ALIGATOR identified common OZALC-NAG and SAGE GO terms and KEGG pathways for the analysis of SNPs p-value<0.05 and ARIC replication results.

<p><b>acc:</b> Category of gene (prefix GO indicates Gene ontology and hsa KEGG pathways) and corresponding <b>name</b>;</p>#<p><b>Genes Cat.:</b> the total number of genes grouped by the category. For each study:</p>#<p><b>genes</b> significant; corresponding category-specific <b><i>p-value</i></b>; and the <b>Expected</b> number of genes.</p>*<p>Combined p-values were calculated employing the weighted Z-score method.</p

Go terms for cholinergic receptors and significant genes.

<p>The p-value of each gene was assigned based on the most significant SNP in gene sequences and flanking regions (Left panel). SNPs in linkage disequilibrium (r²>0.2) and in a local proximity (1 Mb) were removed. Colored boxes in the right panel reflect the assignment of each gene to the different GO terms.</p

Characteristics of the studies and subjects analyzed.

*<p>CPD: Cigarettes per day.</p

Number of categories of genes identified by ALIGATOR for OZALC-NAG and SAGE studies for smoking quantity.

#<p><b>SNPs</b>: number of SNPs that achieved a significant for each threshold for OZALC-NAG and SAGE studies;</p>#<p><b>Genes</b>: number of genes mapped;</p>#<p><b>cat</b> and <b><i>p-value reflect</i></b> the excess of categories of genes (GO terms or KEGG pathways) for the thresholds applied to the category-specific <i>p-values</i> in the OZALC-NAG and the SAGE studies. “Common” rows show the number of overlapping categories of genes significantly enriched for both studies and the corresponding statistical significance.</p

Meta-analysis assessing potential confounding of SES variables on the association between F_ROHLD and height.

<p>SES variables are educational attainment (EA) and occupational status (OS).</p

Forest plot of the effect of F_ROHLD on height.

<p>Results of a meta-analysis of the association between F_ROHLD and height are shown for twenty-one population samples. The model was adjusted for age and sex in all samples. Additionally, it was adjusted for genomic kinship in samples with pairs of related individuals (CROATIA-Korčula, CROATIA-Split, CROATIA-Vis, ERF, FINRISK, HBCS, H2000, INGI-CARL, INGI-FVG, INGI-VB, MICROS, NFBC1966, NSPHS, ORCADES and YFS). The plot shows estimated effect sizes (solid squares) for each population, with 95% confidence intervals (horizontal lines). Each sample estimate is weighted by the inverse of the squared standard error of the regression coefficient, so that the smaller the standard error of the study, the greater the contribution it makes to the pooled regression coefficient. The area of the solid squares is proportional to the weighting given to each study in the meta-analysis. Effect sizes in z-score units (with 95% confidence intervals) are: CROATIA-Korčula = −0.02 (−0.09, 0.04); CROATIA-Split = −0.06 (−0.1, −0.002); CROATIA-Vis = −0.07 (−0.1, −0.01); EGCUT = −0.09 (−0.04, 0.2); ERF = −0.08 (−0.1, −0.05); FINRISK = −0.1 (−0.2, −0.07); HBCS = −0.04 (−0.2, 0.1); H2000 = −0.2 (−0.5, 0.04); INGI-CARL = 0.02 (−0.03, 0.07); INGI-FVG = −0.0001 (−0.08, 0.08); INGI-VB = 0.005 (−0.03, 0.04); LBC1921 = −0.1 (−0.3, 0.04); LBC1936 = 0.2 (−0.1, 0.4); MICROS = −0.06 (−0.08, −0.05); NFBC1966 = −0.1 (−0.2, −0.1); NSPHS = −0.07 (−0.07, −0.06); ORCADES = −0.04 (−0.08, 0.001); QIMR = −0.07 (−0.5, 0.3); RS = −0.02 (−0.1, 0.08); SOCCS = −0.05 (−0.4, 0.3); YFS = −0.3 (−1.2, 0.7).</p

Sample details.

1<p>All data were analysed using Illumina SNP arrays. 300 refers to the Illumina HumanHap 300 panel, 370 to the Illumina HumanHap 370 Duo/Quad panels, 610 to the Illumina Human 610 Quad panel and 670 to the Illumina Human 670 Quad panel. In order to harmonise the data, the analysis was conducted using only those SNPs present in the HumanHap 300 panel.</p>2<p>Population-based studies.</p>3<p>Population-based studies in isolated populations.</p>4<p>Birth cohort studies.</p>5<p>Case control studies.</p

Three alternative measures of mean homozygosity, with 95% confidence intervals, by population sample.

