Mechanical recanalization in ischemic anterior circulation stroke within an 8-hour time window: a real-world experience

PURPOSE:We aimed to assess the safety and effectiveness of mechanical recanalization in patients with ischemic stroke in the anterior circulation within 8 h since symptoms onset and with unknown onset time. We compared time intervals <6 h vs. 6–8 h/unknown onset time, as only limited data are available for a time window beyond 6 h.METHODS:Our cohort included 110 consecutive patients (44 males; mean age, 73.0±11.5 years) with ischemic stroke in the anterior circulation due to the acute occlusion of a large intracranial artery who underwent mechanical recanalization within an 8-hour time window or with unknown onset time. All patients underwent unenhanced computed tomography (CT) of the brain, CT angiography of the cervical and intracranial arteries and digital subtraction angiography. Perfusion CT was performed in patients beyond a 6-hour time window/with unknown onset time. We collected the following data: baseline characteristics, presence of risk factors, neurologic deficit at the time of treatment, time to therapy, recanalization rate, and 3-month clinical outcome. Successful recanalization was defined as Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction score of 2b/3 and good clinical outcome as modified Rankin scale value of 0–2 points.RESULTS:Successful recanalization was achieved in 82 patients (74.5%): in 61 patients treated within 6 h (73.5%), 7 patients treated within 6–8 h (63.6%), and 13 patients with unknown onset time (81.3%). Good 3-month clinical outcome was achieved in 61 patients (55.5%): in 46 patients treated within 6 h (55.4%), 5 patients treated within 6–8 h (45.5%), and 10 patients with unknown onset time (62.5%). Recanalization success or clinical outcome were not significantly different between patients treated at different time windows.CONCLUSION:Our data confirms the safety and effectiveness of mechanical recanalization performed in carefully selected patients with ischemic stroke in the anterior circulation within 8 h of stroke onset or with unknown onset time in everyday practice

Cerebral Infarction in Young Marijuana Smokers – Case Reports

Introduction: Causality of marijuana abuse with development of ischemic stroke has been indicated by numerous case reports and epidemiological studies. As a possible pathophysiological mechanism, the most common consideration is cardiac embolization during paroxysmal atrial fibrillation, systemic hypotension or multifocal intracerebral vasoconstriction. Case reports: We present three case reports of marijuana consumers who were admitted to our comprehensive stroke center due to ischemic stroke within 18-month period of our investigation. In one case, the cause of stroke was not related to the use of marijuana, it was a manifestation of antiphospholipid syndrome. In two cases the association with the abuse of this drug is probable but not certain. In both these cases, an isolated occlusion in vertebrobasilar arterial system was detected, without finding of a cerebral vessels stenosis. Although we did not register the atrial fibrillation, we consider cardiac embolization as probable etiological mechanism of stroke in both cases. In one case, paradoxical embolization due to the persistent foramen ovale represents another potential etiological mechanism. Conclusions: Cannabinoid use may cause ischemic stroke, especially in the younger age category. Therefore, in these patients we recommend focusing on the history of cannabinoid abuse and carry out toxicological urine tests

TIPS Creation in Patients with Persistent Left Superior Vena Cava

Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt is a minimally invasive endovascular procedure that has played an important role in the treatment of acute or repeated variceal bleeding or refractory ascites. The standard venous access route for this procedure is the right jugular vein. Sometimes it is better to use the left jugular vein because of lower probability of life threatening complication or technical failure. In this case reports the authors have described their experience with TIPS creation in two patients with persistent left and absent right superior vena cava and recommend using the left jugular vein as an access route in this rare anatomical variant