A long term follow-up study of the development of hip disease in Mucopolysaccharidosis type VI

Hip problems in Mucopolysaccharidosis type VI (MPS VI) lead to severe disability. Lacic of data on the course of hip disease in MPS VI make decisions regarding necessity, timing and type of surgical intervention difficult. We therefore studied the development of hip pathology in MPS VI patients over time. Data were collected as part of a prospective follow-up study. Standardized supine AP pelvis and frog leg lateral radiographs of both hips were performed yearly or every 2 years. Image assessment was performed quantitatively (angle measurements) and qualitatively (hip morphology). Clinical burden of hip disease was evaluated by physical examination, six minute walking test (6MWT) and a questionnaire assessing pain, wheelchair-dependency and walking distance. A total of 157 pelvic radiographs of 14 ERT treated MPS VI patients were evaluated. Age at first image ranged from 2.0 to 21.1 years. Median follow up duration was 6.8 years. In all patients, even in the youngest, the acetabulum and os ilium were dysplastic. Coverage of the femoral head by the acetabulum improved over time, but remained insufficient. While the femoral head appeared normal in the radiographs at young age, the ossification pattern became abnormal in all patients over time. In all patients the distance covered in the 6MWT was reduced (median Z scores -3.3). Twelve patients had a waddling gait. Four patients were partially wheelchair-dependent and ten patients had limitations in their maximum walking distance. In conclusion, clinically significant hip abnormalities develop in all MPS VI patients from very early in life, starting with deformities of the os ilium and acetabulum. Femoral head abnormalities occur later, most likely due to altered mechanical forces in combination with epiphyseal abnormalities due to glycosaminoglycan storage. The final shape and angle of the femoral head differs significantly between individual MPS VI patients and is difficult to predict. (C) 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserve

A randomized phase 3 study of tipifarnib compared with best supportive care, including hydroxyurea, in the treatment of newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia in patients 70 years or older.

International audienceThis phase 3, multicenter, open-label study evaluated the efficacy and safety of tipifarnib compared with best supportive care (BSC), including hydroxyurea, as first-line therapy in elderly patients (>or=70 years) with newly diagnosed, de novo, or secondary acute myeloid leukemia. A total of 457 patients were enrolled with 24% 80 years of age or older. Tipifarnib 600 mg orally twice a day was administered for the first 21 consecutive days, in 28-day cycles. The primary endpoint was overall survival. The median survival was 107 days for the tipifarnib arm and 109 days for the BSC arm. The hazard ratio (tipifarnib vs BSC) for overall survival was 1.02 (P value by stratified log-rank test, .843). The complete response rate for tipifarnib in this study (8%) was lower than that observed previously, but with a similar median duration of 8 months. The most frequent grade 3 or 4 adverse events were cytopenias in both arms, slightly more infections (39% vs 33%), and febrile neutropenia (16% vs 10%) seen in the tipifarnib arm. The results of this randomized study showed that tipifarnib treatment did not result in an increased survival compared with BSC, including hydroxyurea. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT00093990