Evidence for perinatal and child health care guidelines in crisis settings: can Cochrane help?

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>It is important that healthcare provided in crisis settings is based on the best available research evidence. We reviewed guidelines for child and perinatal health care in crisis situations to determine whether they were based on research evidence, whether Cochrane systematic reviews were available in the clinical areas addressed by these guidelines and whether summaries of these reviews were provided in Evidence Aid.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>Broad internet searches were undertaken to identify relevant guidelines. Guidelines were appraised using AGREE and the clinical areas that were relevant to perinatal or child health were extracted. We searched The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews to identify potentially relevant reviews. For each review we determined how many trials were included, and how many were conducted in resource-limited settings.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>Six guidelines met selection criteria. None of the included guidelines were clearly based on research evidence. 198 Cochrane reviews were potentially relevant to the guidelines. These reviews predominantly addressed nutrient supplementation, breastfeeding, malaria, maternal hypertension, premature labour and prevention of HIV transmission. Most reviews included studies from developing settings. However for large portions of the guidelines, particularly health services delivery, there were no relevant reviews. Only 18 (9.1%) reviews have summaries in Evidence Aid.</p> <p>Conclusions</p> <p>We did not identify any evidence-based guidelines for perinatal and child health care in disaster settings. We found many Cochrane reviews that could contribute to the evidence-base supporting future guidelines. However there are important issues to be addressed in terms of the relevance of the available reviews and increasing the number of reviews addressing health care delivery.</p

Prevalência e fatores associados à prematuridade entre gestantes submetidas à inibição de trabalho de parto prematuro Prevalence and risk factors associated to preterm delivery among pregnant women submitted to preterm labor inhibition treatment

OBJETIVOS: identificar a prevalência de parto prematuro em gestantes submetidas ao tratamento de inibição de trabalho de parto prematuro e analisar os fatores associados. MÉTODOS: estudo transversal, com dados coletados de 163 prontuários de gestantes submetidas a tratamento de inibição de trabalho de parto prematuro atendidas em 1995-2000, no Hospital Universitário da Universidade de São Paulo, Brasil. A variável dependente constituiu-se na ocorrência de parto prematuro e as independentes foram: idade, escolaridade, ocupação, paridade, companheiro, tabagismo, infecção urinária prévia, número de consultas pré-natal e intervalo interpartal. A análise foi feita pelo teste de associação pelo Qui-quadrado e modelos de regressão logística univariado e múltiplo. RESULTADOS: 66,3% das gestantes tiveram filhos prematuros e, em 22,7% dos casos, o parto ocorreu antes de 34 semanas. Houve associação estatística significativa entre parto prematuro e ser nulípara e apresentar número baixo de consultas pré-natal. CONCLUSÕES: atenção especial deve ser dada às gestantes nulíparas e com número reduzido de consulta pré-natal submetidas ao tratamento de inibição de trabalho de parto prematuro, com a finalidade de prevenir esse evento.<br>OBJECTIVES: to identify preterm delivery prevalence in pregnant women submitted to preterm delivery inhibition treatment and to analyze associated factors. METHODS: cross sectional study with data collected from 163 pregnant women medical files seen from 1995-2000 at the University Hospital of the University of São Paulo, Brazil. The dependent variable was preterm delivery and the independent ones were: age, education, job, parity, companion, smoking, prior urinary infection, number of prenatal medical visits and birth interval. Analysis was performed through association by the Chi-square test and univariate and multiple logistic regression models. RESULTS: 66.3% of the women had preterm deliveries and in 22.7% of the cases, delivery occurred before 34 weeks. There was a statistically significant association between preterm birth and no partner, nulliparity and a low number of prenatal visits. CONCLUSIONS: special attention should be given to nulliparous pregnant women with reduced numbers of prenatal medical visits submitted to preterm delivery inhibition treatment with the objective of preventing premature births