Clinical validation of the iXip index in avoiding unnecessary prostate biopsy: Results from a prospective multicenter study involving 426 patients

Purpose To assess the diagnostic accuracy of iXip, a novel biomarker for prostate cancer detection at initial biopsy based on an algorithm including patient age, prostate volume, PSA and PSA-IgM levels,. Materials and methods This was a prospective multicenter study involving 426 consecutive men undergoing initial prostate biopsy with at least 12 cores in a real-life clinical setting. Diagnostic accuracy of iXip for prostate cancer detection was calculated with AUC and compared to that of prostate volume, PSA and PSA-IgM levels. The correlation of iXip with tumor aggressiveness, defined as any cancer with Gleason score 657, was evaluated by Spearman \u3c1 coefficient analysis. Results Prostate cancer was diagnosed in 193/426 patients (45%), of which 65 (35%) had Gleason score 657. iXip values were significantly higher in patients with cancer than in those without cancer (median value 55% vs. 39%, p<0.001). iXip was the most accurate predictor of cancer (AUC=0.711), followed by prostate volume (AUC=0.660) and PSA level (AUC=0.543). By setting iXip cut-off at 20%, no patients with iXip values below the cut-off were diagnosed with cancer, resulting in a 5.6% (24/426) reduction of unnecessary prostate biopsies. A significant correlation between iXip values and Gleason score was observed (\u3c1=0.347; p<0.001). Conclusions Our prospective multicenter study suggests that the novel biomarker iXip may be used with a 20% cut-off value in order to reduce the proportion of prostate biopsies by approximately 5%, without missing a single case of cancer. Moreover, higher iXip values are significantly correlated with tumor aggressiveness. \ua9 2017 Elsevier Lt

Multimodal treatment for high-risk prostate cancer with high-dose intensity-modulated radiation therapy preceded or not by radical prostatectomy, concurrent intensified-dose docetaxel and long-term androgen deprivation therapy: results of a prospective phase II trial.

BACKGROUND: The optimal management of high-risk prostate cancer remains uncertain. In this study we assessed the safety and efficacy of a novel multimodal treatment paradigm for high-risk prostate cancer. METHODS: This was a prospective phase II trial including 35 patients with newly diagnosed high-risk localized or locally advanced prostate cancer treated with high-dose intensity-modulated radiation therapy preceded or not by radical prostatectomy, concurrent intensified-dose docetaxel-based chemotherapy and long-term androgen deprivation therapy. Primary endpoint was acute and late toxicity evaluated with the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 3.0. Secondary endpoint was biochemical and clinical recurrence-free survival explored with the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS: Acute gastro-intestinal and genito-urinary toxicity was grade 2 in 23% and 20% of patients, and grade 3 in 9% and 3% of patients, respectively. Acute blood/bone marrow toxicity was grade 2 in 20% of patients. No acute grade ≥ 4 toxicity was observed. Late gastro-intestinal and genito-urinary toxicity was grade 2 in 9% of patients each. No late grade ≥ 3 toxicity was observed. Median follow-up was 63 months (interquartile range 31-79). Actuarial 5-year biochemical and clinical recurrence-free survival rate was 55% (95% confidence interval, 35-75%) and 70% (95% confidence interval, 52-88%), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: In our phase II trial testing a novel multimodal treatment paradigm for high-risk prostate cancer, toxicity was acceptably low and mid-term oncological outcome was good. This treatment paradigm, thus, may warrant further evaluation in phase III randomized trials

Multimodal treatment for high-risk prostate cancer with high-dose intensity-modulated radiation therapy preceded or not by radical prostatectomy, concurrent intensified-dose docetaxel and long-term androgen deprivation therapy: results of a prospective phase II trial.

BACKGROUND The optimal management of high-risk prostate cancer remains uncertain. In this study we assessed the safety and efficacy of a novel multimodal treatment paradigm for high-risk prostate cancer. METHODS This was a prospective phase II trial including 35 patients with newly diagnosed high-risk localized or locally advanced prostate cancer treated with high-dose intensity-modulated radiation therapy preceded or not by radical prostatectomy, concurrent intensified-dose docetaxel-based chemotherapy and long-term androgen deprivation therapy. Primary endpoint was acute and late toxicity evaluated with the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 3.0. Secondary endpoint was biochemical and clinical recurrence-free survival explored with the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS Acute gastro-intestinal and genito-urinary toxicity was grade 2 in 23% and 20% of patients, and grade 3 in 9% and 3% of patients, respectively. Acute blood/bone marrow toxicity was grade 2 in 20% of patients. No acute grade ≥ 4 toxicity was observed. Late gastro-intestinal and genito-urinary toxicity was grade 2 in 9% of patients each. No late grade ≥ 3 toxicity was observed. Median follow-up was 63 months (interquartile range 31-79). Actuarial 5-year biochemical and clinical recurrence-free survival rate was 55% (95% confidence interval, 35-75%) and 70% (95% confidence interval, 52-88%), respectively. CONCLUSIONS In our phase II trial testing a novel multimodal treatment paradigm for high-risk prostate cancer, toxicity was acceptably low and mid-term oncological outcome was good. This treatment paradigm, thus, may warrant further evaluation in phase III randomized trials