Early improvement in severely ill patients with pneumonia treated with ceftobiprole:a retrospective analysis of two major trials

BackgroundPatients with pneumonia who are elderly or severely ill are at a particularly high risk of mortality. This post hoc retrospective analysis of data from two Phase III studies evaluated early improvement outcomes in subgroups of high-risk patients with community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) and hospital-acquired pneumonia (HAP, excluding ventilator-associated pneumonia [VAP]).MethodsOne study included hospitalised CAP patients randomised to ceftobiprole or ceftriaxone linezolid treatment. The other study included HAP patients, who were randomised to ceftobiprole or ceftazidime plus linezolid treatment. The primary outcome was rate of early clinical response (Day 3 in CAP and Day 4 in HAP patients). Additional outcome measures included clinical cure at a test-of-cure visit, 30-day all-cause mortality and safety.ResultsThe overall high-risk group comprised 398 CAP patients and 307 HAP patients with risk factors present at baseline. The rate of early response was numerically higher in ceftobiprole-treated patients vs comparator-treated patients in the following high-risk groups: CAP patients aged 75years (16.3% difference, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.8, 30.8); CAP patients with COPD (20.1% difference, 95% CI: 8.8, 31.1); all high-risk HAP patients (12.5% difference, 95% CI: 3.5, 21.4); HAP patients with >10 baseline comorbidities (15.3% difference, 95% CI: 0.3, 30.4).ConclusionsPrevious studies show that ceftobiprole is an efficacious therapy for patients with pneumonia who are at high risk of poor outcomes. This post hoc analysis provides preliminary evidence that ceftobiprole treatment may have advantages over other antibiotics in terms of achieving early improvement in high-risk patients with HAP (excluding VAP) and in some subgroups of high-risk CAP patients.Trial registration NCT00210964: registered September 21, 2005; NCT00229008: registered September 29, 2005; NCT00326287: registered May 16, 2006

In vitro activity of cefiderocol and comparators against isolates of Gram-negative pathogens from a range of infection sources: SIDERO-WT-2014–2018 studies in Italy

ABSTRACT: Objectives: : Antimicrobial resistance, particularly carbapenem resistance, in Gram-negative pathogens poses a significant healthcare threat. Carbapenem resistance rates in Italy are among the highest in Europe. We report the in vitro activity of cefiderocol, a novel siderophore cephalosporin, and comparator antibiotics against Gram-negative isolates from Italy as part of the SIDERO-WT studies. Methods: : Isolates were collected between 2014 and 2018. Minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) were determined using International Organization for Standardization and EUCAST guidelines. Antimicrobial susceptibilities were interpreted using EUCAST breakpoints; pharmacodynamic/pharmacokinetic breakpoints were used if EUCAST breakpoints were not specified. Results: : The 2472 isolates [1545 (62.5%) Enterobacterales and 927 (37.5%) non-fermenters] represented a range of infection sources, including nosocomial pneumonia (902; 36.5%), complicated urinary tract infection (374; 15.1%), bloodstream infection (596; 24.1%), complicated intra-abdominal infection (257; 10.4%) and other infection sources (343; 13.9%). Cefiderocol was active against the majority of isolates, regardless of infection source (susceptibility, 94.2−97.3%). A high proportion of non-fermenters (97.6%) and Enterobacterales (95.6%) were cefiderocol-susceptible, although susceptibility was lower in Klebsiella pneumoniae (88.1%). Susceptibility to cefiderocol was significantly (P 8 mg/L), comprising 516/927 (55.7%) non-fermenters and 96/1545 (6.2%) Enterobacterales. Cefiderocol (499/516; 96.7%) activity was greater than colistin (440/516; 85.3%), ceftazidime/avibactam (123/516; 23.8%) and ceftolozane/tazobactam (89/516; 17.2%) in meropenem-resistant non-fermenter isolates. Conclusion: : Susceptibility to cefiderocol was significantly greater than meropenem, colistin, ceftazidime/avibactam and ceftolozane/tazobactam overall, regardless of infection source

In vitro activity of cefiderocol and comparators against Gram-negative bacterial isolates from a series of surveillance studies in England: 2014-2018.

