Diagnostic trap: Lithium neurotoxicity with normal lithemia.

peer reviewedWe describe here the case of a 54-year-old bipolar woman, followed in psychiatry and treated with lithium and a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (escitalopram) and lamotrigine, presenting a lithium poisoning with an altered state of consciousness caused by a supposed mismanagement of her treatment. Lithium poisoning was suggested based on neurological clinical features, but the blood test brought out a lithium concentration within the therapeutic values at 1,2 mmol/L (N: 0,6-1,2 mmol/L). The classic biological complications related to lithium poisoning (hypercalcemia, diabetes insipidus) confirmed the diagnosis. The patient has been transferred to our nephrology department where she got two hemodialysis sessions conducting to clinical and biological improvement, confirming the diagnosis of lithium poisoning despite the normal blood levels. Later, she was transferred to the psychiatry department for follow-up and for treatment adjustment

Contamination par les métaux lourds des oiseaux marins et des marsouins de la Mer du Nord = Heavy metal contamination of seabirds and porpoises in the North Sea

In the North Sea, the contamination level of Cd in porpoises, Zn and Cu in seabirds and Hg in both appear to be very high. The other studied metals (Cr, Ti, Fe, Pb) concentrations are comparable to literature. Seabirds and porpoises are located at top of the food chains, however their use as bioindicators of the contamination level of the ecosystem they are feeding on remains debatable. Actually many differences appear in both the contamination level and the storage and detoxification mechanisms from a species to another

Letter Regarding "Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Training and Well-Being of Nephrology Residents in France and Belgium".

International audienc

Serological response to mRNA SARS-CoV-2 BNT162b2 vaccine in kidney transplant recipients depends on prior exposure to SARS-CoV-2.

peer reviewedGrupper et al. have reported on a positive humoral response post full vaccination with mRNA SARS-CoV2 BNT162b2 in only 51/136 (37.5%) kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) without prior exposure to the virus(1) . We have conducted an IRB-approved (B707201215598-2021/80) prospective small sample-size study comparing the humoral response to BNT162b2 in 40 consecutive individuals early exposed to the Belgian vaccination program, including 20 KTRs with (n=10, COVID-19(+)) versus without (n=10, COVID-19(-)) history of exposure to SARS-CoV-2 and 20 controls including 10 COVID-19(+) versus 10 COVID-19(-)

The Effect of Elective Ligation of the Arteriovenous Fistula on Cardiac and Renal Functions in Kidney Transplant Recipients.

peer reviewed[en] KEY POINTS: Surgical AVF ligation in KTRs is associated with a significant increase in diastolic BP while systolic BP remains stable. AVF closure in KTRs leads to an improvement of LV and LA morphology and a decrease in serum NT-proBNP levels. There is no significant effect of AVF ligation on kidney allograft function: The eGFR remains stable over time. BACKGROUND: Kidney transplantation is considered as the best kidney replacement therapy, and arteriovenous fistula (AVF) is the preferred vascular access for hemodialysis. The systematic ligation of a functioning AVF in stable kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) remains debatable. METHODS: In this prospective study, we investigated the hemodynamic effect of the surgical closure of AVF in KTRs. Forty-three KTRs underwent an ambulatory BP monitoring before surgical closure of AVF (T0) and 12 months later (M12), as well as measurement of serum cardiac biomarkers (i.e., soluble suppression of tumorigenicity 2, N-terminal pro b-type natriuretic peptide [NT-proBNP], and galectin-3). Serum tests were also performed 6 months after AVF closure (M6). An echocardiographic examination was performed at each time point. All serum creatinine values were collected to compare the individual eGFR slopes before versus after AVF closure. The latest measure of the AVF flow before kidney transplantation was recorded. RESULTS: Diastolic BP significantly rose from T0 to M12: +4.4±7.3 mm Hg (P = 0.0003) for 24h, +3.8±7.4 mm Hg (P = 0.0018) during the day, and +6.3±9.9 mm Hg (P = 0.0002) during the night, leading to an increased proportion of KTRs with European Society of Hypertension (ESH)-defined arterial hypertension after AVF ligation. No change was observed for systolic BP. NT-proBNP significantly dropped between T0 and M6 (345 [190; 553] to 230 [118; 458] pg/ml, P = 0.0001) and then remained stable from M6 to M12 while suppression of tumorigenicity 2 and galectin-3 levels did not change from T0 to M12. We observed a significant decrease in left ventricular (LV) end-diastolic volume, LV end-systolic volume, LV mass, interventricular septum diameter, left atrial volume, and tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion from T0 to M6 and then a stability from M6 to M12. LV ejection fraction and eGFR slope remained stable during the whole study. These observations remained unchanged after adjustment for AVF flow. CONCLUSION: The closure of a patent AVF in KTRs is associated with elevation of diastolic BP, drop in serum NT-proBNP levels, reduction of left ventricular and atrial dimensions, and stability of eGFR slope

