16 research outputs found

    Bilateral Acquired Progressive Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Myelination

    No full text
    The authors present the multimodal imaging findings of an unusual case of bilateral acquired progressive myelination of the optic disc during a 10-year follow-up period in a hyperopic adolescent patient in the absence of an underlying ocular or systemic abnormality. Myelination of the left optic disc was noted at age 7 and of the right optic disc at age 13, but no other ocular or systemic abnormalities were identified. Cross-sectional optical coherence tomography (OCT) and en face OCT angiography confirmed the presence of myelination of the retinal nerve fiber layer and excluded other etiologic possibilities including an astrocytic hamartoma. [Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging Retina. 2018;49:e147-e150.]

    Retrospective comparative analysis of intraocular lens calculation formulas after hyperopic refractive surgery.

    No full text
    PURPOSE:To compare the intraocular lens calculation formulas and evaluate postoperative refractive results of patients with previous hyperopic corneal refractive surgery. DESIGN:Retrospective, comparative, observational study. SETTING:Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA. METHODS:Clinical charts and optical biometric data of 39 eyes from 24 consecutive patients diagnosed with previous hyperopic laser vision correction and cataract surgery were reviewed and analyzed. The Intraocular lens (IOL) power calculation using the Holladay 2 formula (Lenstar) and the American Society of Cataract and Refractive Surgery (ASCRS) Post-Refractive IOL Calculator (version 4.9, 2017) were compared to the actual manifest refractive spherical equivalent (MRSE) following cataract surgery. No pre-Lasik / PRK or post-Lasik / PRK information was used in any of the calculations. The IOL prediction error, the mean IOL prediction error, the median absolute refractive prediction error, and the percentages of eyes within ±0.50 diopter (D) and ±1.00 D of the predicted refraction were calculated. RESULTS:The Holladay 2 formula produced a mean arithmetic IOL prediction error significantly different from zero (P = 0.003). Surprisingly, the mean arithmetic IOL prediction errors generated by Shammas, Haigis-L and Barret True K No History formulas were not significantly different from zero (P = 0.14, P = 0.49, P = 0.81, respectively).There were no significant differences in the median absolute refractive prediction error or percentage of eyes within ± 0.50 D or ± 1.00 D of the predicted refraction between formulas or methods. CONCLUSION:In eyes with previous hyperopic LASIK/PRK and no prior data, there were no significant differences in the accuracy of IOL power calculation between the Holladay 2 formula and the ASCRS Post-refractive IOL calculator
    corecore