If it Worked for Mary. . . Mary Pickford’s Daily Talks with the Fans

In the nineteenth century, advice literature (conduct, courtesy or etiquette books) was a popular non-fiction genre in America. In fact, advise literature actively invaded other literary genres, most notably sentimental literature, which used fictional characters and situations to dramatize and illustrate this advice. The popularity of the genre even pervaded the twentieth century phenomenon of the film star. This paper will focus on Mary Pickford’s advisory texts and its relationship to nineteenth century advice literature. We will look at examples from Pickford’s syndicated column “Daily Talks” published between 1915 and 1917. Pickford’s texts contain similar rhetorical strategies to sweeten her didactic intent: metaphors, anecdotes, and aporia are put in the familiar and reassuring voice of the intimate friend mixed with the hortatory or inciting manner of the teacher. In terms of content there and love of the home, self-government, religion, education, courtship etc. Working from this familiar and effective literary tradition allowed Pickford to strengthen her star appeal and its consumption as well as to promote a particular “model of living” exemplified by the star’s idealized, almost sanctified, embodiment of American womanhood

Glucose Variability Assessed with Continuous Glucose Monitoring:Reliability, Reference Values, and Correlations with Established Glycemic Indices-The Maastricht Study

Background: Glucose variability (GV) measured by continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) has become an accepted marker of glycemic control. Nevertheless, several methodological aspects of GV assessment require further study. We, therefore, investigated the minimum number of days needed to reliably measure GV, assessed GV reference values, and studied the correlation of GV with established glycemic indices (i.e., HbA(1c), seven-point oral glucose tolerance test [OGTT]-derived indices). Methods: We used cross-sectional data from The Maastricht Study, an observational population-based cohort enriched with type 2 diabetes. Participants with more than 48 h of CGM (iPro2; Medtronic) were included for analysis (n = 851; age: 60 +/- 9years; 49% women; 23% type 2 diabetes). We used mean sensor glucose (MSG), standard deviation (SD), and coefficient of variation (CV) as CGM-derived indices (the latter two for GV quantification). We calculated reliability using the Spearman-Brown prophecy formula, established reference values by calculating 2.5th-97.5th percentiles, and studied correlations using Spearman's rho. Results: Sufficient reliability (R > 0.80) was achieved with two (MSG and SD), or three monitoring days (CV). The reference ranges, assessed in individuals with normal glucose metabolism (n = 470), were 90.5-120.6 mg/dL (MSG), 7.9-24.8 mg/dL (SD), and 7.74%-22.45% (CV). For MSG, the strongest correlation was found with fasting plasma glucose (rho = 0.65 [0.61; 0.69]); for SD, with the 1-h OGTT value (rho = 0.61 [0.56; 0.65]); and for CV, with both the incremental glucose peak (IGP) during the OGTT (rho = 0.50 [0.45; 0.55]) and the 1-h OGTT value (rho = 0.50 [0.45; 0.55]). Conclusions: The reliability findings and reference values are relevant for studies that aim to investigate CGM-measured GV. One-hour OGTT and IGP values can be used as GV indices when CGM is unavailable

Efficacy of halopeRIdol to decrease the burden of Delirium In adult Critically ill patiEnts (EuRIDICE): study protocol for a prospective randomised multi-centre double-blind placebo-controlled clinical trial in the Netherlands

Introduction Delirium in critically ill adults is associated with prolonged hospital stay, increased mortality and greater cognitive and functional decline. Current practice guideline recommendations advocate the use of nonpharmacological strategies to reduce delirium. The routine use of scheduled haloperidol to treat delirium is not recommended given a lack of evidence regarding its ability to resolve delirium nor improve relevant short-term and longer-term outcomes. This study aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of haloperidol for the treatment of delirium in adult critically ill patients to reduce days spent with coma or delirium. Methods and analysis EuRIDICE is a prospective, multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Study population consists of adult intensive care unit (ICU) patients without acute neurological injury who have delirium based on a positive Intensive Care Delirium Screening Checklist (ICDSC) or Confusion Assessment Method for the ICU (CAM-ICU) assessment. Intervention is intravenous haloperidol 2.5mg (or matching placebo) every 8 hours, titrated daily based on ICDSC or CAMICU positivity to a maximum of 5mg every 8 hours, until delirium resolution or ICU discharge. Main study endpoint is delirium and coma-free days (DCFD) up to 14 days after randomisation. Secondary endpoints include (1) 28-day and 1-year mortality, (2) cognitive and functional performance at 3 and 12 months, (3) patient and family delirium and ICU experience, (4) psychological sequelae during and after ICU stay, (4) safety concerns associated with haloperidol use and (5) cost-effectiveness. Differences in DCFDs between haloperidol and placebo group will be analysed using Poisson regression analysis. Study recruitment started in February 2018 and continues. Ethics and dissemination The study has been approved by the Medical Ethics Committee of the Erasmus University Medical Centre Rotterdam (MEC2017-511) and by the Institutional Review Boards of the participating sites. Its results will be disseminated via peer-reviewed publication and conference presentations