OBJECTIVES The prevalence of Gram-negative bacteria (GNB) demonstrating extensive, multiple antimicrobial resistance is increasing in England, leaving few treatment choices. Cefiderocol is a novel siderophore cephalosporin approved in Europe for the treatment of aerobic GNB infections in adults with limited treatment options. We report pooled data for a clinical isolate set collected in England between 2014-2018. METHODS MICs were determined by broth microdilution according to International Organization for Standardization guidelines. Cefiderocol susceptibility was tested using iron-depleted cation-adjusted Muller-Hinton broth. Susceptibility rates were based on EUCAST breakpoints. In the absence of a species-specific breakpoint, pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic breakpoints were used. RESULTS Of 1886 isolates from England [74.1% Enterobacterales (18.7% Escherichia coli, 17.2% Klebsiella pneumoniae), 25.9% non-fermenters (18.4% Pseudomonas aeruginosa, 3.7% Acinetobacter baumannii)], 98.7% were cefiderocol-susceptible. Cefiderocol susceptibility in Enterobacterales (99.0%) was significantly (P < 0.01) greater than ceftolozane/tazobactam (94.3%), but similar to meropenem (99.3%) and ceftazidime/avibactam (99.4%). Overall, cefiderocol susceptibility (98.0%) in non-fermenters was significantly (P < 0.01) higher than comparators (range, 84.5-92.4%). Susceptibility to cefiderocol was 98.3-99.6% by infection source and was significantly (P < 0.01) greater than comparators for isolates from patients with nosocomial pneumonia (cefiderocol, 98.3%; comparators range, 79.8-93.8%). Excluding intrinsically meropenem-resistant Stenotrophomonas maltophilia, 47/1846 isolates (2.5%) were meropenem-resistant. A high proportion of meropenem-resistant P. aeruginosa were susceptible to cefiderocol (95.0%). All S. maltophilia isolates (40/40) were cefiderocol-susceptible. CONCLUSION A substantial proportion of clinical isolates from England, representing a wide range of pathogens across multiple infection sources, was cefiderocol-susceptible. Cefiderocol retained activity against meropenem-resistant strains

In vitro activity of cefiderocol against Gram-negative bacterial pathogens in Germany

Objectives: Widespread antimicrobial resistance in Gram-negative bacteria (GNB), particularly carbapenem resistance, represents a major clinical challenge. Cefiderocol is a novel siderophore cephalosporin active against all carbapenemase classes. Methods: We evaluated the in vitro activity of cefiderocol and other antibacterial agents (ceftazidime/avibactam, ceftolozane/tazobactam, colistin and meropenem) against GNB isolates collected in Germany (2013-2018) as part of two multinational studies. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing was performed by broth microdilution. Minimum inhibitory concentrations were interpreted according to EUCAST breakpoints. Results: Cefiderocol had high activity against GNB isolates (N = 2298), encompassing both Enterobacterales (n = 1562) and non-fermenter species (n = 736), and maintained high activity against carbapenem-resistant strains (n = 211). The activity of cefiderocol against Enterobacterales was equivalent to that of ceftazidime/avibactam and colistin, while ceftolozane/tazobactam was somewhat less active. Against non-fermenter species, cefiderocol displayed equivalent activity to colistin; both of these agents were more active than ceftazidime/avibactam and ceftolozane/tazobactam. Colistin had similar activity to cefiderocol against the majority of species. These patterns of activity were echoed in carbapenemresistant isolates. The high activity of cefiderocol was independent of infection site, whereas other antibacterial agents demonstrated slightly lower activity against isolates causing pneumonia compared with those from other key infection sites. Conclusion: Cefiderocol exhibited consistently high in vitro activity against a variety of GNB isolates collected in Germany, including resistant phenotypes, across multiple infection sites. These data suggest that cefiderocol is an effective choice of antibacterial agent in patients with GNB infection, regardless of species and resistance phenotype to other agents. (C) 2021 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of International Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy

In vitro activity of cefiderocol and comparators against isolates of Gram-negative bacterial pathogens from a range of infection sources: SIDERO‑WT‑2014−2018 studies in Spain

