Glutamate stimulates ATP synthesis in isolated rat heart mitochondria. The bar graphs show ATP production in presence of 1 mM glutamate (black bars) or vehicle (white bars) for 1 h in with or without oligomycin. Each bar represents the mean ± SEM of data from at least 3 different experimental sessions. (D, E) Glutamate-induced ATP synthesis in rat heart mitochondria is inhibited by EAAT or NCX pharmacological blockade with DL-TBOA or CGP-37157, respectively. The bar graphs show ATP production in presence of 1 mM glutamate (black bars) or vehicle (white bars) for 1 h with or without different concentrations of DL-TBOA (panel D) or of CGP-37157 (panel E). Each bar represents the mean ± SEM of data from 6 different experimental sessions. ATP data were normalized to the protein content of the different mitochondrial preparations. *p<0.05 vs control; *** p<0.001 vs control; # p<0.05 vs 1 mM glutamate; ### p<0.001 vs 1 mM glutamate.</p
    corecore