Urbanization and Socioeconomic Disparities in Hypertension among Older Adult Women in Sudan

Background: Evidence from the developed world associates higher prevalence of hypertension with lower socioeconomic status (SES). However, patterns of association are not as clear in Africa and other developing countries, with varying levels of socioeconomic development and epidemiological transition. Using wealth and education as indicators, we investigated association between SES and hypertension among older adult women in Sudan and examined whether urbanicity mediates the relationship. Methods: The sample included women aged 50 years and over participating in the nationally representative population-based second Sudan Health Household Survey (SHHS) conducted in 2010. Principal components analysis was used to assign each household with a wealth score based on assets owned. The score was categorized into quintiles from lowest (poorest) to highest (richest). Findings: The sample included a total of 5218 women, median and mean age 55 and 59 years, respectively, with the majority not have any schooling (81.6%). The overall prevalence of reported hypertension was found to be 10.5%. After adjustment for age, marital status, work status and urban/rural location, better wealth and higher education were independently and positively associated with hypertension prevalence rates. However, when stratified by urbanicity, the relationship between wealth and hypertension lost its significance for women in urban areas but maintained it in rural areas, increasing significantly and consistently with each increase in quintile index (adjusted odds ratio, aOR1 = 1.95 95% CI = 1.08–3.52; aOR2 = 5.25, 95% CI = 3.01–9.15; aOR3 = 8.27, 95% CI = 4.78–14.3; and aOR4 = and 11.4, 95% CI = 6.45–20.0; respectively). By contrast, education played a greater role in increasing the odds of hypertension among women in urban locations but not in rural locations (aOR = 2.14, 95% CI = 1.25–7.90 vs. aOR = 0.79, 95% CI = 0.27–2.30, respectively). Conclusions: Our findings of a socioeconomic gradient in the prevalence of hypertension among women, mediated by urbanization, call for targeted interventions from early stages of economic development in Sudan and similar settings of transitioning countries

Comprehensive Cleft Care Delivery in Developing Countries: Impact of Geographic and Demographic Factors

INTRODUCTION: The authors analyzed the insights of participants and faculty members of Global Smile Foundation's Comprehensive Cleft Care Workshops concerning the barriers and interventions to multidisciplinary cleft care delivery, after stratification based on demographic and geographic factors. METHODS: During 2 simulation-based Comprehensive Cleft Care Workshops organized by Global Smile Foundation, participants and faculty members filled a survey. Surveys included demographic and geographic data and investigated the most relevant barrier to multidisciplinary cleft care and the most significant intervention to deliver comprehensive cleft care in outreach settings, as perceived by participants. RESULTS: The total response rate was 57.8%. Respondents reported that the greatest barrier to comprehensive cleft care was financial, and the most relevant intervention to deliver multidisciplinary cleft care was building multidisciplinary teams. Stratification by age, gender, and geographical area showed no statistical difference in reporting that the greatest barrier to cleft care was financial. However, lack of multidisciplinary teams was the most important barrier according to respondents with less than 5 years of experience (P = 0.03). Stratification by gender, years in practice, specialty, and geographical area showed no statistical difference, with building multidisciplinary teams reported as the most significant intervention. However, increased training was reported as the main intervention to cleft care for those aged less than 30 years old (P = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS: Our study delivers an assessment for barriers facing multidisciplinary cleft care delivery and interventions required to improve cleft care delivery. The authors are hoping that stratification by demographic and geographic factors will help them delineate community-specific road maps to refine cleft care delivery

The First Hybrid International Educational Comprehensive Cleft Care Workshop.

OBJECTIVE Describe the first hybrid global simulation-based comprehensive cleft care workshop, evaluate impact on participants, and compare experiences based on in-person versus virtual attendance. DESIGN Cross-sectional survey-based evaluation. SETTING International comprehensive cleft care workshop. PARTICIPANTS Total of 489 participants. INTERVENTIONS Three-day simulation-based hybrid comprehensive cleft care workshop. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Participant demographic data, perceived barriers and interventions needed for global comprehensive cleft care delivery, participant workshop satisfaction, and perceived short-term impact on practice stratified by in-person versus virtual attendance. RESULTS The workshop included 489 participants from 5 continents. The response rate was 39.9%. Participants perceived financial factors (30.3%) the most significant barrier and improvement in training (39.8%) as the most important intervention to overcome barriers facing cleft care delivery in low to middle-income countries. All participants reported a high level of satisfaction with the workshop and a strong positive perceived short-term impact on their practice. Importantly, while this was true for both in-person and virtual attendees, in-person attendees reported a significantly higher satisfaction with the workshop (28.63 ± 3.08 vs 27.63 ± 3.93; P = .04) and perceived impact on their clinical practice (22.37 ± 3.42 vs 21.02 ± 3.45 P = .01). CONCLUSION Hybrid simulation-based educational comprehensive cleft care workshops are overall well received by participants and have a positive perceived impact on their clinical practices. In-person attendance is associated with significantly higher satisfaction and perceived impact on practice. Considering that financial and health constraints may limit live meeting attendance, future efforts will focus on making in-person and virtual attendance more comparable