9 research outputs found

    Na,K-ATPase Acts as a Beta-Amyloid Receptor Triggering Src Kinase Activation

    Full text link
    Beta-amyloid (Aβ) has a dual role, both as an important factor in the pathology of Alzheimer’s disease and as a regulator in brain physiology. The inhibitory effect of Aβ42 oligomers on Na,K-ATPase contributes to neuronal dysfunction in Alzheimer’s disease. Still, the physiological role of the monomeric form of Aβ42 interaction with Na,K-ATPase remains unclear. We report that Na,K-ATPase serves as a receptor for Aβ42 monomer, triggering Src kinase activation. The co-localization of Aβ42 with α1- and β1-subunits of Na,K-ATPase, and Na,K-ATPase with Src kinase in SH-SY5Y neuroblastoma cells, was observed. Treatment of cells with 100 nM Aβ42 causes Src kinase activation, but does not alter Na,K-ATPase transport activity. The interaction of Aβ42 with α1β1 Na,K-ATPase isozyme leads to activation of Src kinase associated with the enzyme. Notably, prevention of Na,K-ATPase:Src kinase interaction by a specific inhibitor pNaKtide disrupts the Aβ-induced Src kinase activation. Stimulatory effect of Aβ42 on Src kinase was lost under hypoxic conditions, which was similar to the effect of specific Na,K-ATPase ligands, the cardiotonic steroids. Our findings identify Na,K-ATPase as a Aβ42 receptor, thus opening a prospect on exploring the physiological and pathological Src kinase activation caused by Aβ42 in the nervous system

    Zinc Induced Aβ16 Aggregation Modeled by Molecular Dynamics

    No full text
    It is widely accepted that the addition of zinc leads to the formation of neurotoxic nonfibrillar aggregates of beta-amyloid peptides Aβ40 and Aβ42 and at the same time destabilizes amyloid fibrils. However, the mechanism of the effect of zinc on beta-amyloid is not fully understood. In this study, a fast zinc-induced aggregation of Aβ16 (as compared to a system without zinc) via the formation of Aβ16 dimers with one zinc ion coordinated in the metal-binding site 11EVHH14, followed by their polymerization, has been studied by molecular dynamics. The best aggregation was shown by the system composed of Aβ16 dimers bound by one zinc ion, with no additional zinc in solution. The presence of Aβ16 dimers was a major condition, sufficient for fast aggregation into larger complexes. It has been shown that the addition of zinc to a system with already formed dimers does not substantially affect the characteristics and rate of aggregation. At the same time, an excessive concentration of zinc at the early stages of the formation of conglomerates can negatively affect aggregation, since in systems where zinc ions occupied the 11EVHH14 coordination center and the His6 residue of every Aβ16 monomer, the aggregation proceeded more slowly and the resulting complexes were not as large as in the zinc-free Aβ system. Thus, this study has shown that the formation of Aβ16 dimers bound through zinc ions at the 11EVHH14 sites of the peptides plays an important role in the formation of neurotoxic non-fibrillar aggregates of beta-amyloid peptide Aβ16. The best energetically favorable structure has been obtained for the complex of two Aβ16 dimers with two zinc ions

    Structure Comparison of Beta Amyloid Peptide Aβ 1–42 Isoforms. Molecular Dynamics Modeling

    No full text
    Beta amyloid peptide Aβ 1–42 (Aβ42) has a unique dual role in the human organism, as both the peptide with an important physiological function and one of the most toxic biological compounds provoking Alzheimer’s disease (AD). There are several known Aβ42 isoforms that we discuss here that are highly neurotoxic and lead to the early onset of AD. Aβ42 is an intrinsically disordered protein with no experimentally solved structure under physiological conditions. The objective of this research was to establish the appropriate molecular dynamics (MD) methodology and model a uniform set of structures for the Aβ42 isoforms that form the core of this study. For that purpose, force field selection and verification including convergence testing for MD simulations was made. Replica exchange MD and conventional MD modeling of several Aβ42 and Aβ16 isoforms that have neurotoxic and amyloidogenic effects impacting the severity of Alzheimer’s disease were carried out with the optimal force field and solvent parameters. A standardized ensemble of structures for the Aβ42 and Aβ16 isoforms covering 30–50% of the conformational ensembles extracted from the free energy minima was calculated from MD trajectories. The resulting data set of modeled structures includes Aβ42 wild type, isoD7, pS8, D7H, and H6R-Aβ42 and Aβ16 wild type, isoD7, pS8, D7H, and H6R-Aβ16. The representative structures are given in the Supporting Information; they are open for public access. In the study, we also evaluated the differences between the structures of Aβ42 isoforms and speculate on their possible relevance to the known functions. Utilizing several representative structures for a single disordered protein for docking, with their subsequent averaging by conformations, would markedly increase the reliability of docking results

    Docking and Molecular Dynamics-Based Identification of Interaction between Various Beta-Amyloid Isoforms and RAGE Receptor