<p>(A) shows mean F_ROH by population sample. F_ROH is defined as the percentage of the genotyped autosomal genome in ROH measuring at least 1.5 Mb. Mean values of F_ROH per population (with 95% confidence intervals) are: CROATIA-Korčula = 1.27 (1.18, 1.36); CROATIA-Split = 0.65 (0.59, 0.71); CROATIA-Vis = 0.94 (0.87,1.01); EGCUT = 0.56 (0.54, 0.58); ERF = 1.12 (1.04, 1.20); FINRISK = 0.79 (0.77, 0.82); HBCS = 0.63 (0.60, 0.65); H2000 = 0.84 (0.82, 0.86); INGI-CARL = 0.78 (0.65, 0.91); INGI-FVG = 1.49 (1.40, 1.58); INGI-VB = 0.76 (0.71, 0.81); LBC1921 = 0.30 (0.25, 0.35); LBC1936 = 0.26 (0.24, 0.28); MICROS = 0.93 (0.87, 0.99); NFBC1966 = 1.02 (1.00, 1.04); NSPHS = 2.83 (2.64, 3.02); ORCADES = 0.81 (0.75, 0.87); QIMR = 0.22 (0.21, 0.23); RS = 0.29 (0.28, 0.30); SOCCS = 0.30 (0.28, 0.32); YFS = 0.81 (0.79, 0.83). (B) shows mean F_ROHLD by population sample. F_ROHLD is defined as the percentage of the genotyped autosomal genome in ROH measuring at least 1.0 Mb, derived from a panel of independent SNPs. Mean values of F_ROHLD per population (with 95% confidence intervals) are: CROATIA-Korčula = 0.67 (0.61, 0.73); CROATIA-Split = 0.13 (0.11, 0.15); CROATIA-Vis = 0.48 (0.43, 0.53); EGCUT = 0.10 (0.09, 0.10); ERF = 0.53 (0.48, 0.58); FINRISK = 0.21 (0.20, 0.23); HBCS = 0.13 (0.11, 0.14); H2000 = 0.23 (0.22, 0.24); INGI-CARL = 0.44 (0.34, 0.54); INGI-FVG = 0.93 (0.86, 0.99); INGI-VB = 0.41 (037, 0.45); LBC1921 = 0.05 (0.02, 0.09); LBC1936 = 0.02 (0.01, 0.03); MICROS = 0.47 (0.43, 0.51); NFBC1966 = 0.32 (0.31, 0.33); NSPHS = 1.17 (1.07, 1.27); ORCADES = 0.35 (0.31, 0.39); QIMR = 0.013 (0.011, 0.015); RS = 0.04 (0.01, 0.07); SOCCS = 0.03 (0.02, 0.04); YFS = 0.20 (0.19, 0.21). (C) shows mean F_hom by population sample. F_hom is defined as the percentage of genotyped autosomal SNPs that are homozygous. Mean values of F_hom per population (with 95% confidence intervals) are: CROATIA-Korčula = 65.47 (65.43, 65.51); CROATIA-Split = 65.28 (65.25, 65.31); CROATIA-Vis = 65.61 (65.58, 65.64); EGCUT = 65.69 (65.68, 65.70); ERF = 65.32 (65.29, 65.35); FINRISK = 65.25 (65.23, 65.27); HBCS = 65.13 (65.12, 65.14); H2000 = 65.24 (65.23, 65.25); INGI-CARL = 65.20 (65.14, 65.26); INGI-FVG = 65.53 (65.49, 65.57); INGI-VB = 65.18 (65.16, 65.20); LBC1921 = 65.00 (64.97, 65.03); LBC1936 = 65.00 (64.99, 65.01); MICROS = 65.26 (65.23, 65.29); NFBC1966 = 65.27 (65.26, 65.28); NSPHS = 66.09 (66.01, 66.17); ORCADES = 65.37 (65.34, 65.40); QIMR = 64.75 (64.74, 64.76); RS = 65.00 (64.99, 65.01); SOCCS = 64.97 (64.95, 64.99); YFS = 65.26 (65.25, 65.27).</p

Meta-analysis of the association between height and genome-wide homozygosity, adjusted for age and sex only.

<p>Meta-analysis of the association between height and genome-wide homozygosity, adjusted for age and sex only.</p