137 research outputs found

    Thermal shift concentration-response curves using <i>Sj</i>GST in the absence and presence of 2 mM GSH for A) quercetin, B) myricetin and C) tannic acid.

    No full text
    <p>Thermal shifts represent the differences in T<sub>m</sub> between vehicle control and compound-containing samples, respectively.</p

    Thermal shift concentration response curves using <i>Sj</i>GST in the absence and presence of GSH for the conjugate-formers NBD-OH (A) and ethacrynic acid (EA, panel B).

    No full text
    <p>Thermal shifts represent the differences in T<sub>m</sub> between vehicle control and compound-containing samples, respectively.</p

    GST inhibitors tested in this study and their inhibitory activity against <i>Sj</i>GST.

    No full text
    <p>GST inhibitors tested in this study and their inhibitory activity against <i>Sj</i>GST.</p

    Thermal denaturation curves for <i>Sj</i>GST alone or with 100 µM S-alkyl GSH in the absence (A) and presence (B) of 2 mM GSH; (C) correlation between thermal shift at 100 µM alkyl-GSH and degree of inhibition against <i>Sj</i>GST.

    No full text
    <p>Thermal shifts, where applicable, represent the differences in T<sub>m</sub> between vehicle control and compound-containing samples, respectively.</p

    Schematic illustration of different inhibition mechanisms and the associated DSF signatures: A) GSH-competitive inhibition; B) conjugate-formation; C) ligandin-type.

    No full text
    <p>Schematic illustration of different inhibition mechanisms and the associated DSF signatures: A) GSH-competitive inhibition; B) conjugate-formation; C) ligandin-type.</p

    Thermal shift concentration-response curves for S-alkyl GSH using <i>Sj</i>GST: A) S-methyl GSH, B) S-butyl GSH, C) S-hexyl GSH, D) S-octyl GSH.

    No full text
    <p>Thermal shifts represent the differences in T<sub>m</sub> between vehicle control and compound-containing samples, respectively.</p

    Top LOPAC<sup>1280</sup> Hits.

    No full text
    1<p>Top compound concentrations of 144 or 151 µM for the AGP and HSA assays, respectively.</p

    LOPAC<sup>1280</sup> Screen.

    No full text
    <p>The robust AGP (•) and HSA (o) screen performance as represented by the reproducible high Z’-factor trend.</p
    • …
    corecore