The uptake of [18F]-fluorodeoxyglucose by the renal allograft correlates with the acute Banff scores of cortex inflammation but not with the 1-year graft outcomes

peer reviewedIntroduction[18F]FDG PET/CT noninvasively disproves acute kidney allograft rejection (AR) in kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) with suspected AR. However, the correlation of biopsy-based Banff vs. PET/CT-based scores of acute inflammation remains unknown, as does the prognostic performance of [18F]FDG PET/CT at one year post suspected AR.MethodsFrom 2012 to 2019, 114 [18F]FDG-PET/CTs were prospectively performed in 105 adult KTRs who underwent per cause transplant biopsies. Ordinal logistic regression assessed the correlation between the extent of histological inflammation and the mean standardized [18F]FDG uptake values (mSUVmean). Functional outcomes of kidney allografts were evaluated at one year post per cause biopsy and correlated to mSUVmean.ResultsA significant correlation between mSUVmean and acute Banff score was found, with an adjusted R2 of 0.25. The mSUVmean was significantly different between subgroups of “total i”, with 2.30 ± 0.71 in score 3 vs. 1.68 ± 0.24 in score 0. Neither the function nor the survival of the graft at one year was statistically related to mSUVmean.Discussion[18F]FDG-PET/CT may help noninvasively assess the severity of kidney allograft inflammation in KTRs with suspected AR, but it does not predict graft outcomes at one year

Age-adapted percentiles of measured glomerular filtration in healthy individuals:extrapolation to living kidney donors over 65 years

OBJECTIVES: Most data on glomerular filtration rate (GFR) originate from subjects <65 years old, complicating decision-making in elderly living kidney donors. In this retrospective multi-center study, we calculated percentiles of measured GFR (mGFR) in donors <65 years old and extrapolated these to donors ≥65 years old. METHODS: mGFR percentiles were calculated from a development cohort of French/Belgian living kidney donors <65 years (n=1,983), using quantiles modeled as cubic splines (two linear parts joining at 40 years). Percentiles were extrapolated and validated in an internal cohort of donors ≥65 years (n=147, France) and external cohort of donors and healthy subjects ≥65 years (n=329, Germany, Sweden, Norway, France, The Netherlands) by calculating percentages within the extrapolated 5th-95th percentile (P5-P95). RESULTS: Individuals in the development cohort had a higher mGFR (99.9 ± 16.4 vs. 86.4 ± 14 and 82.7 ± 15.5 mL/min/1.73 m(2)) compared to the individuals in the validation cohorts. In the internal validation cohort, none (0%) had mGFR below the extrapolated P5, 12 (8.2%) above P95 and 135 (91.8%) between P5-P95. In the external validation cohort, five subjects had mGFR below the extrapolated P5 (1.5%), 25 above P95 (7.6%) and 299 (90.9%) between P5-P95. CONCLUSIONS: We demonstrate that extrapolation of mGFR from younger donors is possible and might aid with decision-making in elderly donors

Assessment of the Utility of Kidney Histology as a Basis for Discarding Organs in the United States: A Comparison of International Transplant Practices and Outcomes.

peer reviewedBACKGROUND: Many kidneys donated for transplant in the United States are discarded because of abnormal histology. Whether histology adds incremental value beyond usual donor attributes in assessing allograft quality is unknown. METHODS: This population-based study included patients who received a deceased donor kidney that had been biopsied before implantation according to a prespecified protocol in France and Belgium, where preimplantation biopsy findings are generally not used for decision making in the allocation process. We also studied kidneys that had been acquired from deceased United States donors for transplantation that were biopsied during allocation and discarded because of low organ quality. Using donor and recipient characteristics, we fit multivariable Cox models for death-censored graft failure and examined whether predictive accuracy (C index) improved after adding donor histology. We matched the discarded United States kidneys to similar kidneys transplanted in Europe and calculated predicted allograft survival. RESULTS: In the development cohort of 1629 kidney recipients at two French centers, adding donor histology to the model did not significantly improve prediction of long-term allograft failure. Analyses using an external validation cohort from two Belgian centers confirmed the lack of improved accuracy from adding histology. About 45% of 1103 United States kidneys discarded because of histologic findings could be accurately matched to very similar kidneys that had been transplanted in France; these discarded kidneys would be expected to have allograft survival of 93.1% at 1 year, 80.7% at 5 years, and 68.9% at 10 years. CONCLUSIONS: In this multicenter study, donor kidney histology assessment during allocation did not provide substantial incremental value in ascertaining organ quality. Many kidneys discarded on the basis of biopsy findings would likely benefit United States patients who are wait listed