The Religion Clauses and Parental Health Care Decisionmaking for Children: Suggestions for a New Approach

This Article argues that statutory exemptions in child abuse and neglect laws that exclude from their definitions of medical neglect a parent\u27s choice to rely upon spiritual rather than physical healing are unconstitutional. In attempting to respect the free exercise rights of parents, these laws violate the free exercise rights of affected children, who are too young to make religious choices for themselves. Forcing parents\u27 religious choices on their children is also an Establishment Clause violation, as the state is taking sides in religious choice-to the detriment of the children involved. Additionally, by applying different definitions of child abuse and neglect to children whose parents are religiously motivated and to those whose parents are not, spiritual treatment exemptions violate children\u27s rights to equal protection of the laws. This Article concludes that parental decisionmaking rights with respect to the health care of minors are, quite appropriately, already given broad constitutional protection and are restricted only when society\u27s interest in children\u27s welfare requires it. Spiritual treatment exemptions are thus unnecessary for safeguarding parents\u27 legitimate interests

So-Called Partial-Birth Abortion Bans: Bad Medicine? Maybe. Bad Law? Definitely!

None available

Roger Douglas Groot: A Personal Memoir

A tribute to Professor Roger Douglas Groot

Faith in the Republic: A Frances Lewis Law Center Conversation

None available