ICDs at higher age and clinical risk factors

Background The implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) is effective in preventing sudden cardiac death. However, in elderly patients (aged 75 years or older) the role of ICDs is still not well-defined and controversial. Methods We retrospectively analysed all clinical and survival data of all ICD patients who were ≥75 years at the date of implantation in the Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, the Netherlands and the University Hospital, Basel, Switzerland. Kaplan- Meier survival analysis was performed, and mortality predictors were identified. Mortality of the cohort was compared with a random sample of patients aged 60-70 years originating from the same database and to an age- and sex-matched cohort of Dutch persons. Results The study cohort consisted of 179 patients aged 75 years or older who were implanted between February 1999 and July 2008. The median follow-up time was 2.0 (IQR 2.8) years. Survival rates after 1, 2 and 3 years were 87, 82, 75 %, respectively. Survival was similar for primary and secondary prevention. Mortality in this study population could be predicted by combining four clinical risk factors: QRS duration >120 ms, NYHA class > II, renal failure and atrial fibrillation (AF). Survival was worse compared with the group of ICD patients aged 60-70 years and to the age- and sex-matched group of elderly persons. However, survival was not significantly worse when comparing elderly ICD patients without additional risk factors to the general population. Conclusions Elderly patients still have an acceptable survival probability independent of prevention indication, certainly if there are no additional clinical risk factors. The presence or absence of additional clinical risk factors should be taken into account when making the decision for imp

Adenosine testing after cryoballoon pulmonary vein isolation improves long-term clinical outcome

Background Adenosine infusion after pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) with radiofrequency energy reveals dormant muscular sleeves and predicts atrial fibrillation (AF) recurrence. The aim of our study was to determine whether adenosine could reveal dormant PV sleeves after cryoballoon isolation and study its effect on long-term recurrence of AF. Methods Patients with paroxysmal AF underwent cryoballoon PVI. After PVI, adenosine 25 mg was infused to test for dormant muscular sleeves in each vein. If reconnection under adenosine was shown, further cryoballoon ablation was performed until no more reconnection occurred. Follow-up was performed with ECG, 24-h Holter recording, and a symptom questionnaire at three monthly intervals. Transtelephonic Holter monitoring was performed for 1 month before and 3 months after PVI. Patients who underwent cryoballoon PVI without adenosine administration were used as controls for comparison. Results In the study group (n034, 24 males), adenosine revealed dormant sleeves in 9/132 (8 %) veins, and 7/34 (21 %) patients. All but one vein was further treated until the dormant sleeves were isolated. During a mean follow-up of 520±147 days, 23/34 (68 %) patients were free of AF without antiarrhythmic drugs (AADs). In the control group (n065, 46 males), 29/65 (46 %) were free of AF without AADs. There were significantly less AF recurrences in the study group (p00.04). Conclusions Adenosine administration after cryoballoon PVI reveals dormant muscular sleeves in 21 % of patients. Clinical follow-up shows that adenosine testing is effective in reducing AF recurrence after cryoballoon ablation

Flutter ablation with remote magnetic navigation: Comparison between the 8-mm tip, the irrigated tip and a manual approach

Introduction: Remote magnetic navigated ablation has proven its feasibility in a large group of arrhythmias. Until now only scarce data are available on the use for atrial flutter. In this study we compared remote magnetic navigation (RMN), using non-irrigated and irrigated tip catheters, to manual radiofrequency ablation for ablating typical atrial flutter. Methods: The 3 study groups consisted of 17 patients treated with RMN 8-mm tip; 14 patients with RMN irrigated tip; and 24 patients with a manual 8-mm tip. The primary outcome was the number of patients in whom bidirectional isthmus block could be obtained with 15 applications. Secondary end points were the median number of applications needed, the need to switch to a manual irrigated tip catheter, the procedural and fluoroscopy times. Results: There was no significant difference in the primary end point (RMN 8 mm-tip group: 59%, RMN irrigated tip group: 64% and manual group: 83%). The median number of applications needed to obtain block was higher in the RMN groups compared to the manual group. In 5 patients from the RMN 8-mm tip group, 1 in the RMN irrigated tip group and 1 in the manual group, a switch to a manually irrigated tip catheter was performed. There was no difference in fluoroscopy time, but procedural time was significantly longer in the RMN groups compared to the manual group (P = 0.03). Conclusions: The use of magnetic navigation for the ablation of atrial flutter is feasible but not superior to a manual approach. There was no difference concerning the primary end point of acute success within 15 applications. Overall, more applications were needed and procedure times were longer with RMN but RMN with the irrigating tip is promising