3 research outputs found

    The prevalence of type-specific HPV infection in women with normal cytology in the HK and GZ cohorts.

    No full text
    <p>*Statistically significant at 0.05 level of significance by Holm's procedure that accounts for the multiple comparisons.</p><p>**Adjusted for the stratified sampling design.</p>†<p>The seven commonest HPV high-risk types in the HK cohort.</p>‑<p>The seven commonest HPV high-risk types in the GZ cohort.</p

    Potential risk factors in relation to HPV infection in the HK and GZ cohorts.

    No full text
    1<p>:Tolerance >0.4 for all variables, Naglekerke R<sup>2</sup>β€Š=β€Š7.8%, Hosmer-Lemeshow test pβ€Š=β€Š0.793.</p>2<p>:Tolerance >0.4 for all variables, Naglekerke R<sup>2</sup>β€Š=β€Š3.5%, Hosmer-Lemeshow test pβ€Š=β€Š0.750.</p>3<p>:OR and P-value were obtained using multivariate logistic regression analysis model of which included all of the variables listed in this table. Bold type indicated statistically significant values.</p><p>N: Total number of cases.</p

    Comparison of the age-specific overall and high-risk HPV prevalence in five age-groups in the HK and GZ cohorts.

    No full text
    <p>(A) Overall HPV prevalence: significant difference in the overall HPV prevalence between the two cohorts in age-groups of 30–39, 40–49 and 50–59 (p<0.001, p<0.001 and pβ€Š=β€Š0.007, respectively, z test). (B) High-risk HPV prevalence: significant difference in the high-risk HPV prevalence between the two cohorts in age-groups of 30–39 and 40–49 (p<0.001 and p<0.001, respectively, z test). The error bar indicates 95% confidence interval.</p
    corecore