[Objectives] The incidence of antimicrobial resistance in Europe is rising. Cefiderocol is approved in Europe for treatment of aerobic Gram-negative bacterial (GNB) infections in adults with limited treatment options. We report the in vitro activity of cefiderocol versus comparators against GNB clinical isolates from Spain.[Methods] MICs were determined by broth microdilution according to International Organization for Standardization guidelines. Cefiderocol was tested using iron-depleted cation-adjusted Mueller–Hinton broth. Susceptibility rates were based on EUCAST breakpoints; if a species-specific breakpoint was unavailable, pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic breakpoints were used.[Results] Of 2303 isolates [1502 (65.2%) Enterobacterales and 801 (34.8%) non-fermenters], 2260 (98.1%) were susceptible to cefiderocol compared with 80.8–86.9% for comparators. By infection source, susceptibility to cefiderocol ranged from 97.3% (721/741) in isolates from patients with nosocomial pneumonia to 98.9% (349/353) in bloodstream infection isolates and was greater than susceptibility to comparators (70.7–93.6% across infection sources). Overall, 368/2303 isolates (16.0%) were meropenem-resistant. A high proportion of meropenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii [169/175 (96.6%)] and Pseudomonas aeruginosa [48/50 (96.0%)] were cefiderocol-susceptible, similar to colistin [169/175 (96.6%) and 47/50 (94.0%), respectively] but higher than ceftazidime/avibactam [26/175 (14.9%) and 20/50 (40.0%), respectively] and ceftolozane/tazobactam [17/175 (9.7%) and 25/50 (50.0%), respectively]. All meropenem-resistant Stenotrophomonas maltophilia isolates [120/120 (100%)] were cefiderocol-susceptible, including one trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole-resistant isolate, with fewer susceptible to colistin [86/120 (71.7%)], ceftazidime/avibactam [42/120 (35.0%)] and ceftolozane/tazobactam [35/120 (29.2%)].[Conclusion] A high proportion of clinical isolates from Spain, representing a wide range of pathogens across multiple infection sources, were susceptible to cefiderocol. Cefiderocol retained activity against meropenem-resistant isolates.This work was supported by Shionogi & Co., Ltd. (Osaka, Japan).Peer reviewe

Study of the glucoamylase promoter in Aspergillus niger using green fluorescence protein

An Aspergillus niger strain expressing a red-shifted green fluorescent protein (GFP) in the cytoplasm under the control of the glucoamylase promoter (PglaA) was characterized with respect to its physiology and morphology. Although xylose acted as a repressor carbon source during batch cultivations, PglaA-driven GFP expression by the glucoamylase promoter could be demonstrated in xylose-limited continuous cultures. In these cultivations, the xylose concentration was therefore too low to cause repression. Transient experiments initiated with a maltose pulse did not further induce red-shifted GFP production in xylose-limited continuous cultures. Maltose induction under conditions of xylose repression was microscopically observed and quantified in a flow-through chamber. Red-shifted GFP was first produced after 5 h induction. Finally the strain was characterized in glucose-limited continuous cultures, and here the area of the mycelium stained with cytoplasmic GFP increased with increasing specific growth rate, indicating that GFP can be used as a marker of cellular activity in this type of cultivation

In vitro activity of cefiderocol against European Enterobacterales, including isolates resistant to meropenem and recentβ-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combinations

