18 research outputs found

    Dedalo: Phase II Study of Daratumumab Plus Pomalidomide and Dexamethasone (DPd) in Patients with Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma and 17p Deletion

    No full text
    Deletion of the short arm of chromosome 17 (del(17p)) is a well-established high-risk feature in multiple myeloma (MM) and is included in current disease staging criteria. Treatment of del(17p) MM is a major challenge, since the disease is characterized by rapid development of chemoresistance and short survival. The size of the del(17p) clone correlates with prognosis, and the threshold value of 55% to 60% has the worst prognosis. Approximately a third of patients (pts) have a concomitant TP53 mutation, with a complete abolition of the protein function. TP53 biallelic inactivation is defined as double-hit myelom

    Lenalidomide-based triplet regimens in first relapsed multiple myeloma patients: real-world evidence from a propensity score matched analysis

    No full text
    : Lenalidomide and dexamethasone (Rd)-based triplets, in particular carfilzomib-Rd (KRd) and daratumumab-Rd (DaraRd), represent a standard of care in lenalidomide-sensitive multiple myeloma (MM) patients in first relapse. Meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials (RCT), suggested better outcome with DaraRd. Trying to address this issue in clinical practice, we collected data of 430 consecutive MM patients addressed to Rd-based triplets in first relapse between January 2017 and March 2021. Overall, the most common used regimen was DaraRd, chosen in almost half of the cases (54.4%), followed by KRd (34.6%). Different triplets were used much less commonly. In an attempt to limit the imbalance of a retrospective analysis, we conducted a propensity score matching (PSM) comparison between DaraRd and KRd. After PSM, efficacy of DaraRd versus KRd was similar in terms of overall-response rate (ORR) (OR: 0.9, P=0.685) as well as of very good partial response (VGPR) or better (OR: 0.9, P=0.582). The median progression-free survival (PFS) was significantly longer for DaraRd (29.8 vs. 22.5 months; P=0.028). DaraRd was tolerated better, registering a lower rate of grade 3-4 non-hematological toxicity (OR: 0.4, P<0.001). With the limitations of any retrospective analysis, our real-life PSM comparison between DaraRd and KRd, in first-relapse MM patients, showed better tolerability and prolonged PFS of DaraRd, although with some gaps of performance, in particular of DaraRd, with respect to RCT. Carfilzomib-containing regimens, like KRd, still remain a valid second-line option in the emerging scenario of first-line daratumumab-based therapy
    corecore