SBRT for lung oligometastases: Who is the perfect candidate?

AimTo analyze the literature data about lung oligometastatic patients who underwent SBRT with regard to doses, fractionation, outcomes, response assessment and prognostic factors, trying to define “the right patient” for the local treatment.Background“Oligometastatic disease” is defined as a state in which metastases are limited in number and site and characterized by unusual cancer biology and behavior. In this setting local therapy could have a potential curative role. Recently, technological advances in Radiation Oncology permitted the introduction of Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy (SBRT), a novel treatment modality that delivers ablative dose of radiation to the extra-cranial sites with high precision using single or a small number of fractions.Materials and methodsWe performed a literature search using Medical Subject Heading terms “stereotactic body radiation therapy” and “lung metastases”, considering a period of 10 years.ResultsMany non-randomized studies have shown that SBRT for lung oligometastases is safe and effective, with local control rates of about 80%. To date SBRT represents an alternative and competitive option in patients with lung oligometastatic disease who refuse surgical treatment or unsuitable for surgery. Based on published studies, SBRT might have major benefit for a patient with breast histology, disease-free interval ≥12 months, control of the primary tumor, small lesions, limited number of lesions and higher radiation dose delivered.ConclusionsWell-designed collaborative trials are necessary to draw final conclusions. To date, the discussion within a multidisciplinary team becomes crucial to perform a careful patients’ selection in the setting of oligometastatic disease

Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy Boost in Patients With Cervical Cancer Ineligible for Brachytherapy

Background: Standard treatment for locally advanced cervical cancer is external beam radiotherapy followed by brachytherapy (BT). Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) is a possible option for treating patients ineligible for BT. Patients and methods: From October 2012 to July 2020, nine women with cervical cancer received SBRT to high-risk volumes. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate the rates of overall and disease-free survival. Results: The median age was 52 years; 88% of patients had squamous carcinoma. Reasons for forgoing BT were cervical canal stenosis, treatment refusal and hematological disease. The median boost dose was 18 Gy and the median dose per fraction was 6 Gy. Median follow-up was 16 months. The median survival was 24 months, the actuarial 2-year OS rate was 70%, and median disease-free survival was 11 months. One grade 3 late vaginal toxicity was reported. No acute nor late grade 4 toxicities were observed. Conclusion: SBRT boost in patients with cervical cancer ineligible for BT led to acceptable survival outcomes and a safe toxicity profile

Multimodality therapy approaches, local and systemic treatment, compared with chemotherapy alone in recurrent glioblastoma

BACKGROUND: Long-term local control in Glioblastoma is rarely achieved and nearly all patients relapse. In this study we evaluated the clinical effect of different treatment approaches in recurrent patients. METHODS: Forty-three patients, with median age of 51 years were evaluated for salvage treatment: re-resection and/or re-irradiation plus chemotherapy or chemotherapy alone. Response was recorded using the Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology criteria. Hematologic and non-hematologic toxicities were graded according to Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events 4.0. Twenty-one patients underwent chemotherapy combined with local treatment, surgery and/or radiation therapy, and 22 underwent chemotherapy only. RESULTS: The median follow up was 7 months (range 3–28 months). The 1 and 2-years Progression Free Survival was 65 and 10 % for combined treatment and 22 and 0 % for chemotherapy alone (p < 0.01). The 1 and 2-years overall survival was 69 and 29 % for combined and 26 and 0 % for chemotherapy alone (p < 0.01). No toxicity greater than grade 2 was recorded. CONCLUSION: These data showed that in glioblastoma recurrence the combination of several approaches in a limited group of patients is more effective than a single treatment alone. This stress the importance of multimodality treatment whenever clinically feasible

Diagnostic and Therapeutic Management of Primary Orbital Neuroendocrine Tumors (NETs): Systematic Literature Review and Clinical Case Presentation

Background: The ocular involvement of neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) is uncommon and mainly represented by metastases from gastrointestinal and lung neuroendocrine tumors. Primary orbital NENs are even less common and their diagnostic and therapeutic management is a challenge. Methods: A systematic review of the literature was conducted from 1966 to September 2023 on PubMed to identify articles on orbital NENs and to summarize their clinical–pathological features, diagnosis and therapeutic management. Furthermore, we presented a case of a locally advanced retro-orbital primary neuroendocrine tumor that was referred to the certified Center of Excellence of Sant’Andrea Hospital, La Sapienza University of Rome, Italy. Results: The final analysis included 63 records on orbital NENs and 11 records focused on primary orbital NENs. The localization was mostly unilateral and in the right orbit; proptosis or exophthalmos represented the initial symptoms. The diagnostic work-up and therapeutic management was discussed and a diagnostic algorithm for the suspicion of primary orbital NENs was proposed. Conclusions: A multidisciplinary approach is required for the management of primary orbital NENs, emphasizing the importance of early referral to dedicated centers for prompt differential diagnosis, tailored treatment, and an improved quality of life and survival