ABSTRACT Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales represent a major health threat and have few approved therapeutic options. Enterobacterales isolates were collected from hospitalized inpatients from 49 sites in six European countries (1 January–31 December 2020) and underwent susceptibility testing to cefiderocol and β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combinations. Meropenem-resistant (MIC >8 mg/L) and cefiderocol-susceptible isolates were analyzed by PCR, and cefiderocol-‍resistant isolates by whole-genome sequencing, to identify resistance mechanisms. Overall, 1,909 isolates (including 970 Klebsiella spp., 382 Escherichia coli, and 244 Enterobacter spp.) were collected, commonly from bloodstream infections (43.6%). Cefiderocol susceptibility was higher than approved β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combinations and largely comparable to cefepime-taniborbactam and aztreonam-avibactam against all Enterobacterales (98.1% vs 78.1%–‍97.4% and 98.7%–99.1%, respectively) and Enterobacterales resistant to meropenem (n = 148, including 125 Klebsiella spp.; 87.8% vs 0%–71.6% and 93.2%–98.6%, respectively), β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combinations (66.7%–‍92.1% vs 0%–‍88.1% and 66.7%–97.9%, respectively), and to both meropenem and β-‌lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combinations (61.9%–65.9% vs 0%–‍20.5% and 76.2%–97.7%, respectively). Susceptibilities to approved and developmental β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combinations against cefiderocol-resistant Enterobacterales (n = 37) were 10.8%–‍56.8% and 78.4%–94.6%, respectively. Most meropenem-resistant Enterobacterales harbored Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase (110/148) genes, although metallo-β-lactamase (35/148) and oxacillinase (OXA) carbapenemase (6/148) genes were less common; cefiderocol susceptibility was retained in β-lactamase producers, other than NDM, AmpC, and non-carbapenemase OXA producers. Most cefiderocol-resistant Enterobacterales had multiple resistance mechanisms, including ≥1 iron uptake-related mutation (37/37), carbapenemase gene (33/37), and ftsI mutation (24/37). The susceptibility to cefiderocol was higher than approved β-lac‌tam/β-lactamase inhibitor combinations against European Enterobacterales, including meropenem- and β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combination-resistant isolates.IMPORTANCEThis study collected a notably large number of Enterobacterales isolates from Europe, including meropenem- and β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combination-resistant isolates against which the in vitro activities of cefiderocol and developmental β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combinations were directly compared for the first time. The MIC breakpoint for high-dose meropenem was used to define meropenem resistance, so isolates that would remain meropenem resistant with doses clinically available to patients were included in the data. Susceptibility to cefiderocol, as a single active compound, was high against Enterobacterales and was higher than or comparable to available β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combinations. These results provide insights into the treatment options for infections due to Enterobacterales with resistant phenotypes. Early susceptibility testing of cefiderocol in parallel with β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combinations will allow patients to receive the most appropriate treatment option(s) available in a timely manner. This is particularly important when options are more limited, such as against metallo-β-lactamase-producing Enterobacterales

Evaluation of the activity of cefepime/enmetazobactam against Enterobacterales bacteria collected in Europe from 2019 to 2021, including third-generation cephalosporin-resistant isolates

ABSTRACT: Objectives: This study was performed to investigate the activity of the novel ß-lactam/ß-lactamase inhibitor combination cefepime/enmetazobactam, against recently circulating Enterobacterales isolates from Europe from 2019 to 2021. Methods: A total of 2627 isolates were collected, and antimicrobial susceptibility was determined according to the European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing guidelines. Isolates with phenotypic resistance to ceftriaxone and ceftazidime (but susceptible to meropenem) and isolates nonsusceptible to meropenem were screened for the presence of ß-lactamases. Results: Overall, susceptibility to third-generation cephalosporins was 77%, and 97.3% were susceptible to meropenem. Cefepime/enmetazobactam susceptibility was 97.9% (72% of these isolates were Klebsiella pneumoniae from Italy), compared with 80.0% susceptibility to piperacillin/tazobactam and 99.4% to ceftazidime/avibactam. A total of 320 isolates (12.2%) were resistant to third-generation cephalosporins but susceptible to meropenem, and virtually all (96.3%) carried an extended-spectrum ß-lactamase with or without an AmpC and these were all susceptible to cefepime/enmetazobactam. Most meropenem-nonsusceptible isolates carried a KPC (68%), which were not inhibited by cefepime/enmetazobactam but were inhibited by ceftazidime/avibactam. Additionally, most meropenem-nonsusceptible isolates carrying OXA-48 (9/12 isolates) were susceptible to cefepime/enmetazobactam. Conclusions: Cefepime/enmetazobactam was highly active against Enterobacterales isolates, especially those resistant to third-generation cephalosporins. These data suggest that cefepime/enmetazobactam could be used as a carbapenem-sparing agent to replace piperacillin/tazobactam