    No full text
    Beta-amyloid peptide (Aβ) is a ligand associated with RAGE (Advanced glycosylation end product-specific receptor). Aβ is translocated in complexes with RAGE from the blood to brain across the blood–brain barrier (BBB) by transcytosis. Aβ and its isoforms are important factors in the Alzheimer’s disease (AD) pathogenesis. However, interaction with RAGE was previously studied for Aβ but not for its isoforms. The present study has been directed at identifying the key interaction interfaces between RAGE and Aβ isoforms (Aβ40, Aβ42, phosphorylated and isomerized isoforms pS8-Aβ42, isoD7-Aβ42). Two interfaces have been identified by docking: they are represented by an extended area at the junction of RAGE domains V and C1 and a smaller area linking C1 and C2 domains. Molecular dynamics (MD) simulations have shown that all Aβ isoforms form stable and tightly bound complexes. This indicates that all Aβ isoforms potentially can be transported through the cell as part of a complex with RAGE. Modeling of RAGE interaction interfaces with Aβ indicates which chemical compounds can potentially be capable of blocking this interaction, and impair the associated pathogenic cascades. The ability of three RAGE inhibitors (RAP, FPS-ZM1 and RP-1) to disrupt the RAGE:Aβ interaction has been probed by docking and subsequently the complexes’ stability verified by MD. The RP-1 and Aβ interaction areas coincide and therefore this inhibitor is very promising for the RAGE:Aβ interaction inhibition

    Interaction Interface of Aβ<sub>42</sub> with Human Na,K-ATPase Studied by MD and ITC and Inhibitor Screening by MD

    No full text
    Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is a neurodegenerative disease accompanied by progressive cognitive and memory dysfunction due to disruption of normal electrotonic properties of neurons and neuronal loss. The Na,K-ATPase interaction with beta amyloid (Aβ) plays an important role in AD pathogenesis. It has been shown that Na,K-ATPase activity in the AD brain was significantly lower than those in age-matched control brain. The interaction of Aβ42 with Na,K-ATPase and subsequent oligomerization leads to inhibition of the enzyme activity. In this study interaction interfaces between three common Aβ42 isoforms, and different conformations of human Na,K-ATPase (α1β1) have been obtained using molecular modeling, including docking and molecular dynamics (MD). Interaction sites of Na,K-ATPase with Aβ42 are localized between extracellular parts of α- and β- subunits and are practically identical for Na,K-ATPase at different conformations. Thermodynamic parameters for the formation of Na,K-ATPase:Aβ42 complex at different conformations acquired by isothermal titration calorimetry (ITC) are similar, which is in line with the data of molecular modeling. Similarity of Na,K-ATPase interaction interfaces with Aβ in all conformations allowed us to cross-screen potential inhibitors for this interaction and find pharmaceutical compounds that could block it

    Na,K-ATPase Acts as a Beta-Amyloid Receptor Triggering Src Kinase Activation

    No full text
    Beta-amyloid (A&beta;) has a dual role, both as an important factor in the pathology of Alzheimer&rsquo;s disease and as a regulator in brain physiology. The inhibitory effect of A&beta;42 oligomers on Na,K-ATPase contributes to neuronal dysfunction in Alzheimer&rsquo;s disease. Still, the physiological role of the monomeric form of A&beta;42 interaction with Na,K-ATPase remains unclear. We report that Na,K-ATPase serves as a receptor for A&beta;42 monomer, triggering Src kinase activation. The co-localization of A&beta;42 with &alpha;1- and &beta;1-subunits of Na,K-ATPase, and Na,K-ATPase with Src kinase in SH-SY5Y neuroblastoma cells, was observed. Treatment of cells with 100 nM A&beta;42 causes Src kinase activation, but does not alter Na,K-ATPase transport activity. The interaction of A&beta;42 with &alpha;1&beta;1 Na,K-ATPase isozyme leads to activation of Src kinase associated with the enzyme. Notably, prevention of Na,K-ATPase:Src kinase interaction by a specific inhibitor pNaKtide disrupts the A&beta;-induced Src kinase activation. Stimulatory effect of A&beta;42 on Src kinase was lost under hypoxic conditions, which was similar to the effect of specific Na,K-ATPase ligands, the cardiotonic steroids. Our findings identify Na,K-ATPase as a A&beta;42 receptor, thus opening a prospect on exploring the physiological and pathological Src kinase activation caused by A&beta;42 in the nervous system

    Tetrapeptide Ac-HAEE-NH2 Protects α4β2 nAChR from Inhibition by Aβ

    No full text
    The cholinergic deficit in Alzheimer&rsquo;s disease (AD) may arise from selective loss of cholinergic neurons caused by the binding of A&beta; peptide to nicotinic acetylcholine receptors (nAChRs). Thus, compounds preventing such an interaction are needed to address the cholinergic dysfunction. Recent findings suggest that the 11EVHH14 site in A&beta; peptide mediates its interaction with &alpha;4&beta;2 nAChR. This site contains several charged amino acid residues, hence we hypothesized that the formation of A&beta;-&alpha;4&beta;2 nAChR complex is based on the interaction of 11EVHH14 with its charge-complementary counterpart in &alpha;4&beta;2 nAChR. Indeed, we discovered a 35HAEE38 site in &alpha;4&beta;2 nAChR, which is charge-complementary to 11EVHH14, and molecular modeling showed that a stable A&beta;42-&alpha;4&beta;2 nAChR complex could be formed via the 11EVHH14:35HAEE38 interface. Using surface plasmon resonance and bioinformatics approaches, we further showed that a corresponding tetrapeptide Ac-HAEE-NH2 can bind to A&beta; via 11EVHH14 site. Finally, using two-electrode voltage clamp in Xenopus laevis oocytes, we showed that Ac-HAEE-NH2 tetrapeptide completely abolishes the A&beta;42-induced inhibition of &alpha;4&beta;2 nAChR. Thus, we suggest that 35HAEE38 is a potential binding site for A&beta; on &alpha;4&beta;2 nAChR and Ac-HAEE-NH2 tetrapeptide corresponding to this site is a potential therapeutic for the treatment of &alpha;4&beta;2 nAChR-dependent cholinergic dysfunction in AD
    corecore