Advancing tuna catch allocation negotiations: an analysis of sovereign rights and fisheries access arrangements

Regional fisheries management organisations (RFMOs) determine conservation measures for transboundary fsheries resources. They are also a forum for collective action toward the management of marine resources. One of the most complex and controversial aspects of this process is the allocation of catches between RFMO members. There are a variety of processes that can be used for catch allocation. In recent years, there has been a trend in some RFMOs towards establishing a system of criteria or indicators to determine the volume or percentage of catch that should be allocated to each RFMO member. Establishing such a system is challenging and the position of countries negotiating at RFMOs is also shaped by fisheries access arrangements. The debate on allocation has been ongoing at the Indian Ocean Tuna Commission for more than a decade, where one key point of disagreement is the treatment of historical catch taken in the waters of a coastal State. On the one hand, coastal states claim that catches historically taken in their exclusive economic zones (EEZ) should be attributed to them based on their sovereign rights over living resources. On the other, some fishing countries from outside the region claim catch history based on fishing conducted in the coastal State’s waters pursuant to access agreements. We analysed UNCLOS articles, publicly available fisheries access agreements, and national legislation to unpack the linkage between fisheries access arrangements and catch allocation discussions, and we also explored examples from other regions and RFMOs. We point out that the sovereign rights of coastal states over their EEZ provide a strong basis for allocation negotiations. In the absence of specific agreements to the contrary, any catch history that arises from foreign vessels fishing inside the EEZ should be attributed to the coastal State. We also argue that it is time for members of RFMOs—and especially of the Indian Ocean Tuna Commission—to move beyond the historical catch debate. They need to resolve their differences or consider other ways to allocate participatory rights in shared fisheries

A geopolitical-economy of distant water fisheries access arrangements

In recent decades, fishing fleets and effort have grown in aggregate throughout the waters of lower-income coastal countries, much of which is carried out by vessels registered in higher-income countries. Fisheries access arrangements (FAAs) underpin this key trend in ocean fisheries and have their origins in UNCLOS’s promise to establish resource ownership as a mechanism to increase benefits to newly independent coastal and island states. Coastal states use FAAs to permit a foreign state, firm, or industry association to fish within its waters. This paper provides a conceptual approach for understanding FAAs across the global ocean and for exploring their potential to deliver on the promise of UNCLOS. Illustrated with the findings from multiple case studies, we advance understanding of FAAs by developing a geopolitical-economy of access that attends to the combination of contingent and context-specific economic, ecologic, and geopolitical forces that shape the terms, conditions and practices of the FAAs shaping this persistent phenomenon of higher-income industrial fleets fishing throughout lower-income countries’ waters

Epidémies de peste urbaine à Majunga, côte ouest de Madagascar : résumé

In August 1991, an epidemic of urban plague broke out in Majunga, a port on the western coast of Madagascar. As the first resurgence of the disease in this area in 70 years, the episode was a dramatic reminder of the ubiquity of the disease and layed low the falsely reassuring idea that plague was confined to well known centers of high altitude. After the epidemic had claimed 12 victims, 21 patients suffering from bubonic plague and 7 cases of pneumonic plague, it was brought under control by treating exposed subjects and introducing antivectorial measures. Transmission to man continued in the shape of sporadic cases of bubonic plague until April 1992 and a total number of 41 probable or confirmed bacteriological cases (not counting those deceased) were recorded out of 2020 suspected cases. The history of the disease related almost all these cases to the highly populated and unsanitary neighbourhood of Marolaka, situated on the edge of the Betsiboka estuary, and which has kept semi-rural characteristics. Its murine population had practically disappeared, decimated by an epizootic in early July. Out of the two captured sets of two #Rattus rattus (41 fleas per animal) and two #R. norvegicus each, three were carriers of the bacillus. Numerous shrew-mice (#Suncus murinus) occupied the zone and three tested positive to the direct bacteriological test. For the insectivore, the mean #Xenopsylla cheopis index 4 (n=16), rising to 26 in positive animals. The discovery of a plague infested rat carrying #X. cheopis and the persistence of #P. irritans after insecticide treatments, led us to doubt the efficiency of the antivectorial fight that had been undertaken. Risk of endemization was referred to. After a period of quiet of 3 years, isolated cases were detected in March and May 1995, followed by a new epidemic between July 1995 and March 1996. 617 clinical suspects of bubonic plague were notified... (D'après résumé d'auteur