20 research outputs found
Correlations between stimuli measures (grip strength and PC1 of body size) and rating measures (mean Likert ratings, Elo scores, mElo scores and log-transformed Bradley-Terry scores) for the 82 stimulus images.
<p>Correlations between stimuli measures (grip strength and PC1 of body size) and rating measures (mean Likert ratings, Elo scores, mElo scores and log-transformed Bradley-Terry scores) for the 82 stimulus images.</p
Correlations between rating measure scores from Study 1 and Study 2.
<p>Correlations between rating measure scores from Study 1 and Study 2.</p
Weighted consistency indices for the original sequence (small grey circles) and mean weighted consistency indices (large black circles) calculated for an increasing number of Study 1 raters (1–96, in increments of 1).
<p>The whiskers represent inter-quartile ranges of indices from the 100 sequences generated to calculate the mean index.</p
Elo scores from the original sequence (grey circles) and mElo scores (black circles) are depicted for each of the stimulus images, arranged from left to right in order of decreasing mElo.
<p>The whiskers depict the range of Elo scores from the 100 sequences generated to calculate the mElo scores.</p
Violin plots depict the distribution of response times for paired comparison trials (left), and Likert trials (right).
<p>Individual values are depicted by small grey circles. Error bars depict within-subject 95% confidence intervals. Means are depicted by large black circles.</p
Correlations between mean Likert ratings, Elo scores, mElo scores (100 iterations), mElo(M) scores (1000 iterations), and log-transformed Bradley-Terry scores for the 82 stimulus images.
<p>Correlations between mean Likert ratings, Elo scores, mElo scores (100 iterations), mElo(M) scores (1000 iterations), and log-transformed Bradley-Terry scores for the 82 stimulus images.</p
Correlations between stimuli measures (grip strength and PC1 of body size) and rating measures (mean Likert ratings, Elo scores, mElo scores (100 iterations), mElo(M) scores (1000 iterations), and log-transformed Bradley-Terry scores) for the 82 stimulus images.
<p>Correlations between stimuli measures (grip strength and PC1 of body size) and rating measures (mean Likert ratings, Elo scores, mElo scores (100 iterations), mElo(M) scores (1000 iterations), and log-transformed Bradley-Terry scores) for the 82 stimulus images.</p
Correlations between mean Likert ratings, Elo scores, mElo scores and log-transformed Bradley-Terry scores for the 82 stimulus images.
<p>Correlations between mean Likert ratings, Elo scores, mElo scores and log-transformed Bradley-Terry scores for the 82 stimulus images.</p
Descriptive statistics for mean Likert ratings, Elo scores, mElo scores (using 100 iterations), mElo(M) scores (using 1000 iterations) and Bradley-Terry scores for the 82 stimulus images.
<p>Descriptive statistics for mean Likert ratings, Elo scores, mElo scores (using 100 iterations), mElo(M) scores (using 1000 iterations) and Bradley-Terry scores for the 82 stimulus images.</p
Descriptive statistics for mean Likert ratings, Elo scores, mElo scores and Bradley-Terry scores for the 82 stimulus images.
<p>Descriptive statistics for mean Likert ratings, Elo scores, mElo scores and Bradley-Terry scores for the 82 stimulus images.</p