Hypofractionated Radiation Therapy (HFRT) of Breast/Chest Wall and Regional Nodes in Locally Advanced Breast Cancer. Toxicity Profile and Survival Outcomes in Retrospective Monoistitutional Study

Aim of the study was to evaluate hypofractionated radiation therapy (HFRT) of the breast/chest wall and regional nodes in patients with locally advanced breast cancer. One hundred and twenty-two patients were treated with HFRT (42.4Gy/16fractions). HFRT showed excellent local control, survival rates and low toxicity profile and may be considered a valid therapeutic option for these patients. AIM: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of hypofractionated radiation therapy (HFRT) of the breast/chest wall and regional nodes in patients with locally advanced breast cancer and positive lymph nodes. Materials and Methods: One hundred and t wenty-t wo patients treated between October 2016 and March 2020 with HFRT were retrospectively reviewed. A total dose of 42.4 Gy was delivered to the chest wall and lymph nodes in 16 fractions of 2.65 Gy each, using the IMRT technique. Patients treated with breast-conserving surgery received an overdose (concomitant boost of 3 Gy daily) with the SIB (Simultaneous Integrated Boost) technique. Results: Median age at diagnosis was 58 years (range 34-86 years) and median follow-up was 22 months (range 6-48 months). Overall survival (OS) at 1, 2 and 3 years was 100%, 97.3% and 90%, respectively. Disease-free survival (DFS) at 1, 2, and 3 years was 91.4%, 87%, and 84.8%, respectively. Distant metastasis-free survival (MFS) at 1, 2 and 3 years was 93.1%, 88% and 85.7%, respectively. Two patients (1.6%) experienced local recurrence on the chest wall during FUP. Twenty-one patients (17%) showed a grade 2 dermal toxicity, no grade 3 acute skin toxicity was found. Sixteen patients (13%) showed early-stage arm lymphedema (grade ≤2). Twenty-three patients (19%) showed a grade 2 late skin toxicit y. Twent y patients (16%) had grade ≤2 late arm lymphedema. Conclusion: Given the excellent local control, survival rates and the low toxicity profile demonstrated, HFRT could be considered a valid therapeutic option in patients with locally advanced breast cancer

Outcome Evaluation of Oligometastatic Patients Treated with Surgical Resection Followed by Hypofractionated Stereotactic Radiosurgery (HSRS) on the Tumor Bed, for Single, Large Brain Metastases.

The aim of this study was to evaluate the benefit of a combined treatment, surgery followed by adjuvant hypofractionated stereotactic radiosurgery (HSRS) on the tumor bed, in oligometastatic patients with single, large brain metastasis (BM).Fom January 2011 to March 2015, 69 patients underwent complete surgical resection followed by HSRS with a total dose of 30Gy in 3 daily fractions. Clinical outcome was evaluated by neurological examination and MRI 2 months after radiotherapy and then every 3 months. Local progression was defined as radiographic increase of the enhancing abnormality in the irradiated volume, and brain distant progression as the presence of new brain metastases or leptomeningeal enhancement outside the irradiated volume. Surgical morbidity and radiation-therapy toxicity, local control (LC), brain distant progression (BDP), and overall survival (OS) were evaluated.The median preoperative volume and maximum diameter of BM was 18.5cm3 (range 4.1-64.2cm3) and 3.6cm (range 2.1-5-4cm); the median CTV was 29.0cm3 (range 4.1-203.1cm3) and median PTV was 55.2cm3 (range 17.2-282.9cm3). The median follow-up time was 24 months (range 4-33 months). The 1-and 2-year LC in site of treatment was 100%; the median, 1-and 2-year BDP was 11.9 months, 19.6% and 33.0%; the median, 1-and 2-year OS was 24 months (range 4-33 months), 91.3% and 73.0%. No severe postoperative morbidity or radiation therapy toxicity occurred in our series.Multimodal approach, surgery followed by HSRS, can be an effective treatment option for selected patients with single, large brain metastases from different solid tumors