18 research outputs found
The Exposure of Breast Cancer Cells to Fulvestrant and Tamoxifen Modulates Cell Migration Differently
There is no doubt that there are increased benefits of hormonal therapy to breast cancer patients; however, current evidence suggests that estrogen receptor (ER) blockage using antiestrogens is associated with a small induction of invasiveness in vitro. The mechanism by which epithelial tumor cells escape from the primary tumor and colonize to a distant site is not entirely understood. This study investigates the effect of two selective antagonists of the ER, Fulvestrant (Fulv) and Tamoxifen (Tam), on the invasive ability of breast cancer cells. We found that 17β-estradiol (E2) demonstrated a protective role regarding cell migration and invasion. Fulv did not alter this effect while Tam stimulated active cell migration according to an increase in Snail and a decrease in E-cadherin protein expression. Furthermore, both tested agents increased expression of matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) and enhanced invasive potential of breast cancer cells. These changes were in line with focal adhesion kinase (FAK) rearrangement. Our data indicate that the anti-estrogens counteracted the protective role of E2 concerning migration and invasion since their effect was not limited to antiproliferative events. Although Fulv caused a less aggressive result compared to Tam, the benefits of hormonal therapy concerning invasion and metastasis yet remain to be investigated
Phase 2 study of cabazitaxel as second-line treatment in patients with HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer previously treated with taxanes—a Hellenic Cooperative Oncology Group (HeCOG) Trial
Background: Cabazitaxel is a novel taxane that might be active in breast cancer resistant to first-generation taxanes. Methods: The purpose of the current multicentre phase II trial was to evaluate the activity and safety of cabazitaxel, as second-line treatment, in patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative metastatic breast cancer (MBC) previously treated with taxanes. The primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR). Results: Eighty-four patients were enrolled between October 2012 and November 2016. Taxane resistance to previous treatment was detected in 43 cases. The ORR was 22.6% in the intent-to-treat population, 23.3% in taxane-resistant and 20.5% in taxane-non-resistant cases. At a median follow-up of 39.6 months, the median progression-free survival and overall survival were 3.7 months (95% CI 2.2–4.4) and 15.2 months (95% CI 11.3–19.4), respectively. Regarding toxicity, grade 3–4 neutropenia was reported in 22.6% and febrile neutropenia in 6% of the patients, respectively. Two fatal events (one febrile neutropenia and one sepsis) were reported as being related to study treatment. Conclusions: This phase II trial suggests that cabazitaxel is active as second-line treatment in taxane-pretreated patients with HER2-negative MBC, with manageable toxicity. © 2020, The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Cancer Research UK
The prognostic and predictive value of mRNA expression of vascular endothelial growth factor family members in breast cancer: a study in primary tumors of high-risk early breast cancer patients participating in a randomized Hellenic Cooperative Oncology Group trial
Introduction: The main prognostic variables in early breast cancer are
tumor size, histological grade, estrogen receptor/progesterone receptor
(ER/PgR) status, number of positive nodes and human epidermal growth
factor receptor 2 (HER2) status. The present study evaluated the
prognostic and/or predictive value of vascular endothelial growth factor
(VEGF) family members in high-risk early breast cancer patients treated
with adjuvant chemohormonotherapy.
Methods: RNA was isolated from 308 formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded
primary tumor samples from breast cancer patients enrolled in the
HE10/97 trial, evaluating adjuvant dose-dense sequential chemotherapy
with epirubicin followed by cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, fluorouracil
(CMF) with or without paclitaxel (E-T-CMF versus E-CMF). A fully
automated method based on magnetic beads was applied for RNA extraction,
followed by one-step quantitative RT-PCR for mRNA analysis of VEGF-A,
-B, -C and vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR) 1, 2, 3.
Results: With a median follow-up of 8 years, 109 patients (35%)
developed a relapse and 80 patients (26%) died. In high VEGF-C and
VEGFR1 mRNA expressing tumors, ER/PgR-negative tumors (Fisher’s exact
test, P = 0.001 and P = 0.021, respectively) and HER2-positive tumors (P
< 0.001 and P = 0.028, respectively) were more frequent than in low
VEGF-C and VEGFR1 expressing tumors, respectively. From the VEGF family
members evaluated, high VEGFR1 mRNA expression (above the 75th
percentile) emerged as a significant negative prognostic factor for
overall survival (OS; hazard ratio (HR) = 1.60, 95% confidence interval
(CI): 1.01 to 2.55, Wald’s P = 0.047) and disease-free survival (DFS; HR
= 1.67, 95% CI: 1.13 to 2.48, P = 0.010), when adjusting for treatment
group. High VEGF-C mRNA expression was predictive for benefit from
adjuvant treatment with paclitaxel (E-T-CMF arm) for OS (test for
interaction, Wald’s P = 0.038), while in multivariate analysis the
interaction of VEGF-C with taxane treatment was significant for both OS
(Wald’s P = 0.019) and DFS (P = 0.041) and continuous VEGF-B mRNA
expression values for OS (P = 0.019).
Conclusions: The present study reports, for the first time, that VEGF-C
mRNA overexpression, as assessed by qRT-PCR, has a strong predictive
value in high-risk early breast cancer patients undergoing adjuvant
paclitaxel-containing treatment. Further studies are warranted to
validate the prognostic and/or predictive value of VEGF-B, VEGF-C and
VEGFR1 in patients treated with adjuvant therapies and to reveal which
members of the VEGF family could possibly be useful markers in
identifying patients who will benefit most from anti-VEGF strategies