9 research outputs found

    Working life, income and marital status 3 and 5 years following a breast cancer diagnosis between 1993 and 2003 and matched women without breast cancer.

    No full text
    1.<p>Working or studying at least part time. Self-employed included.</p>2.<p>Includes all women with disability pension at least part-time and/or with sickness benefit.</p>3.<p>Including women who are part time registered as unemployed or more.</p>4.<p>Social welfare allowance (own) and/or housing allowance (own).</p

    Proportion of women, with and without breast cancer, who received sickness benefit or disability pension 3 and 5 years following a diagnosis.

    No full text
    <p>Proportion of women, with and without breast cancer, who received sickness benefit or disability pension 3 and 5 years following a diagnosis.</p

    Odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) of sickness absence 3 and 5 years following a diagnosis of stage I-IIb breast cancer.

    No full text
    <p>Model 1: Adjustment for sickness absence 1 year before diagnosis, education.</p><p>Model 2: Adjustment for sickness absence 1 year before diagnosis, education, tumour size, having lymph nodes, stage, and treatment.</p><p>Model 3: Adjustment for sickness absence 1 year before diagnosis, education.</p><p>Model 4: Adjustment for sickness absence 1 year before diagnosis, education, tumour size, having lymph nodes, stage, and treatment.</p

    Hazard ratios for overall cancer risk for groups of population based on tertiles of overall mean glucose and fructosamine.

    No full text
    <p>All models were adjusted for age, sex, SES, fasting status, history of diabetes, lung and cardiovascular disease, serum albumin, total cholesterol and triglycerides. P-value for interaction was 0.77.</p

    Comparison between population with repeated measurements and single measurement of glucose and fructosamine in the AMORIS Study.

    No full text
    *<p>Standardized log glucose and fructosamine were each analyzed in the same models; adjusted for age, sex, SES, fasting status, history of diabetes, lung and cardiovascular disease, serum albumin, total cholesterol and triglycerides.</p

    Hazard ratios for the risk of different types of cancer for groups of population based on tertiles of overall mean glucose and fructosamine.

    No full text
    <p>All models were adjusted for age, SES, fasting status, history of diabetes, lung and cardiovascular disease, serum albumin, total cholesterol and triglycerides. Additional adjustment for sex was performed for colorectal and lung cancer, as well as for parity and age at first childbirth for breast cancer. P-values for interaction were 0.29, 0.93, 0.01, and 0.08 for prostate, breast, colorectal and lung cancer, respectively.</p

    Hazard ratios and confidence intervals for the risk of overall and different types of cancer for standardized log overall mean glucose and fructosamine.

    No full text
    *<p>Interaction between glucose and fructosamine in relation to cancer risk.</p>1<p>Standardized log glucose and fructosamine were each analyzed in separated models; adjusted for age.</p>2<p>Adjusted for age, sex, SES, fasting status, history of diabetes, lung and cardiovascular disease, serum albumin, total cholesterol and triglycerides.</p>3<p>Subcohort of those with BMI values (N = 2,828).</p>4<p>Subcohort of nondiabetic persons, defined as those with serum glucose level <7.0 mmol/L at all measurements and without registered hospital discharge diagnosis of diabetes mellitus prior to the date of last measurement (N = 10,743); not adjusted for history of diabetes.</p>5<p>Subcohort of fasting persons; not adjusted for fasting status (N = 5,026);</p>6<p>Stratified analysis by glucose tertiles to evaluate the interaction between glucose and fructosamine; standardized log glucose was not included in the model.</p>7<p>Sex-stratified analysis in men; not adjusted for sex.</p>8<p>Sex-stratified analysis in women; not adjusted for sex; adjusted for parity and age at first childbirth.</p
    corecore